The difference between the JNDs in the blur- and luminance-based experiments was highly significant ( t (52) = −8.18, P < 0.001, paired t -test; see Supplementary Fig.
Excerpts
In particular, the examined groups differed in their average walking speed, as revealed by a highly significant main effect of Group [F(2,59) = 61.65, p < 0.001].
Differences between mutants and control are highly significant by ANOVA two-tailed Tukey-Kramer approach for multiple comparisons (***, p<0.001).
We test the significance of this tentatively observed structural change by applying Chow test and find that the observed structural breaks are highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The results from ANOVA showed that the effect of genotype factor on pigment contents was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).
The differences in rates were highly significant between the regions (p<0.001).
As regard nasal obstruction, highly significant difference towards group I with intranasal steroids, when compared with group II with intranasal saline 6 months ( P = .001) and 1 year ( P = .031) postoperatively.
The correlation coefficients with WHiR were markedly lower (<0.5), but still highly significant (p<0.001).
The analysis of isolation-by-distance revealed a high and highly significant positive correlation between geographic and genetic distances ( r = 0.716, p <0.001).
The effect of prune intervention in postmenopausal women was borderline significant at the lumbar spine, with BMD slightly higher in the intervention group (SMD [95% CI] = 1.30 [−0.03, 2.63]; I 2 = 98%; p < 0.001).
The ANOVA results reveal that the tool-axis orientation is the dominant factor affecting the bottom height deviation (Δ h ), with a highly significant p -value ( p = 0.001).
Our methodology generates angle and duration means that are good representation of the mean for the whole dance For both angle and duration, there was a highly significant correlation between our four waggle run sample ( x 1 ) and the mean of all the waggle runs within a dance ( x t ) (Regression analysis: Angle: R 2 = 99.7%, p<0.001; Duration: R 2 = 97.3%, p<0.001; Fig. 5 ).
The mean age of the adolescents with AAI increased significantly over time when performing an overall trend analyses ( p < .001). 3 In 2007, 62,8% of the adolescents were < 16 y.o, whereas by 2019 this had dropped to 40.2%.
A p -value of <0.05 (*) was considered as significant, p -value of <0.01(**) was highly significant and P <0.001 (***) was very highly significant.
The negbin variant of count models was used as the estimated alpha parameters were greater than zero and highly significant (p < 0.001); and, the dependent variables had no zero observations.
All correlations were positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001).
In relation to why previous GWA studies have not previously identified ABCC5 as a T2D susceptibility gene, it is worth noting that while individual nominally significant SNP p-values nearest to the estimated ABCC5 variant location at 185,136 kb for the WTCCC (e.g. rs3749441, P = 1E−03), NIDDK (e.g. rs1016752, P = 0.04) and TwinsUK samples (e.g. rs8180093, P = 0.002) do not pass genome-wide significance ( α = 1E−05), when all the SNPs in the region are considered collectively as part of a multilocus model, they do provide strong evidence of association with T2D and insulin resistance (meta-analysis P = 3E−07).
95 ± 7.43 mg in Group 2) which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) following pre-medication with dexmedetomidine as compared to control group [ Figure 4 ].
The effect size across primary and sensitivity analyses (which were highly significant; p < 0.001) was between − 0.696 and − 0.964, indicating that a minimally detectable effect size was a one-point or less improvement on a 10-item knowledge test.
There was a highly significant difference in BMI between the three communities ( P <0.001, anova ), with post hoc test (Tukey's) indicating that children from the UA community had significantly higher BMI than either UP ( P =0.001) or SR children ( P <0.001) ( Table 1 ).
The overall model was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) and demonstrated a substantial explanatory power, accounting for 38.7% of the total variance in 6‐month weight loss ( R 2 = 0.387).
demonstrated highly significant difference ( P =0.001) between Ki-67 proliferation rates of mesothelial cells from patients with malignant tumors other than mesothelial origin (7.0% to 25.5%) and mesothelial cells of patients without any malignant disease (1.8% to 16.3%).
Mantel tests showed a significant correlation between pairwise F ST and coastal water distance for both datasets, indicating a strong trend of isolation‐by‐distance ( p ‐value = 0.001) (Figure 3 ). 3.3 Connectivity and historical relationships TreeMix produced a population graph that supported a major phylogeographic split between the outer coast of Washington and Puget Sound.
For these studies, results are highly significant ( p <10 −3 ) and a low number of chance associations is expected (estimated number of false discovery observations = 0.08 annotations).
A repeated measures ANOVA including the within-subject factors RESPONSE (errors versus correct hits) and CONDITION (placebo versus control), carried out on the ERN amplitudes averaged across the three frontocentral electrodes (Fz, FCz, and Cz), revealed a highly significant main effect of RESPONSE ( F (1,17) = 25.0, p <0.001), showing, as expected, a larger ERN for errors relative to fast hits.