Fitting a quasibinomial GLM (dispersion = 5.47) showed the increase in M1% with generation number was significant for females (estimate: 0.37, t = 2.28, df = 6, p < 0.05) and bordered on significance for males (estimate: 0.28, t = 1.78, df = 6, p = 0.06).
One-year follow-up Fibroid recurrence rates showed a trend toward lower rates in the 3D model group compared to the control group (1/55 [1.8%] vs. 7/55 [12.7%]; P = 0.060), approaching but not reaching statistical significance.
Supporting the consistency of this finding, an equivalent relation was found for L DLPFC activations, although these activations were only marginally significant with P = 0.06 (FWE corrected, cluster level threshold).
Between-group differences were not observed for any other measures; however, PSS for the audiovisual speech TOJ task was noteworthy in its marginally significant group differences (p = 0.06, Table 1 ) between CI users and controls (−78.2 ms and −7.83 ms, respective means), which is consistent with the PSS shift observed in response to the SJ speech task.
An effect close to significance was found for the interaction between distance and type of stimulation [F (1,27) = 3.8, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.12].
Across both groups, dorsal striatal D2R BP ND was greater than ventral striatal BP ND at a marginally significant level (dorsal mean BP ND = 4.09, S.D. = 0.52; ventral mean BP ND = 2.08, S.D. = 0.29; F 1,33 = 3.87, p = 0.06) and there was no significant interaction between group and striatal region ( F 1,33 = 1.98, p = 0.17).
As with the preliminary signature from the broad-spectrum analysis, in our model, animals from the 20 Gy group were less distinguishable from the others although the AUC was close to significance ( p-value = 0.06).
For faster participants, significant correlations between the means for the solo and paired conditions were observed for 120 bpm, r (12) = 0.64, p = 0.03, and 200 bpm, r (12) = 0.79, p < 0.01, while a marginally significant correlation was observed for 75 bpm, r (12) = 0.56, p = 0.06.
Considering only well-known, classical risk factors in ES 25 (presented in Table 2 ), only patient gender had a significant impact on 3 yrs survival: Overall survival (p = 0.01) in the univariate analysis and nearly significant on progression-free survival at 3 yrs (p = 0,06).
Simple effect tests demonstrated a significant difference between driving modes at stage 1, p = 0.004, and a significant trend at stage 2, p = 0.060.
5E ) sc-inulin fed mice showed a decreasing trend in the levels of chenodeoxycholic (CDCA, P = 0.06), deoxycholic acid (DCA, P = 0.06) and higher level of β-muricholic acid (β-MCA, P = 0.08, Fig. 5E ).
The ToM → EC model had the smallest AIC (2180.92, all other models > 2182) and SABIC (2182.69, all others > 2184), along with a marginally significant Chi-square difference test result ( p =.06).
4 B, Pearson’s correlation = 0.51, p = 0.061), and an increasing trend in the percent CD4+ CD45RA+ naïve T-cells post-supplement (Fig. 4 C, Pearson’s correlation = 0.50, p = 0.060), and a significantly lower CD4+ CD45RO+: CD4+ CD45RA+ T-cell ratio after supplementation (Fig. 4 D, Pearson’s correlation = 0.67, p = 0.008).
The PwPD group showed poorer, nearly significant acquisition scores in the GS-RAVLT (H(2) = − 1.8, p = 0.06) and significant results for the VR-RAVLT (H(2) = − 2.5, p = 0.01).
Furthermore, there was significantly higher vegetation cover at collapsed burrows than at fresh burrows in the semi-arid savannah site (Chi 2 = 7.71, p < 0.05), and a marginally significant difference between the burrow age classes in the mesic grassland (Chi 2 = 5.62, p = 0.06, Supplementary Table S.1 ).
A paired t -test revealed a difference in lateralization accuracy between AcOH ( M = 96.43%, SEM = 1.69%) and EA ( M = 84.52%, SEM = 5.09%) with a trend towards significance ( t (13) = 2.04, p = 0.06), see Fig. 3 .
However, here the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).
Baseline visual acuity was similar between groups (0.6 ± 0.6 vs 0.6 ± 0.6 logMAR, P = 0.92), while central macular thickness showed a trend toward difference (368.7 ± 172.0 vs 398.0 ± 169.4 μm, P = 0.06) (Table 1 ).
4 , this area was found marginally significant (p = 0.06) different between PCS with no depression (n = 18) and PCS with moderate/severe depression (n = 14) and also when comparing each of these two groups with the healthy control group (p = 0.08).
Analyses of variance showed marginally significant less differentiation of US-expectancies in the Probe compared to the No probe condition (Stimulus × Trial × Condition: F( 1,17) = 4.04, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.19; Fig. 2 ).
However, in scenario B, the difference between GU and AM at post-assessment was only borderline significant, ( t (99) = 1.90, p = 0.06, d = 0.50) (see Supplementary Table S24 for a summary of the contrast analyses).
Male mice in VCR group showed a trend of increased bladder wet weight compared to the control group (36.0 ± 3.0 vs. 29.6 ± 1.8 mg, p = 0.06), but not in female mice (16.6 ± 0.8 vs. 17.6 ± 1.0 mg, p = 0.43) (Fig. 1 C).
When analysed by multiple regression, yoga treatment was found to be 10-fold (OR = 10.20, 95% CI = 0.69–174.19) borderline significant (P = 0.060) and ~8-fold (OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.02–33.49), statistically significant (P = 0.003), effective towards attaining the favourable composite ADA score 1 and 2, respectively (Table 2 ).
In HC, the opposite pattern emerged, with marginally significant negative correlations between learning from negative feedback and ∆FRN in the first ( r = −0.347 , p = 0.060) and the second half ( r = −0.350 , p = 0.058) of the observation condition, but not the control condition ( r = −0.155 , p = 0.412 and r = −0.275 , p = 0.142, respectively).
The trend for the opposite mating type version MATα was similar, however, we found marginally significant differences in this case ( p -value = 0.06, Student t-test).