Barely Significant
← all phrases

tended towards significance

30 sentences · 30 papers · 178 search hits before verification

In the literature

tended towards significancep = 0.0521.0× alpha
Although a three-way interaction between task, drink type and the logarithm of the presented duration only tended towards significance (χ 2 (1) = 3.766, p = 0.052), comparison of slopes for the two temporal tasks indicated a difference between slopes in the explicit, but not implicit, onset task (explicit: BAL – APTD, difference in effect = 0.2928 (SE = 0.143), z-ratio = 2.044, p < 0.05; implicit: BAL – APTD, difference in effect = − 0.0981 (SE = 0.141), z-ratio = − 0.694, p = 0.4877).
tended towards significancep=0.0551.1× alpha
The difference in per-lesion detection rates between 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT and other functional imaging modalities reached statistical significance except for 18 F-FDA PET or PET/CT (90% [45/50], 95% CI 78.2–96.7%, p=0.055), which tended towards significance (p=0.055). 18 F-FDG PET/CT performed the worst in comparison to all other functional imaging modalities.
tended towards significancep = 0.0631.3× alpha
On the contrary, the negative correlation between saturated fatty acid intake and cholesterol distribution in large HDL-subfractions was not significant ( p = 0.103), while it tended towards significance for the intake of monounsaturated fatty acids ( p = 0.063) ( Table 5 ).
tended towards significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Multivariate Test Regarding the 92 chicks subjected to the multivariate test, we found negative and significative correlations between the range visits and the distance index during P1 and the time birds spent in the inner circle (rho = -0.23, p = 0.02 and rho = -0.21, p = 0.04, respectively), while these correlations tended towards significance when considering the total number of range visits (rho = -0.18, p = 0.07).
tended towards significanceP = 0.0811.6× alpha
Among the traditional risk factors for PPM implantation, our study found that the odds of pacemaker placement in patients with prior RBBB was 3.73 (95%CI: 1.92-7.26; P < 0.001) times those without prior RBBB in the unadjusted model which tended towards significance following multivariate analysis (aOR: 2.15; 95%CI: 0.91-5.09; P = 0.081).
tended towards significancep = 0.0911.8× alpha
The effect of interaction between the variables vaccine type and condition was not statistically significant, although the difference in the evaluation of willingness to vaccinate with either Vaccine 1 or Vaccine 2 tended towards significance when participants were exposed to the infection frame compared to the hospitalization frame (B = 0.63, 95% CI [−0.10, 1.36], t(107) = 1.70, p = 0.091) (see also Figure 3 ). 3.2.