Table 2 , which reports results of the X 2 -test of statistical significance of differences in the observed FoS values, shows that the observed differences are highly significant ( X 2 = 310.08; p<0.01). 3.2 Regression models Tables 3 – 5 present the estimated models.
Excerpts
If those tumors with high amount of benign tissue (carcinoma in benign tumors) and the carcinoma in situ were omitted from this analysis, the remaining 74 cases showed a highly significant deviation from benign controls (p<0.01).
In contrast, rHDL containing S1P had a highly significant, protective influence ex vivo , and in vivo (-50%, p<0.01).
Pearson’s correlation matrix for all soil sample counts (n = 27) shows significant (p < 0.05) and extremely significant (p < 0.01) associations between heavy metals.
The three-way interaction effects of years, varieties, and NPSB rates were highly significant (p ≤ 0.01), as shown in Tables 3 and 5 .
lnCatalase was associated with worse Reasoning (b = -.081, p < .001), but the associated p value from the multivariate test was only marginally significant at .051. lnUreA was associated with worse Reasoning (b = -.059, p < .01); the p value from the associated multivariate test was .049.
The values of F were gradually decreased from the first model (37.98) to the fifth model (19.38) and also they were all highly significant ( p <0.01) supporting them as the better models.
The number of individuals per month for June, July, August, September, and October was 405, 1390, 5226, 2573, and 781, respectively, and the difference between the months was extremely significant ( Fig 3 ) (P < 0.01), which is also related to the growth period of corn.
The change in DSi distribution is highly significant (p<0.01, using resampling and bootstrap percentile confidence intervals) and consistent with a critical role of α2-containing GABA A Rs in mediating DSCG directional tuning.
Results Taxonomic homogenization We found a highly significant difference (p<0.01) in dispersions between sites with a Manorina colony present and those without ( Table 3 ), with lower within-group dispersion for colonized sites ( Figure 2 ).
A 2–fold change expression cut-off for ratio experiments was applied together with anti-correlation of ratio profiles rendering the microarray analysis highly significant (P-value >0.01), robust and reproducible.
The incongruence test was highly significant for all datasets (p value <0.01, 100 permutations), with the exception of T. cruzi .
The tests assumed a null hypothesis, and the difference was considered statistically significant at p<0.05(**), and highly significant for p<0.01(***), but also a tendency to significance is pointed out if p<0.1(*).
In the group where the child’s nutritional status was normal, BAZ showed a significant trend according to maternal nutritional status ( p < 0.01).
All these p -values remain highly significant after Bonferroni-correction for the three-group comparisons for both independent experiments ( p <0.01) ( Table 1 ).
Inter-group or inter-time point difference was considered significant at P <0.05 and highly significant at P <0.01.
kaempferi , with highly significant correlation coefficients found for them ( p < 0.01) ( Table 3 ).
Ext t −1 and Ext t −3 are highly significant predictors of Ext t ; p-value <0.01 for the both predictors.
An increasing trend (rSp = 0.9273, p < 0.01) was found in the number of hedgehogs admitted to rescue centers during the monitored period.
For QTL of femurs of male mice, permutation tests indicated the following scores: suggestive likelihood ratio statistic (LRS) = 10.78, significant LRS = 17.96, and highly significant LRS = 21.46 (P≤0.01).
Most of these pair-wise comparisons continued to show an increase in similarity over time (e.g., 12 out of 15 for small mammals, 14 out of 15 for high visibility), and all p-values were highly significant (small: p = 0.0103; medium: p<0.0001; large: p = 0.0006; low visibility: p<0.0001; medium visibility: p = 0.0002; high visibility: p = 0.0006), indicating that variable sampling effort among different body sizes or visibility classes of mammals does not significantly influence our results.
Interestingly, the aforementioned 41 candidate genes identified by us had an overlap of 4 genes with the 438 genes, and the overlap was quite significant (p-value = 0.01057, Fisher's exact test).
The SNP was nominally significant in the discovery meta-analysis ( p = 0.011; Table S11 ); however, most studies reported a positive effect of the C allele– opposite to that reported by Nicolaou et al.
A highly significant correlation occurred between the frequencies and number of nonsynonymous changes in the Yangochiroptera and Rhinolophoidea (R = 0.83, P = 0.011; R = 0.90, P = 0.0065, respectively; Figure 2 ).
P200 There was a main effect of orientation ( F (1,17) = 28.09, p < .001, η 2 G = .120), a main effect of palate (F(1,17) = 18.06, p < .001, η 2 G = .017), and a near-significant orientation x palate interaction (F(1,17) = 8.06, p = .011, η 2 G = .005) on the amplitude of the P200.