On studying the effect of age on COVID-19 severity we found a highly significant association of age with COVID-19 severity where, people ≥ 50 years of age were found to be at risk of developing a severe form of COVID-19 ( p < 0.001) as compared to patients ≤ 50 years of age.
Excerpts
Liver enzymes, Mediterranean diet and the metabolic syndrome However, a highly significant interaction was observed between AST/ALT ratio and MedDietScore ( p < 0.001).
It was statistically highly significant (p<0.001) (Figure 4 ).
For each analysis, genome-wide thresholds for suggestive ( P < 0.63), significant ( P < 0.05) and highly significant ( P < 0.001) QTL were determined by 1000 permutations.
Results of the ANCOVA test show that the model and all of its components (continental group, population and physical distance class) are highly significant (p < 0.001).
Mental health showed an increasing trend during the four measurement points (slope = 2.25, p < 0.001).
P value ≤ 0.0001 is considered as extremely significant (****), P ≤ 0.001 as highly significant (***), P ≤ 0.01 as very significant (**), P ≤ 0.05 as significant (*) and P > 0.05 as not significant (NS), respectively.
There was a significant trend for stepwise increases in the counts of WBC (ANOVA p < 0.001) corresponding to the severity of hepatic steatosis in study participants.
For product stimuli, a highly significant effect is observed on emotional response (β = 0.471; p < 0.001), but no effect on perceived uniqueness (β = −0.012; p > 0.05), confirming H6 and rejecting H5.
The Wald test for fixed effects identified that genotypic variation was highly significant (p-value <0.001) for stem color, stem fill, and winter injury, but not for winter standability ( Supplementary Table 2 ).
The cytotoxic assay expressed an extremely significant antitumor effect by β-SIT-Alg/Ch-NPs-FA when compared to β-SIT-suspension ( p < 0.001).
We found 558 contigs with highly significant correlations (p < 0.001); 206 of these were positively correlated, while the remaining 352 were negatively correlated ( Supplementary Table S3 ).
Univariate test results revealed a highly significant and substantial main effect of Group on recognition speed [ F (2, 82) = 22.59, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.355].
In comparison, the majority of the lines expressing ΔN ZmL (2 lines) or any of the chimeric DGAT1s (2–4 lines identified from each construct) had highly significant ( P < 0.001) increases in lipid levels compared to both wild type and their respective null siblings ( Table 2 and Supplementary Tables 4 , 5 ).
However, the average functional correlation between the three datasets is highly significant , P <10 −3 ) for arrays under such apparently diverse conditions.
In Figure 3C (Cardiac rehospitalization), the HR increases for higher IC levels, with a highly significant overall association ( P < 0.001), although the non-linear association is not significant ( P = 0.694).
The correlation between PAL and PPO activities was highly significant ( p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.66) ( Supplementary Material, Table S3 ).
Increase in SWT (R = 0.554) and SR (R = 0.607) showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) increase with TLD but this relation was not apparent with other parameters.
The difference between CRC patients and normal controls was statistically highly significant ( P<0.001 ).
With the covariates excluded from the model, a one-way between-subjects ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect for group ( F (3,110) = 6.4, P < 0.001; ηp 2 = 14.9).
When sampling locations were compared to each other, we found a highly significant difference between the median concentrations (Kruskall-Wallis p < 0.001).
Figure 2 shows that there is a decreasing trend in the proportion of stroke survivors discharged to care homes over time ( P <0.001).
The PR diet produced an even greater and highly significant LeR increase from baseline and compared to the control diet in neuronal‐enriched EVs (interaction of diet type and time point, F(1, 36) = 20.120, P < 0.001; univariate post hoc comparison of the two diets after 1 month, F(1, 43) = 6.41, P = 0.015; univariate post hoc comparison between baseline and 1 month after PR diet, F(1, 35) = 52.772, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2 B).
The heterogeneity in RRs was highly significant and the differences between the countries, as opposed to chance, accounted for an estimated 82% of the variation in the pooled rate (p<0.001, I 2 =82.1% (95% CI 63.8% to 100%)).
To validate this further, we transfected cells with ASO-MALAT1 and miR-30b mimic and observed a highly significant reduction in TLR8 ( P<0.001 ).