Excerpts

Results Axial length Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant interaction between the type of defocus and time of measurement for axial length measures across the six defocus conditions (F (20,300) = 4.60, p < 0.0001).

When tumor burden (cell number) was plotted against serum S100A6 protein concentration in these animals, results indicated a highly significant correlation (r = 0.79, p<0.0001); serum S100A6 concentration was greater as the tumor burden increased over time for animals given SKOV-3-Luc ( Figure 6C ).

The logistic regression model was highly significant (p < 0.0001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.35).

The Ct values attained for the SARS-CoV-2 E gene using the AGPC method showed a highly significant correlation to those reported for the Cobas ® 6800 system (r = 0.97, p<0.0001) and the Maxwell ® instrument (r = 0.98, p<0.0001).

The difference in survival expectance between patients with high-risk score and low-risk score was highly significant (p<0.0001).

Demographic influencing factors A Kruskal Wallis ANVOA comparing Welfare Impaired scores between male intact, male neutered, female intact and female neutered dogs was highly significant (N = 1218, H = 28.89, p<0.0001).

We observed a highly significant difference between the distance traveled by P-42 and the distance traveled by any of the Aβ monomers, with P < 0.0001 for all three comparisons, respectively ( Fig 2F ).

This level of therapeutic efficacy was highly significant, with a Fisher’s exact test 95% CI range of 79.7–99.9% (p<0.0001).

Factor analysis of 251,877 interception data points produced a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of 0.726 (>0.5) and a highly significant result in Bartlett’s sphericity test ( P <0.0001).

Due to the large number of data sets in each population, both correlations were highly significant (p<0.0001), though data points are not fully independent.

When comparing “periphery” and “interior” patterns, the difference in radial distribution of DAO-5 was highly significant (Mann-Whitney test, p <0.0001).

This difference in fecundity between early and late female breeders was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

In GAPDH highly significant differences between all pairwise tissue comparisons were observed (p<0.0001), which supports the decision to abandon it as a reference gene in our study.

This strategy showed highly significant differences between FM patients and control subjects (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, for two separate control populations, respectively).

The backward logistic regression model ( Table 3 ) showed that the model was highly significant (p <0.0001, R squared 0.46).

Assessment of total GIPR protein levels in both males and female mice reflected the mRNA findings and depicted a highly significant decline in expression from P7 to P21 ( Fig 2H and 2K , males p<0.0001, females p<0.0001). 2.5 Correlations of protein expression with glucose levels and body weight To determine a potential role or link between receptor expression in the hypothalamus and functions in physiology in development, we analyzed correlations between postnatal blood glucose and body weight in males and females combined.

Both fungal strains (S2 and S3) caused a highly significant mortality to the ants when applied at high doses in the challenge ( Fig. 1 and Table 1 ; C-C vs C-S2, early challenge: d.f. = 3.9, P <0.0001, late challenge: d.f. = 3.3, P <0.001; C-C vs C-S3, early challenge: d.f. = 5.1, P <0.00001, late challenge: d.f. = 4.1, P <0.0001).

The postoperative volumes in the placebo and nucleoplasty groups were 1.078 ml (SD: 0.350 ml) and 0.906 ml (SD: 0.287 ml) respectively; the difference is highly significant (p<0.0001) ( Fig. 4 ).

In contrast, cells treated with DMSO showed a marked and highly significant inhibition of proliferation, with a reduced mean count of 379,333 ± 23 (*** P < 0.0001) as compared to untreated cells.

Here the application of CRMP-5 led to a highly significant increase in the amount of RGCs (p<0.0001).

A highly significant association ( p <0.0001) between reduced amounts of vaginal lactobacilli (< 10 4 cfu/swab) and the presence of genital tract pathogens was found in the female study population ( Fig 3A ).

When adjusted for multiple comparisons with Bonferroni's correction (for n = 429 known SNPs), our finding for rs113831133 did not reach statistical significance (required P value <0.0001).

Differences between vaccinated groups and non-vaccinated animals were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001).

For example, Fig 5 shows one example of a highly significant relationship between the date and phi (β = 1.779, p<0.0001).

The difference between the microbiome profiles of these groups was highly significant ( p = 0.0001, F = 13.75) ( Fig 5B ).