Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

a trend towards significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Importantly, in a multivariate analysis, the non-fasting genomic signature showed a trend towards significance in influencing ovarian cancer patient survival (HR = 1.45, p = 0.06), independent of age and cancer stage, underscoring its potential as an additional and independent prognostic factor for ovarian cancer patients.
marginally significantp = .0601.2× alphagold
Although quite less than these studies, our model predicted only 10.7% of total intention, including the BFSN, showed the likely trait (marginally significant; p = .060; Table 3 ), so we included it in the model with further adjustment, and it was significant (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.01–2.71; Table 4 ).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In the second session, we observed a nearly significant relation between Stimulus Intensity, Attention Condition and Individual Training Time for the post-post2 group, F (1,11) = 4.4, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.28, but we found no relation between Individual Training Time and Stimulus Intensity when separate tests were performed per attention condition ( p > 0.35).
nearly significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Item 1 showed nearly significant illusionary effects in the minimum delay condition (score = 1.00±1.57, t(17) = 2.70, P = 0.06, corrected; P<0.01, uncorrected), but failed to show differences between conditions (F(5, 85) = 0.37, P>0.1).
Of them, two studies reported PE risk according to upper quartile versus lower quartile of third-trimester plasma TGF-β 1 (OR = 7.2, 95% CI [2.2, 23.8] and OR = 2.5, 95% CI [1.2, 5.6]); In the study reporting the after-delivery plasma TGF-β 1 level [21] , maternal plasma TGF-beta 1 concentrations were higher in cases than in controls, falls just short of standard levels of statistical significance (23.2±1.3 versus 20.3±1.0 ng/ml, p = 0.06; OR = 2.5, 95% CI [1.2, 5.6], upper quartile versus lower quartile).
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
A generalized mixed effects regression analysis with number of self-referent word stimuli recalled as the negative binomial outcome variable and drift rate and stimuli valence as independent variables found a marginally significant interaction, β = −0.10, 95% CI [-0.21, 0.004], z = −1.89, p = .06.
tended towards significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Although the proportion of commentators who stated that a loris was venomous in March 2011 was not significantly higher than previous months (χ 2 = 0.44, df = 1, p = 0.51), it tended towards significance after the January 2012 spike and the airing of Jungle Gremlins of Java (χ 2 = 3.4, df = 1, p = 0.06).
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
While there was a marginally significant correlation between the two outcome variables ( r = .32, p = .06), a sobel test [43] showed that the effect of social comparison (dummy coded as −2 for same-gender comparison, and +1 for opposite-gender and no comparison control) on visual self-representation was not mediated by explicit self-ratings, z = .84, p = .40.