The difference in the number of blood-borne bacteria recovered from the mice infected with the knock-in mutant versus the srfH deletion strain was highly significant (p-value = 0.01).
Excerpts
[19] revealed a highly significant enrichment (p<0.01) of E2F target genes in the downregulated fraction ( Figure 3 D ; Table 1 ).
Differences between the two parents were statistically highly significant for all the traits studied (P<0.01 to 0.001) with the S. lycopersicum parent having higher trait values as compared to the S. pimpinellifolium parent in all the traits except LRD/Bz ( Table 1 ).
In spite of these similarities, the PERMANOVA analysis showed that for the whole assemblage of environmental variables, differences between the two groups, ‘dark water’ and ‘white’ lakes, were highly significant ( P <0.01) and accounted for 36% of the total variation of environmental parameters ( Table S2 ).
Threshold for highly significant difference was p<0.01, for significant difference was p<0.05.
Nominally significant associations ( p < 0.01) were detected for several variants in genes encoding vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 2 ( VIPR2 ), period circadian regulator 2 ( PER2 ), casein kinase 1 epsilon ( CSNK1E ), and activator of transcription and developmental regulator ( AUTS2 ), but no signal survived correction for multiple testing.
Significant or highly significant differences were respectively considered as 0.05>P>0.01 or P<0.01.
Model 8 is a test of the positive effect of R&D internationalization on domestic technology alliances, and the promotion effect of R&D internationalization on domestic technology alliances is extremely significant ( β = 0.3603, p < 0.01).
A highly significant increase (P<0.01) in CD25 was detected on monocytes ( Fig 6A ) at the 1-hour time where the monocyte numbers were reduced, showing that among the monocytes remaining in the blood circulation some were activated.
Highly significant differences in KS were identified in men’s singles matches in round scenario ( Figs 7a and 7b ), with similar result observed in women’s singles matches ( p < 0.01).
Differences were considered statistically significant with p≤0.05 and highly significant with p≤0.01.
lnCatalase was associated with worse Reasoning (b = -.081, p < .001), but the associated p value from the multivariate test was only marginally significant at .051. lnUreA was associated with worse Reasoning (b = -.059, p < .01); the p value from the associated multivariate test was .049.
The phase average wavelength and MoCA scores were negatively correlated in 13 brain regions (81.3% of the total, P < 0.05), and 10 of them were highly significant ( P < 0.01), indicating that the lower the cognitive score, the longer the wavelength.
Although we found marginal significance between two SNPs, rs7013278 and rs7014346 (HR = 2.20, P = 0.01 and HR = 1.96, P = 0.03 respectively), with inferior CRC survival by multivariate regression analysis, none of these variants showed study-wide association with survival after correction for multiple testing.
The difference between both the probability and subtraction model with four CPGs and the experimental values in the mean and median IPIs, and the IPI standard deviation was highly significant (P<0.01, Kruskal-Wallis Test, followed by Dunn's Multiple Comparisons Test, Table 1 ).
At the 95% probability level, the results showed that the fertilizer concentration and sediment concentration of the type-H 1 drip irrigation tape reached the extremely significant level (p < 0.01).
After optimizing the allocation of water resources, the simulated maize yields obtained from the three irrigation schemes over the two -year period ranged from 10069.8 kg/ha to 14734.8 kg/ha, the differences among all treatments reached a highly significant level (P < 0.01), indicating that there were statistically significant inter-group differences.
A breakdown of PCS and MCS scores for each of the 4 BMI groups is given in table 2 which again demonstrated a significant trend for decreasing pre-operative and post-operative scores as BMI increased (both p<0.01).
This comparison for CD3+IT-CD8 was borderline significant ( P = 0.01) ( Fig 2F ).
The values were indicated to be extremely significant different when p <0.01 by applying Student’s t-test.
Out of the 28 possible correlation pairs, there were 23 highly significant (p< 0.01) and two significant (p< 0.05) correlations.
Results revealed highly significant differences (P < 0.01) among provenances, sites, and their interactions for all traits.
** Indicates highly significant (P<0.01) results (Student's t-test).
Treatment was the primary driver of growth enhancement, showing highly significant main effects on plant height, root length, stem diameter, and fresh weight (P < 0.01 for all).
This effect was highly significant, Fig.1 ; χ 2 = 18.29, df = 2, P <<0.01.