Excerpts

Gene E1 showed marginal significance at the level of 0.1 (p value = 0.09).

Statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05 and a statistical trend was defined as 0.05 < p ≤ 0.09.

When comparing response indices after the first to the ones after the second immunization in the PEV301 50 μg groups, the difference was borderline significant (p = 0.09) indicating that the initial response was possibly boosted by the second administration.

Smaller NV of right hippocampus displayed a nonsignificant trend to be correlated with worse non-dominant hand performance on 9HPT (r = - 0.24, p = 0.09).

Patients showed a trend towards a greater rate of anti-saccade errors ( p = 0.09) compared to controls.

While there is a modest trend toward significance (p = 0.0902), the analysis of our data yields slope constants that do not vary (and thus the difference from zero does not further approach significance) even with increased years of analysis under the model.

Moreover, MANOVA revealed an almost significant difference in the overall level of activity between pre- and post-injection (main effect of Time: Wilks' lambda = 0.3944, df = 1,15, p = 0.0909).

Female patients had a strong trend towards a shorter time to PMs ( P = 0.091).

The Ewens-Watterson test did not reveal significant differences from neutral expectations, although the difference between the observed and expected homozygosity statistics was found to be greater, but only marginally significant ( P = 0.091) in the Galápagos penguin ( Table 4 ).

The main effect of Reading Time was marginally significant, χ 2 (1) = 2.85, p = .091.

However, a marginally significant association was shown between non-participation in hobby groups and the FL3 respondents, which is similar to the results from Model 1 ( p = 0.091).

These results were significant for the combined data for day 3 and 7 ( p = 0.017; one-tailed paired t-test), for day 7 alone ( p = 0.044; one-tailed paired t-test) and approached significance for day 3 ( p = 0.091; one-tailed paired t-test).

The frequency of CCH participants experiencing severe impact of headache was marginally higher compared with that of ECH participants; the difference was marginally insignificant (100.0% vs. 81.3%, p = 0.091).

There was also a marginally significant main effect of success for FC between the right dlPFC and the right parietal ROI ( F (1,18) = 9.63, p = .091, η 2 = 0.342).

RF demonstrated an increasing trend between T1 and T3 (p = 0.091, d = 0.41, Table 6 ).

The correlation between each bird’s mean latency to innovate and its reversal score for the first reversal was in the same negative direction, but fell just short of significance (N = 18, Spearman’s rho = −0.410, P = 0.091).

The model showed only a marginal trend for predicting spatial advantage, F(1, 74) = 2.93, p = .091, R 2 = .038, with an unstandardized coefficient (β) of −.075 (p = .091).

The only difference was that for children who scored in the upper half at T1, the reduction in sympathy from T1 to T2 was only marginally significant, p = .091.

A weak trend towards a trial by genotype effect was detected (F[2,41]=4.20; p=0.091), post hoc tests however did not reveal any significant effects.

However, these differences are not significant in either treatment individually (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, p > 0.20), and jointly the difference is only weakly significant (p ≈ 0.091).

Interestingly, in two studies by Harrison and her colleagues [35] – [36] people with AN performed poorer than healthy controls on the RME task, while in a further work [37] these authors found only a statistical trend ( p = .091) toward a significant difference between AN patients of the restrictive subtype and healthy controls and no difference for the binge-purge subtype.

Correlation between foal age in hours and SI was not significant but had a positive trend (r = 0.512; p = 0.091) ( Fig 3 ).

Lateral VOT also showed a trend toward a significant main effect of repetition, [F(1,15) = 3.27, p = 0.091].

The marginal significance of the corrected permutated p -value was observed for SRC rs6122566 ( p = 0.0918) but all FDR p -values in all genetic models were not significant ( p >0.2) ( Table S2 ).

In separate linear regression analyses on the effects of typical and atypical antipsychotic medication, the annual reduction in brain volume was predicted by exposure to both types of antipsychotic medication with a high level of significance for atypical antipsychotic medication (atypical beta = −0.54, t = −3.53, p = 0.001) and a marginal significance for typical antipsychotic medication (typical beta = −0.298, t = −1.74, p = 0.092).