The post-hoc test revealed that the reaction time for highly significant words ( M = 816.39, SEM = 29.95) was significantly shorter than for both low significant words ( M = 835.69, SEM = 32.08; t (34) = -3.976, p < .001, d = 1.36) and for medium significant words ( M = 825.91, SEM = 30.68; t (34) = -2.42, p = .04, d = 0.83).
Excerpts
There were highly significant differences (p<0.001; ANOVA) in FFEs between the tested masks.
The 2-way ANOVA confirmed a highly significant effect of time for NW and SS ( Fig 2 and Table 1 , p < 0.001).
Interestingly, we found PTEN expression in exosomes from all PC patients, and no PTEN expression in the exosomes from the blood of the normal subjects ( Figure 6 A, B); t-test analysis showed the results were highly significant P<0.001.
For the entire set of 389 articles, the correlation between the logarithm of the number of edits and the imbalance of an article is r (387) = -.51 and statistically highly significant, p < .001.
The score on the BAHPHL was also a highly significant parameter for HP use ( p <0.001).
The difference between the three populations is clearly significant according to the ANOVA test ( P <0.001).
Sex, agro-ecology, location, and the interaction of sex and location had a highly significant (p<0.001) effect on all body measurements.
Increased sunniness had a highly significant effect on the rate of bumblebees reported (P<0.001; Fig 3C ); with an almost doubling for counts taking place in full sun compared to counts taking place during no sun.
However, the effect of variety on fresh weight was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating that background genetics played a stronger role than salinity treatment on fresh weight.
Pooled data from three independent experiments revealed highly significant inhibition (p<0.001) as measured by slope, max-min and AUC analysis ( Figure 4C-E ).
In the M1 cortex, this increase in neuronal density was accompanied by a highly significant thinning of both the M1 (F(Genotype) 1,31 = 67.164, p<.001; Fig. 7F ) and somatosensory (S1) cortex (F(Genotype) 1,30 = 41.368, p<.001).
Therefore, the Chi2 test was highly significant ( P <0.001) and the I2 statistic was 98.8%.
As such, there was a highly significant effect among sites within exposure (F 4, 30 = 10.1, p<0.001) but no significant difference in overall density of colonies of Acropora spp. between exposures (F 1, 30 = 0.8, p>0.10).
The canonical correlations of the Discriminant Function Analysis were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and 94.8% of the cells were correctly reclassified in the resulting clusters.
showed a trendp< 0.001
However, when compared with healthy controls, we found that the patients with CFEOM1 showed a trend of ALFF increase (p< 0.001, uncorrected) in the right inferior parietal lobe and right frontal cortex and also a trend of ReHo increase (p<0.001 uncorrected) in the left precentral gyrus, left orbital frontal cortex, temporal pole and the posterior division of cingulate gyrus ( Table 3 and Fig 3 ).
However, after two-stage propensity score calibration ( Table 4 ), the impact of SAMA on stroke risk did not reach statistical significance, while the adjusted HR for stroke was increased to 1.67 (95% CI 1.45–1.91, p < 0.001) with the use of SABA.
This model had little explanatory power and a poor fit, as is common for bivariate logistic regression (McFadden’s Pseudo R 2 0.039, AUC 0.697, and a highly significant Hoslem’s test p<0.001).
Results which were statistically highly significant were presented as p < .001, for all other significant results the exact p-values was given.
All of these correlations were highly significant ( p < .001).
This interaction was highly significant ( Table 2 , χ 2 1,10 = 357.6, p < 0.001).
However, the reason for hospitalization had a highly significant impact on mobility outcomes ( p < 0.001), with respiratory and neurological conditions posing the greatest barriers.
The intercept, representing the baseline use of novel forms for the reference category ‘Greece’, was estimated at -4.774 with a highly significant p-value (p <.001).
Difference in survival between the genotypes (R) and (S) in the deltamethrin treated group was highly significant (Pearson’s chi squared; p<0.001, Table 5 ).
Statistical analysis was done using unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction as appropriate and defined as significant (* p<0.05), very significant (** p<0.01) and extremely significant (***, p<0.001).