Excerpts

The difference in performance for the two modalities was moderately significant ( t (118) = -2.61, p = .01, BF = 4.03), with a higher performance in the haptic domain.

For nationality diversity (Column 3), the interaction Bsize×Nationality 2 is highly significant (β = 0.022, p < 0.01), supporting H4.

Our model demonstrate that the preservation of the biocultural fund- represented here as Biocultural Savings [S]- is a positive and highly significant predictor of social well-being ( β = 0.685, p < 0.01), alongside a positive impact from the indigenous population index ( β = 0.015, p < 0.1), suggesting that cultural identity plays a foundational role in regional resilience.

Educational heterogeneity (Column 2): The DFI × High Education interaction is large and highly significant ( β =0.008, SE = 0.002, p < 0.01), showing that farmers with ≥9 years of schooling (junior high completion) benefit 80% more from DFI than farmers with <9 years.

With an overlap of 50 years (which is commonly used in tree-ring studies), GLK becomes significant (p<0.05) at 62% and highly significant (p<0.01) at 67%.

The ANOVA test on the distance walked during the 6MWT indicated that the factor "time" was highly significant (p<0.01) while the factor "group" (p = 0.49) and the interaction between factors (p = 0.27) were not significant.

Significance was set at P <0.05 and highly significant at P <0.01.

Comparisons were deemed significant when p <0.05 and highly significant when p <0.01.

Note, however, that we did find a highly significant improvement in performance after the break (block 5 vs. post-break block: F(1,19) = 10.74, p < .01, η p 2 = .36), suggesting that performance before the break may nevertheless have been suboptimal.

German terms continue to exhibit a positive trend during WWII (r = 0.79, p<0.01).

3B ) were highly significant (p<0.01).

As can be seen from Panel E-H, LCAD expression was lower in the MS-S-N group than in the SD-S-N group; in contrast to the MS-S-N group, LCAD mRNA expression in the MS-S-I ( P < 0.05) and MS-E-I ( P < 0.01) groups showed a trend of increasing; in the MS-E-I group, LCAD protein expression was significantly increased ( P < 0.01), and in the MS-E-I group, LCAD protein expression was significantly higher ( P < 0.05) than in the MS-E-N group.

This response was somewhat attenuated at the highest concentration of 50 ng/mL, though still highly significant (P<.01) for the uninfected mucosa.

Similarly, Fu’s FS was negative and highly significant (P<0.01) for all the studied breeds.

An analysis of variance with “type of VFD” (RHH versus scotoma) and “VFD present/absent” revealed a highly significant main effect of the simulated VFD (present vs. absent; F (1, 7) = 15.1, p<0.01).

There was a highly significant difference between the observed and the surrogate data (p<0.01), with one cluster over the frontal cortex and one cluster over parietal cortex, which we subsequently defined as regions of interest (ROIs).

The spatial lag term (Wy(Kernel)) was highly significant (β = 0.900, P < 0.01), indicating a pronounced spatial spillover effect, whereby high-density village clusters in northern and central Henan facilitate the emergence of secondary clusters in adjacent regions through cultural diffusion, population migration, and shared agricultural practices.

Solar radiation of MERRA showed a positive trend of 3.36 MJ m −2 yr −1 (p<0.01), which is consistent with that of observed sunshine hours ( Figure 2B ).

The results of ANOVA analysis showed that there were significant differences in seed germination ( G max ) among treatments, from pH 4 to pH 10 levels (DF = 6, F = 2.890, p<0.05), and highly significant differences among four amaranth species (DF = 3, F = 74.070, p<0.01).

When compared with the control group, the increase of P1 larvae after 10 μM U0126 treatment was highly significant (p<0.01; Fig. 3G ).

Brucellosis herd transmission risk score Univariable ordinal analyses showed highly significant associations between the brucellosis herd transmission risk score with District and ‘Heard about human brucellosis’ (both P < 0.01).

The analysis also generated 214 canonical pathways among which 16 were highly significant (−Log ( p -value) >2.0, Table S8 ).

Inter-individual comparison between attention and stimulation-related audio-visual topographic correlations After conversion of correlations between auditory and visual-related current density distributions into Fisher's Z transforms, we performed paired t-tests that resulted in highly significant differences, both in the comparison between the transformed correlations in theta and beta1 bands (t = −2.99, p<0.01), and between the Fisher's Z scores averaged across theta and delta bands, and the scores averaged across beta1, beta2 and slow potentials (t = −5.885, p<0.0001).

The difference was highly significant ( Fig. 5 , C; ADAR2 siRNA, RI = 0.38±0.06, n = 14; scrambled siRNA, RI = 1.11±0.11, n = 12; p<.01).

This difference is highly significant for a one-way ANOVA test ( F (1, 97) = 13.79, p < .01).