Excerpts

Concurrent validity based on functional impairment according to the GAF scale showed a highly significant negative correlation (r = −0.771; p < 0.001).

A regression of conductivity to TDS was highly significant ( p < 0.001 and r 2 = 0.918) and proved useful for estimating TDS from the more easily measured conductivity parameter when TDS was not individually measured (Figure 3 ).

Specifically, WISP2 showed highly significant expression differences ( p value < 0.001), while MELK and SDF2L1 showed substantial statistical significance ( p value < 0.01).

There was a highly significant difference in periodical medical check-ups between CFHs and HCFHs ( p < 0.001).

Differences were considered significant at the level ( P < 0.05) and highly significant at the level ( P < 0.001) 25 .

A significant trend of mean BUA value with aging was observed in males (p = 0.001) and females (p < 0.001) of community population.

Using these cut-off values and all available data, there was highly significant concordance (p<0.001) between the three methods as shown in Table 2 .

Once the two subgroups in TPV were formed, the relationship between TPV and GVPZ was found to be highly significant (p<0.001).

Statistical significance was determined by p value < 0.05 (borderline significant), p < 0.01 (moderately significant) and p < 0.001 (strongly significant).

The correlation analysis of the eosinophilic biomarkers [ Table 6 ] showed that FeNO had a moderately significant correlation with sputum eosinophil (r = 0.45, P < 0.001) and peripheral eosinophil levels (r = 0.51, P < 0.001).

This dominant partitioning of genetic diversity by regions was supported by high and highly significant (P < 0.001) values for pairwise population differentiation (F ST ) between populations from both regions: PA:FI F ST = 0.95; AO:FI, F ST = 0.97).

A two-way MANOVA on log 10 -transformed R, G and B luminances of the 6 colour characters indicated that habitat, locality and habitat-locality interaction were all highly significant (habitat, Pillai’s Trace = 0.450, F 6,201 = 27.44, P < 0.001; locality, Pillai’s trace = 0.479, F 18,609 = 6.43, P < 0.001; interaction, Pillai’s trace =0.285, F 18,609 = 3.55, P < 0.001).

Interestingly, the roughly 3-fold decrease in the rate of intubation seen in nosocomial cases (5.2%) compared to community cases (13.9%) remained highly significant even after correcting for patient age and length of stay (ß = -1.49; SE = 0.44; p < 0.001).

The difference was considered nonsignificant if P > 0.05, significant if P < 0.05, and highly significant if P < 0.001.

A significant trend was found for changes between groups for t PTEF / t E ( Figure 3 ), which decreased with disease severity (p<0.001, Table 3 ).

Both the Begg and Mazumbar’s test and the Egger’s test resulted in highly significant indicators of publication bias ( P < 0.001).

All the ANOVA comparisons performed and the Mantel tests were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 5 ), and showed that the provenance geographic location explained between 55% and 74% of the beta-diversity difference for the lab samples, proving that the population-specific bacterial fingerprints were maintained ( Table 5 ).

Even though the number of F-plasmid encoded genes is small, this difference is statistically highly significant (p < 0.001, Fisher's exact test), implying large differences between F-plasmid encoded and chromosomal genes.

As seen in Fig 6 , the PMd/M1 data contained robust rotational structure explaining 56% of the variance in the first two planes (40% in the first plane), an RGR of 0.77 over all jPCA planes, a circularity of 0.63, and the rotational structure was highly significant ( p < 0.001, CMPT with 1000 repetitions).

A hierarchical partitioning of variance shows that by far, most of the variance (90.4%, Table 4 ) can be accounted for by differences among the groups, which is highly significant (p<0.001) and supports the four-group classification [38] .

Likewise, the adjusted risk of death without prior ICD therapy was significantly higher in the low-ANSS group, and higher, albeit borderline significant, in the intermediate-ANSS group compared with the high-ANSS group (HR: 2.29; p = 0.001, and HR: 1.58; p = 0.06, respectively) ( Table 3 ). 3.5.

Genes associated with 706 moderately significant SNPs with a frequentist additive p-value of <0.001, good clustering and intact NCBI build 36 reference ids were taken from WTCCC T2D data [ 8 ].

No significant difference was observed between the frequency of inheritance of alleles PpAnnD3- 2 and PpAnnD3- 3 (χ 2 p > 0.1); however, a highly significant bias against the inheritance of allele PpAnnD3- 4 was apparent (χ 2 p < 0.001).

In addition, the MCM2 expression level increased with increasing grade of dysplasia, with a highly significant difference between the mild and moderate epithelial dysplasia ( p < 0.001), between the mild and severe epithelial dysplasia ( p = 0.000), and between the moderate and severe epithelial dysplasia ( p < 0.001).

The results revealed a more highly significant correlation between spleen volume and spleen length (r 2 =0.633, P<0.001) in comparison to spleen thickness (r 2 =0.5664, P<0.001) and spleen width (r 2 =0.572, P<0.001) ( Fig. 3 , Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 ).