Excerpts

The two-way interaction was highly significant for plant height, tiller number, root length and root density at (p < 0.001).

older) on perceptual ratings revealed a highly significant main effect of age, F(1, 490) = 33.867, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.065.

A multivariate analysis through a linear mixed effects model (see Methods) reveals highly significant ( p − values < 0.001) correlations between FSLE, the QPI and the rate of attempted prey capture (see Table SI1 ).

In contrast to this prediction, ANCOVA (α = 0.05) revealed a highly significant decrease in DSD of neurons from female, compared to male mice (F = 14.838, DF = 1, p < 0.001) in A1, A2, V1, V2 and TeA.

Moderately to highly significant inconsistency (I 2 > 50%, P < 0.001) was found in all proportion analyses (86.4%, 74.9%, 73.8%, and 91.6%, for AIC, LB, ALG, and ALP, respectively).

The chi-square (X 2 ) test showed a highly significant association between MAFLD and steatosis ( p < 0.001).

The significant mean for each slope factor demonstrates that all participants experienced a decline in sleep duration (μ = − 0.236, p < 0.01) and an increasing trend in frailty (μ = 0.514, p < 0.001) over time.

Comparing the two re-normalized fractional contributions for HeLa-wt and HeLa-APL-R cells, we found that the differences in both, α A and α B , determined for HeLa-wt and HeLa-APL-R cells are markedly significant (p < 0.001), with α B ≫ α A in HeLa-wt and α A ≫ α B in HeLa-APL-R cells, suggesting that APL * -B species seem to be critical for the mechanism of action of plitidepsin, while APL * -A species seems to be more related with cell defense against APL entry into cells.

Although these methods had a lot in common in highly significant MTAs, there was a difference between the methods in terms of significant SNPs at the level of − log 10 ( p ) > 3.

P values were set at 0.05 ( p < 0.05) for significant differences (*), 0.01 ( p < 0.01) for highly significant differences (**), and 0.001/0.0001 ( p < 0.001/ p <0.0001) for extremely significant differences (***/****).

The overall significant neuroprotective effect of HT appeared to be due to a highly significant neuroprotective effect in females ( p < 0.001), which compensated for a non-significant effect in males ( p = 0.07; Fig. 5 a).

All the drivers were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Toxicology bioassay Exposure of the mites to honey bee venom resulted in a highly significant increase in the percentage of inactive mites compared to the control (approximately 7% vs 0.9%, respectively; GLMM; χ 2 = 12.191, P < 0.001; Fig. 6 a).

However, the control group reached peak edema in the distal skin tissue layer within 6 h postoperatively, with a highly significant difference compared to the sham group ( P < 0.001).

Furthermore, the interaction effect between depth and surface orientation was highly significant (permutational ANOVA, p < 0.001) throughout most of the study period, indicating that recruitment on a particular surface orientation was affected by depth.

The effect was highly significant at 40 J/cm 2 with a 35% decrease in oxidizing species compared to control (p < 0.001).

Chi-square testing of the association between month and umbilical scar status was highly significant (χ 2 , df = 34, P < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

Genetic subdivision was highly significant between regions ( F CT = 0.882, P < 0.001 for mtCOI; F CT = 0.713, P < 0.001 for nrITS), indicating a high level of geographical population structure.

Molecular mapping of QTLs associated with seed-Fe and Zn concentrations A highly significant difference (P < 0.001) of seed-Fe (51.3 ± 5.0, 40.3–67.0 ppm with 81% H 2 ) and Zn (36.0 ± 3.8, 27.9–48.5 ppm with 83% H 2 ) concentrations in two parental accessions and 277 individuals of a RIL mapping population [ICC 4958 (Fe: 43.0 ± 2.9 and Zn: 30.2 ± 2.5 ppm) × ICC 8261 (Fe: 64.8 ± 3.3 and Zn: 42.0 ± 2.7 ppm)] across two years based on ANOVA was observed ( Table S3 , Fig. 3A,B ).

At 12 h and 15 h, the difference in the number of M5 cells between the wild-type and Δ hylB groups reached a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

Differences are considered statistically significant at a value of p < 0.05 (denoted as *); very significant at a value of p < 0.01(denoted as # ) and extremely significant at a value of p < 0.001 (denoted as ⋆ ).

A GG-corrected RM ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of location on elastin density ( p < 0.001), with notable differences between TA and IFR ( p < 0.001), TA and dAA ( p < 0.001), SC and IFR ( p < 0.001), and SC and dAA ( p < 0.001).

Complete healing of the wounds receiving LLLT in combination with CoQ10 was highly significant on both days 13 and 15 compared with controls or wounds treated with LLLT or CoQ10 alone (p < 0.001), whereas no difference was found in the wounds treated with LLL alone, CoQ10 alone vs. sham treatment.

The first two pathways were highly robust and appeared to be highly significant (p-value < 0.001) at the top of the lists from all three TAN groups.

Direct effects, from prenatal exposure to childhood ARS, were marginally significant at ages 6 (p-value 0.060) and 8 (p-value < 0.001).