Excerpts

When compared differences between Hr-AD and Lr-AD, Hr-AD showed higher elevation of SA rate than Lr-AD with marginal significance (P = 0.06), and it did not show difference in RI between the groups. rTMS increases dopamine concentration and expression of dopamine receptor 4 in AD mouse AD is characterised by markedly reduced concentration of neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine and glutamate in hippocampus and neocortex 31 .

Baseline visual acuity was similar between groups (0.6 ± 0.6 vs 0.6 ± 0.6 logMAR, P = 0.92), while central macular thickness showed a trend toward difference (368.7 ± 172.0 vs 398.0 ± 169.4 μm, P = 0.06) (Table 1 ).

9 with event-free survival at a borderline significance ( p = 0.06, Supplementary Fig. 9A) and statistically significant difference in overall survival ( p = 0.034, Supplementary Fig. 9B).

One-year follow-up Fibroid recurrence rates showed a trend toward lower rates in the 3D model group compared to the control group (1/55 [1.8%] vs. 7/55 [12.7%]; P = 0.060), approaching but not reaching statistical significance.

Although post hoc testing identifies marginally non-significant differences in lag time between control and treatments in “Antarctica 3” ( p = 0.06), possibly suggesting greater initial resistance to exposure to CHX, the overall shape of the response was visually very similar to that of strains “Antarctica 1” and “Antarctica 2”.

The association with mortality was marginally non-significant (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.99–1.48, P = 0.06).

Absolute standardized discordance (| d |), however, did not depend on F tissue (GAMM: F = 0.075, p = 0.786), while our data suggest that it may be related (with marginal significance) to trout density (GAMM: F = 3.781, p = 0.060; Table 2 ), with lower discordances associated with higher trout density (Fig. 3 B).

In females, no significant change in the expression of these five genes could be observed, although almost significant increases were observed for Cd36 in the PFC (p = 0.06) and Tmem119 in the striatum (p = 0.06).

Tissue fraction showed marginal significance ( p = 0.06), suggesting that its variable composition can influence efficiency under certain operating conditions.

The trend was most prominent at 3 months, where the AUC difference between age groups approached significance ( p = 0.06).

However, in scenario B, the difference between GU and AM at post-assessment was only borderline significant, ( t (99) = 1.90, p = 0.06, d = 0.50) (see Supplementary Table S24 for a summary of the contrast analyses).

Among non-microscopic surgeons, satisfaction after SMILE was greater than with contact lenses ( p = 0.001) and showed a trend versus spectacles ( p = 0.060).

For the non-microscopic surgeon group, SMILE satisfaction was significantly higher than contact lenses (Z = −3.235, p = 0.001), though the difference with glasses approached significance (Z = −1.884, p = 0.060) (Table 6 ).

The Poisson mixed model exploring the number of central details recalled 1 week after encoding revealed a marginally significant main effect of age group ( β = 0.21, SE = 0.11, χ 2 (1) = 3.55, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.43], p = 0.06), with a tendency of young adults reporting more central details than older adults, and a main effect of recall type ( β = − 0.61, SE = 0.04, χ 2 (1) = 184.10, 95% CI [− 0.69, − 0.52], p < 0.001; See Table 2 for mean values), with participants recalling more central details for videos recalled multiple times than only once.

Moreover, increasing age was a marginally significant predictive factor of OS ( P = 0.06).

However, in children, the effect of Incentive during the cue phase just failed to reach significance ( p = 0.06).

However, there is a marginal trend of statistical significance for strain factor (F (1, 47) = 3.705, p = 0.06).

The ToM → EC model had the smallest AIC (2180.92, all other models > 2182) and SABIC (2182.69, all others > 2184), along with a marginally significant Chi-square difference test result ( p =.06).

However, a trend towards significance was observed for the SRS motivation subscale score, representing less impairment in social motivation at the end of the intervention ( t (19) = 1.97, p = 0.06, d = 0.42).

Compared with patients with > 2.00 g/dL of serum albumin concentration, those with 1.01–1.50 g/dL had a significantly lower cumulative probability of remission (P = 0.046) and those with ≤ 1.00 g/dL had lower cumulative probability of remission at marginally significant level (P = 0.060).

Conversely, leopards showed an almost significant negative effect on chacma baboon activity at dawn (β = -1.7 ± 0.9, p = 0.06; Fig. 5 B).

5 a), whereas the CIRCLE condition showed only a marginal trend ( P = 0.06, Unc, around 600 ms post-onset; Fig. 5 b).

Pairwise comparisons within the placebo group showed a marginally significant reduction between 48 and 72 weeks ( p = 0.06), whereas the decrease from baseline to 48 weeks was statistically significant ( p = 0.02) (Figure S3 ).

The 30-day mortality showed a trend towards significance in patients > 50 years of age compared with those aged ≤ 50 years (35.48% vs. 7.94%, p = 0.06) [Figure 2 ].

A strong trend toward a decrease in accuracy was seen when including only entropy (kurtosis weight 0 and entropy weight 1) (0.676 ± 0.0482, p = 0.06) and weaker trends toward a decrease in accuracy when kurtosis is weighted 5:1 over entropy (0.704 ± 0.103, p = 0.21) or entropy is weighted 5:1 over kurtosis (0.712 ± 0.0676, p = 0.28).