Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

nearly significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In addition, a nearly significant and positive three-way interaction of (group [Active tACS] × session [3]) × MoCA (beta = 3.26, 95% CI [− 0.01, 6.53], t(811) = 1.95, p = 0.051; Std. beta = 0.11, 95% CI [− 4.65e−04, 0.23]) indicated higher offline visuomotor learning 3 months after treatment in participants with lower MoCA from the active tACS group compared to those from the sham tACS group (Fig. 4 b).
a strong trendp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Notably, the long-term SDM PI during the first 5 min was significantly different from the chance level in both genotypes [t (7) = 12.79, p < 0.0001, t (7) = 6.97, p < 0.001 for WT and AS respectively in one sample t-test], but the PI of the WT showed a strong trend for being higher than that of the AS [t (14) = 2.13, p = 0.051 in unpaired t-test] (Fig. 4 d).
marginally significantp = .0511.0× alphagold
The two conditions with potential ostensive cues (Nodding and Nodding with direct gaze) resulted in marginally significant gaze following and medium effect sizes ( t (21) = 1.715, p = .051, d = 0.75, t (21) = 1.699, p = .052, d = 0.74, respectively).
Is ostension any more than attention?
Sci Rep · 2014 · PMC4058873
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Moreover, the simple main effects of flow direction on the 4–6- and 7–9-month-old infants and on the adults were significant ( F (1,114) = 26.52, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.19; F (1,114) = 19.71, p < 0.001 , η p 2 = 0.15; and F (1,114) = 10.75, p = 0.002 , η p 2 = 0.09; respectively); it was marginally significant on the 10–12-month-olds ( F (1,114) = 3.89, p = 0.051 , η p 2 = 0.13).