A chi-square test indicated a highly significant association between phylogenetic groups and LPS core types [ χ 2(28)=4,338.3, P <0.001).
Excerpts
The correlation between IGF-1 levels and neoplastic growth stimulation was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating that MØCM IGF-1 levels were directly related to the ability of MØCM to stimulate neoplastic proliferation.
The regression coefficient between BMI and caries was highly significant (p < 0.001).
All these correlations were highly significant (p<0.001).
Likewise, the adjusted risk of death without prior ICD therapy was significantly higher in the low-ANSS group, and higher, albeit borderline significant, in the intermediate-ANSS group compared with the high-ANSS group (HR: 2.29; p = 0.001, and HR: 1.58; p = 0.06, respectively) ( Table 3 ). 3.5.
On further analysis, statistically significant correlations were observed among the different periodontal parameters studied with the age and gender of the subjects and the predicted tobacco/nicotine dependence which included potential correlations among age and PPD ( P value = 0.0420), age and CAL ( P value = 0.0040), gender and GI ( P value = 0.0320), gender and OHI-S ( P value = 0.0210), GI and OHI-S ( P value = 0.0240), GI and PPD ( P value = 0.0180), and GI and CAL ( P value = 0.0050), while the results were found to be statistically highly significant in case of the correlations derived between OHI-S and CAL ( P value = 0.0010) and PPD and CAL ( P value = 0.0001) with several clinical implications of interest.
The differences in the IOL/PC distances between the different PCO types are statistically highly significant ( p <0.001).The results in Figure 5 show that the pearl type (p) had the highest median IOL/PC distance, followed by the late-postoperative CBDS (cbds), the mixed (m), the fibrosis type (f), and the control group (cg).
In contrast, obesity (BMI: 27.5-37.5 kg/m 2 ) was even more prevalent among 68 (52%) female cases in comparison to 6 (12%) female controls, and frequency distribution of BMI was highly significant ( p < 0.001) among them.
A paired t-test of mean confidence in test runs and that in intervention runs showed that the drop in confidence was highly significant ( M = −0.16, SE = 0.02, t(31) = −6.67, p < 0.001) in the corrupted feedback session.
The suffering and loss of dignity measures were associated with previously validated measures of psychological distress, physical distress, and overall quality of death, and peacefulness at the end of life, [ 24 – 27 ] with results demonstrated highly significant associations (all p < 0.001).
The majority of correlations between corresponding domains of the IOF QLQ and the SF-36 questionnaires were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and all were strongly negative ( r = −0.52 to r = −0.76) due to the difference in scoring of the two questionnaires.
Patients with sub-massive PE had PESI scores ranging between 81 and 99, while those with low-risk PE had PESI scores ranging between 59 and 69. Correlation between PESI and death was highly significant ( p <0.001).
The level of significance denoted with double asterisks means highly significant P < .001 values. 3.
The difference in concordance between AI systems and experts was highly significant (ΔAC1 + 0.84, 95% CI 0.70–0.90; p < 0.001).
TSP) had a highly significant effect on the isotope signature of AAs extracted (F 13,208 = 376; p < 0.001) with EPS AAs being more enriched in 15 N than those in the total soil (TSP), 0.76% compared to 0.60%, respectively (l.s.d. = 0.02 Atom%).
Interestingly, there were highly significant differences in mean whole blood percent for most of the FAs ( p < 0.001; Table 7 ).
Results MEG Results The repeated measures ANOVA on MMN amplitudes reveals that there is a highly significant difference among the conditions (main effect of condition, F(2,43) = 11.740, p<0.001), with the largest MMN in the control condition and decreasing amplitudes in the four, six and eight tone conditions.
CPP showed weakly significant correlation with SMI ( r = 0.492; p = 0.001), and no significant correlation with CVMI ( r = 0.150; p = 0.105).
However, both direct measurements tested (WP4C and Vapro), identified highly significant differences between cultivars (p ≤ 0.001).
Additionally, there was a positive, strong, and highly significant relationship (r=0.852; p<0.001) between the total scores obtained.
This increased nestin immunoreactivity within APP clones was highly significant and represented a more than 40-fold induction (ANOVA, p < 0.001).
Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) further revealed highly significant differences in community structure among the different zones of the Xiaolangdi Reservoir (R = 0.7466, p < 0.001; Figure S4A ).
This was evident as all pairwise comparisons between profiles for each of the eight VAX factors demonstrated a highly significant level of p < 0.001.
Non-parametric tests revealed highly significant differentiation between ERVs from African versus Eurasian species ( P < 0.001).
There were extremely significant differences (approximately 3-fold) in carcass fat content ( p < 0.001) but no significant difference in body weight between the two groups ( p > 0.05). 2.2.