Excerpts

This analysis revealed significant or marginally significant effects of strategy in the left IOG (F [1, 12] = 9.8, p = 0.009) and SPL (F [1, 12] = 5.1, p = 0.05), whereas the same effect did not reach significance either in the left PMd (F [1, 12] = 0.3 p = 0.6) or in the IFG (F [1, 12] = 1.0 p = 0.3).

No significant difference was found for >1.8 s between blue- and red-light stimulus ( t (14) = -1.2, p = 0.125, d = -0.31), but highly significant difference in pupillary change to blue- compared to red-light for <1.7 s ( t (14) = -2.71, p = 0.009, d = -0.70), see Fig 4 .

Even after adjustment of the imbalances in the baseline characteristics, the lower risk of the ablation group relative to the conservative group for the primary outcome measure remained highly significant, both in the asymptomatic and symptomatic AF patients (adjusted HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25–0.82, P = 0.009; adjusted HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.11–0.35, P<0.001).

The Story scenario also approached significance in being easier to discriminate than the Compliments scenario ( p = .009).

t -tests demonstrated that these correlations were significant in all scene-selective ROIs except for the LH RSC, where the correlation was only marginally significant (LH PPA: r ̄ = .17, t (14) = 3.05, p < .009; RH PPA: r ̄ = .15, t (14) = 3.06, p < .008; LH RSC: r ̄ = .08, t (14) = 1.88, p < .08; RH RSC: r ̄ = .15, t (14) = 4.29, p < .001; LH OPA: r ̄ = .23, t (14) = 7.38, p < .000003; RH OPA: r ̄ = .16, t (14) = 2.24, p < .04).

However, with just the 75 native Amazonian species (see S1 Table ), the results were striking: the effect of archaeological context was highly significant (p = 0.009) in explaining the variability in floristic compositions ( Fig 2 ).

Although this association only achieved borderline significance, there was a highly significant genotype by diabetes interaction (p = 0.009).

Approximately half the comparisons based on locus Lpol03 yielded highly significant F ST values after Benjamini–Yekutieli correction (ranging from 0.0772 to 0.2543, P < 0.00908).

α-Sarcomeric actinin expression was highly significant ( p = 0.0091) in Aza+AA group at the end of the treatment not only when compared to control but also when compared to Aza group ( p = 0.0001) ( Fig 4B ).

The results indicate that our sensor performance reveals a decreasing trend based on statistical significance (P = 0.00919) after 15 days.

In contrast, the AUCs for reconstructions using the NZPL sCSD were significantly above the critical AUC across all jitter FWHMs, with the exception of the largest FWHM (π radians), where EEG reconstruction was non-significant and MEG reconstruction was borderline significant ( t (9) = 2.86, p = 0.0094).

Cox models, estimated separately in grade I–II and grade III tumors, indicated a highly significant association between ECM3 and worse survival probability only in grade III tumors (HR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.3–7.0, p = 0.0098).

This cluster also showed nominally significant enrichment for the two overlapping GO terms "fatty acid metabolic process" (GO:0006631, p = 9.8x10 -3 ) and "lipid metabolic process" (GO:0006629, p = 0.029), which include Abhd5 , Apoe , C3 , Ces1d , Echdc2 , Fabp4 , Fads3 , Gpam , Hsd11b1 , Liph , Lpin2 , Lpl , Pmvk , Ptgs2 , Scd1 , Sftpb , and Vldlr .

Expression of the Traf2 gene was up-regulated in the model group, which was highly significant ( P = 0.00984), and DECB could promote the expression of this gene (the ratio of the DECB group/model group was 1.44). 5.

Correlation of the Daymet estimated April 1 SWE with empirical US SNOTEL observations within the same period and region of the COC was positive and highly significant (r 2 = 0.51, p<0.01).

Chi-square tests of the relationship between EJ and socio-demographic variables also found that both race/ethnicity and poverty were highly significant (both p < 0.01).

85 out of 136 (63%) correlation coefficients ( N = 55185) were significantly positive, with 73 (54%) of the coefficients highly significant ( p < .001), 9 (7%) of those moderately significant ( p < .01), and 3 (2%) of those weakly significant ( p < .05).

Results show that including these three indicator variables in our statistical specification, although they are individually all positive and highly significant (p<0.01), do not appear to attenuate the associations between depressive symptoms and sleep difficulties.

The MIXED procedure, ANOVA, Kruskal-wallis test and correlations were declared as highly significant when p<0.01 and significant when 0.01≤p≤0.05, while 0.05<p<0.1 were declared as trend.

The mean squares and genetic parameters of the RILs showed highly significant ( p <0.01 or p <0.001) variation for all the studied traits across three years ( S1 Table ).

The VPT for age groups 40–49 and 50–59 years were significantly not different from each other, ANOVA F (3, 387) = 11.9, P < 0.01 with Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison test ( Table 3 ) .

R 2 values were much lower in the first ratoon crop than the second crop, and the scatterplots of the first crop were much more concentrated than in the second crop, but the correlation coefficient (r) was extremely significant (P<0.01) as shown in S1 Table .

Temperature in winter showed a negative significant trend over the years (estimate = -0.046, SD = 0.013, p < 0.001), while mean temperature in October had an increasing trend (estimate = 0.049, SD = 0.015, p < 0.01) ( Fig 4 ).

Characterization of multi-flowering genotypes The analysis of variance among nine garden pea genotypes showed highly significant differences ( P ≤ 0.01) for all the 14 traits studied ( S2 Table ), indicating a high genetic variability among the genotypes.

Table 3 presents evidence that non-subsidized firms had a significantly higher exit rate (3.73%) compared to subsidized firms (2.41%), resulting in a mean difference of −1.38%, with a highly significant t-statistic of −7.05 (p < 0.01).