Cases using end-to-end arterial anastomosis tended to show a higher rate of initial hyperemia than those using end-to-side, which difference was marginally significant ( p value = 0.055).
Excerpts
There was no main effect of condition, p = 0.802, η p 2 < 0.01, but there was a marginally significant interaction effect, F( 1, 156) = 3.733, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.023, because while participants in both conditions rated their likelihood of becoming an alcoholic as lower at post-test than at pre-test, the decrease was greater in the No-Education condition (mean post-test vs. pre-test difference of 10.29, t (78) = 3.59, p < 0.001, d = 0.41) than in the Alternative-Cause condition (mean post-test vs. pre-test difference of 3.68, t (78) = 1.98, p = 0.051, d = 0.22).
Notably, the left parietal inferior region showed a significant correlation during action observation ( r = 0.48, p = 0.041), and a marginally significant correlation during action execution ( r = 0.39, p = 0.055).
showed a trendp = 0.055
Although no variables reached statistical significance, CHD1L expression showed a trend toward association with advanced pathologic T stage ( p = 0.055), history of undescended testis ( p = 0.058), and lymphovascular invasion ( p = 0.095).
There was no difference in the total relative abundance of OTUs (Supplementary Information 1 , 2 and 3 ), but there was an indication that the microbiome diversity may have been increased in the group of T1D mothers suggested by marginally significant Simpson diversity index (Fig. 1 , F (1,14) = 4.36 , P = 0.055).
The main effect for group was marginally significant (F (2,58) = 3.046, p = 0.055, partial η 2 = 0.095).
This was measured in both groups and found to be reduced in the Cfh −/− mice by 30% compared to C57BL/6 controls, although this just failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.055).
The interaction between system use and arousal level was marginally significant (p = 0.055), nevertheless, its addition to the model accounted for a significant 5% increase in the variance of ARSQ.
The percentage of esophagus volume receiving ≥30 Gy (V30) was at the limit of significance (p = 0.055).
showed a trendp = 0.055
with D-CATH-2 showed a trend towards a lower MLS (p = 0.055).
russatus females exposed to blue ALAN were significantly higher ( P < 0.05) and marginally significant in females exposed to white light ( P = 0.055) compared to controls (Fig. 3 C).
borderline significanceP = 0.055
Ethnic distribution showed a prevalence of Caucasians at 78.12% (n = 3149), with borderline significance noted across groups ( P = 0.055).
close to significancep = 0.055
In addition, the difference between contrast thresholds estimated in the collinear and orthogonal configurations at 4 cpd for 12λ was close to significance ( t (9) = −2.20, p = 0.055, d = 0.69).
Both alpha-diversity metrics were nearly significant for the experimental outcome (p-value = 0.055) of A. palmata , with visually unaffected and diseased corals showing higher diversity measurements compared to controls.
showed a trendp =.055
Conversely, at 90% morphing (anger-dominant), the EG showed a trend toward enhanced recognition (d=-0.19, 95% CI [-0.38, 0.00], p =.055).
Leaf size had a marginally significant influence ( F = 6.68 , p = 0.055 ) for T. serratus R., but extraction duration had no significant effect ( p = 0.494 ).
In Step 2, after adding TNFR1 to the model alongside IL-1β, the coefficient for IL-1β increased to 13.364, approaching significance ( p = 0.055) with a very high OR of 636868.535.
showed a trendP = 0.055
The expression of Neurog2 and Ascl1 significantly increased by release from thymidine block (DIV1T vs WO1/WO2) and the expression of Gfap showed a trend to increase after release (DIV1T vs WO2, P = 0.055) (Fig. 4 D).
borderline significancep = 0.055
By adjusting for age at death, sex, heart weight, CAS and CM, there was a borderline significance of the association between pSBV and SCD risk (OR:1.20, 95%CI:1.00-1.44, p = 0.055).
just failed to reach significancep = 0.055
The two correlations were 0.234 and 0.057, which was in the predicted direction, but the difference just failed to reach significance ( p = 0.055) (significance in this case and the case below was calculated taking into account the fact that the two correlations have a variable in common, in this case TFS 50 ). r (FM2 vs DLF) should be greater than r (FM20 vs DLF).
Hs-CRP is nearly significant but poorly co-related with a total length of the stent (r2 = 0.14, p = 0.055) but not (negatively) with a total number of the stent (r2 = -0.07, p = 0.5).
showed a trendp = 0.055
However, sdLDL to total LDL ratio was not different between the two groups, whereas lbLDL percentage showed a trend towards higher values FH group compared to controls (p = 0.055) (Table 2 ).
In the present study, medical staff demonstrated slightly higher total concern score regarding the use of AI in medical education and research compared with students, with the difference approaching significance ( p = 0.055) which was in line with Abokresha et al. 12 .
However, only the difference between neutral and social conditions was statistically marginally significant ( z = 1.91, p = 0.055).
approached significancep = 0.055
The comparison of the two conditions in which subjects walked with no load impedance parameters with and without load approached significance (p = 0.055), and all other comparisons were statistically insignificant (p > 0.200).