Furthermore, a highly significant ( P <0.0001) correlation between maximal efficacy and log potency of dexamethasone-mediated repression amongst genes was observed, thus confirming this observation ( Figure 2D , Table S3 ).
Excerpts
A two-way ANOVA revealed a lack of effect of treatment and interaction, but a highly significant effect of time in both regions (F (5,81) = 9.82, p<0.0001 NAc; F (5,69) = 5.83, p = 0.0002 CP).
When the areas of H-reflexes (averaged daily) elicited by single and burst stimuli were compared these differences were highly significant ( Sign and Wilcoxon tests, P<0.0001) indicating that burst stimulation attenuated by about 50% the area of H-reflexes elicited by single pulses.
Dance-compound introduction resulted in a highly significant increase in the number of dance bouts versus the solvent control (t = 5.16, d.f. = 39, Tukey-Kramer adjusted p<0.0001).
There was an overall weak, albeit highly significant, correlation between the sCD26 concentration and the DPPIV activity ( r s = 0.35, P = 0.0001, n = 150).
A simple regression of ranks of male participants and female participants in the couples’ group showed a highly significant positive relationship, R = .997, Y = 0.14+0.97, F(1,6) = 105.7, p<.0001, confirming that the preference for the different morphs were nearly identical for both sexes.
Correlations between both (log transformed) measures of movement were highly significant (p<0.0001) in all deer and correlation coefficients ( r ) ranged between 0.36 and 0.73 ( table 2 ).
The χ 2 testing of the frequencies of ABVIs in individuals with TB as the cause of death and individuals with NTB causes of death revealed a statistically extremely significant difference between the two groups (χ 2 = 18.357, df = 1, P<0.0001).
There is no consensus on how p-values should be estimated for linear mixed models, but following the t-statistics obtained from using the Satterthwaite’s method, the effect of the participant’s role (whether proposer or recipient) was highly significant (p < 0.0001) whereas the effect of the depression diagnosis and the role:depression interaction were not.
Highly significant relationships were identified for both parameters ( P <.0001).
Whereas correlations of PPAS-6 and PPAS-3 scores with job control at the within-subgroup level (r within ) were highly significant (p < .0001) according to both the R statistic and t-test, such correlations at the between-subgroup level (r between ) were not significant (p>.05). “ S2 Table ” in the supplement/appendix outlines the key indices of within-subgroup variability and interrater agreement in PPAS-6 and PPAS-3 scores among the same validation population subgroups used to assess factor invariance.
As shown in the last column of Table 3 , the instrument is highly significant ( p-value<0 . 0001 ) and positively associated with the spending on the anti-ACA advertisements.
Myostatin inhibition had no significant effect on BMD from DEXA either on the ground or in flight; however, time following launch was highly significant (p < 0.0001) and time was interactive with spaceflight (p < 0.0001) but not myostatin inhibition treatment.
Experiments that supplemented carotenoids rather than correlations with concentrations of carotenoids in blood resulted in significantly larger effect sizes (p = 0.006), but an analysis without the supplementation studies still yielded a highly significant overall effect size ( table 2 , p<0.0001).
3b) , which is highly significant for CCL4 (p<0.0001, post test for linear trend).
aegypti genes are without introns compared to 33% of the EZGs, and this difference is highly significant (P<0.0001).
By contrast, intergroup comparisons revealed that the differences between groups A and B regarding LTP and neurogenesis were consistently highly significant (LTP, t test, P = 0.0001; chi-square test, P = 0.0028; neurogenesis, t test, P = 0.0002; chi-square test, P = 0.006) confirming that the patterns are indeed different.
A difference from global connectivity is that in this case the difference between healthy and control subjects is clearly significant (p-value < 0.0001).
Only 10 of 68 species were found on both sides of this divide, and ANOSIM showed that this grouping was highly significant (ANOSIM; R = 0.97, p = 0.0001), with the shallower features more similar to each other (ANOSIM; R = 0.43, p = 0.01) than the deeper features were (ANOSIM; R = 0.87, p = 0.1).
After adjustment for the residual confounders, TAVI as compared with conservative management was associated with highly significant risk reduction for all-cause death and HF hospitalization (HR 0.46, 95%CI, 0.32–0.69, P = 0.0001, and HR 0.25, 95%CI 0.16–0.40, P<0.0001) ( Table 2 ).
One-way ANOVA shows a highly significant difference between Fgr, Fyn, Hck and Lyn expression levels relative to Blk (p < 0.0001), while Src, Yes and Lck are not significantly different ( Fig 1A ).
In both analyses, the duration effect was highly significant ( Fig 10A : χ 2 = 17.7, df = 1, P < 0.0001; Fig 10B : χ 2 = 12.1, df = 1, P < 0.0001), and showed that probability of plant infection increased with increasing duration of E1 events.
Statistical analysis using Mann Whitney test showed that the differences between control and treated groups were highly significant with P value <0.0001 in all cases ( Figure 6 ).
This was highly significant ( p <0.0001).
A scatter plot of PIP expression versus that of the PIP-activated metagene across 557 BCa tumors revealed a highly significant positive correlation (r 2 = 0.4; p <0.0001), suggesting that in a clinical setting, PIP most likely regulates genes comprising the PIP-activated metagene as defined in the T47D/shPIP dox culture system ( Figure 2B ).