For FGF23, the poorest cumulative survival was observed among patients with levels within the top tertile, with a log-rank test approaching significance (P = 0.05) ( Figure 2 ).
Excerpts
of borderline significancep = 0.050
Among CM CD4+ T cells, the relationship between MDA and P-STAT5 was of borderline significance (p = 0.050) when controlling for plasma HIV RNA copy numbers.
The significance level was considered as significant and extremely significant according to p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
We observe from Table 4 and Fig 2 that the factors with significant impact on PAT include only whether the match is post-season, which is of significance from the 0.01 to the 0.05 quantile, while there is a decreasing trend with respect to icing or timeouts (β 4 ) on scoring a PAT especially when facing a worse environmental situation over the 0.9 quantile ( p < 0.05).
The second study conducted in 1990 reported a significant trend of growing prevalence of Type B tympanograms with increasing numbers of smokers in the home (χ 2 = 4.15, p<0.05) [ 28 ].
A highly significant differences was found between Kuwaitis, Asians, Africans, southern Americans and the pacific islands (Papua New Guinea Tonga Fiji) populations p<0.05 [9] .
In addition, tumor size was positively correlated with Bcl-2 expression in luminal cells (r = 0.4; P<0.0001) and marginal significance was found for a negative correlation with Bax IRS scale in luminal cells (r = -0.2; P = 0.05).
Also, there was a highly significant relationship between soil R m and T a in different treatments of our experiments ( Table 3 , P<0.05).
Note: P<0.01 (highly significant, **); 0.01≤P<0.05 (significant, *).
The variable for moderator/developer is marginally significant in Model 1 (p < .05) but does not remain significant in Models 2-4 when the key explanatory variables are introduced.
There was also a statistical trend between urgency and EV on percentage bets (F (2,26) = 3.0, p = 0.05).
failed to reach significancep = .05
In the case of educational attainment, the partial biserial correlation failed to reach significance ( r = .27, p = .05).
First choice accuracy averaged across all sessions showed a mildly significant difference between strains (t(18) = 1.96; p<0.05, one-tailed).
The differences between Q1 group and Q2 group in Wbc count, Hb, Mono count, Eos count, BMI, waist, COPD, DM, CVD, hypertension, smoking status, asthma, stroke, race, education, and sex were statistically highly significant (all P < 0.05).
These relationships remained borderline significant (p = 0.05) in the model adjusted for the other SES-indicators.
Although, repeated measure ANOVAs did not reach statistical significance, area under the curve (AUC) of insulin secretion per islet was increased in HF islets ( p <0.05).
Furthermore, Group × Task-type × Time interaction was found to be marginally significant [F(1, 29) = 4.08, p = .05, η p 2 = .12], indicating that the group differences were most likely inconsistent across Task-type (i.e., shape classification vs. digit classification).
Mean glucose concentration within the first hour (Glu 0–1 h ) of PD fluid exchange was found to be higher in the high HbA1c group with marginal significance ( P = 0.05, Table 4 ).
The differences in sucrose contents between WT, pBI and AtbZIP53-ox lines were highly significant as calculated by Students t -test (* P <0.05; ** P <0.01).
The environmental variables NDWI and NDVI were also included in the multivariate regression given their near significance ( p = 0.05).
borderline significancep = 0.05
CMR Results Functional parameters There was a small change in end-diastolic volume ( Table 2 ), with borderline significance (p = 0.05) three hours after the shock.
There was a statistically significant moderate positive correlation between total brain volume (%ICV) and EZ-RPE volume in PD group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.482, P = .04), normal cognition control group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.514, P < .01) and a marginally significant moderate positive correlation in AD dementia group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.526, P = .05) ( Fig 3 ).
borderline significancep = .05
This method estimates the number of hypothetical unpublished studies with an average effect size of 0 which, if they were included in meta-analysis, would increase the p value for the meta-analysis to borderline significance ( p = .05).
Correlations between specific students’ achievement and matching intrinsic motivation were positive and statistically significant for mathematics and reading (.17, and .25 respectively), but nearly significant for science (.15, p < .05).
The interaction with marginal significance between insoles and slopes was found in the stance time ( p = 0.050).