Excerpts

The variable was highly significant (Anova, analysis of deviance: df = 16, P < 0.001), and a dispersion factor of 1.004 indicated a good model fit.

By POD70, cochlear ablation resulted in a highly significant (ANOVA, p<0.001) areal reduction of 0.66 on the affected side, or a shrinkage by 34%.

The Bayesian LMM analysis found that the main effects of condition ( F = 12.2, p < 0.001) and frequency ( F = 173, p < 0.001) were statistically significant; the interaction between Condition and frequency was also highly significant ( F = 114, p < 0.001), showing that log-PSD was higher during the poststimulus phase only at the 4-Hz frequency, and that at 8 Hz the order was flipped with higher log-PSD observed during the Baseline period.

The results were highly significant with P < 0.001.[ 6 ] In accordance to Dr.

Compared to the neurorrhaphy procedure using fibrin glue, VIVO with a △L/L 0 of 6.96 ± 1.58 [%] showed a highly significant higher elongation at the maximum load ( p < 0.001).

An extremely significant increase (P < 0.001) in the C max (maximum plasma concentration), T max (time to reach C max ), t 1/2 (half-life), and AUC 0-t and AUC 0-∞ (area under the curve) of RC was noticed in the group that concurrently received guggulipid extract compared to the group that received RC treatment alone ( Table 1 ). 3.3.

Differences were considered to be significant if P <.05 and highly significant if P <.001.

There was a strong and highly significant negative relationship (p<0.001) between their occupational professionalism and their tendency to medical error.

While the 61% increase (from 12.8 to 20.5 cells/mm 2 , p < 0.001) in the number of proliferating cells upon SD-208 treatment in the central region did not reach statistical significance, SD-208 treatment significantly increased the number of proliferating cells by 121% (from 24.7 to 55.2 cells/mm 2 , p < 0.001) in the periphery of the tumour (Figure 6 C).

The model was highly significant by CV-ANOVA ( p <0.001), and hence, clear group separation was achieved ( Figure 1 ).

This almost 2.5-fold increase in the proportion of patients with LA who had periodontitis compared with control subjects was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 1 ).

These improvements were highly significant in each of the domains tested ( p < 0.001).

On average, gene diversity was high across sites and across markers [ H E = 0.79 ± 0.07 (min–max: 0.57–0.89)] and F IS values were low [ F IS = 0.10 ± 0.06 (0–0.21)], although there was a highly significant species-wide heterozygote deficit compared to Hardy–Weinberg expectations ( P < 0.001).

Interaction between treatments and sub-nuclei was also highly significant (F (2,14) = 73.10; p < 0.001).

Additionally, this difference increased further after 72 h (14.2-fold decrease of ME-Transformed IC50 value compared to the negative controls), and was highly significant ( p value < 0.001 at 48 h and <0.0001 at 72 h).

The levels of significance, relative arbitrary intensity and median log2 fold change of all highly significant ( p < 0.001, q < 0.001) m / z peaks contributing to class separation for OC/Normal and OC/BOT are shown in supplementary tables 6 and 7 .

Importantly, there were a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in ciliostasis scores between the vaccinated-challenged groups and the blank control group ( Fig. 6 A).

None of these controls enabled replication, a result that was highly significant ( p < 0.001, one-sided Fisher’s exact test), suggesting that OriGen learned to preserve essential functional elements even in a replication system highly sensitive to mutations.

Ear × Lead Interval effect was also significant, F (4,212) = 3.76, p = .026, Greenhouse-Geisser corrected p = .028 (Table 3 ), which upon further analysis indicated a highly significant effect of lead interval (direction as described above) in monaural left ear PPI trials, F (1,54) = 12.54, p = .001, Greenhouse-Geisser corrected p = .001 (mean latency ± 1 SEM , 60-ms left ear PPI: 35.05 ± 0.65 ms; 120-ms PPI: 37.60 ± 0.57 ms); a trend for this effect in right ear PPI trials, F (1,54) = 3.05, p = .086, Greenhouse-Geisser corrected p = .086.

This overlap is highly significant compared to random redistributions of CNVs in the genome ( P < 0.001).

In a further step, correlations of the eight strategies were also analyzed, revealing only highly significant and mostly high correlations between the strategies, the lowest correlation was r = .449, p < .001 for situation selection and behavioral display.

Volunteers who chewed “honey leather” showed there were statistically highly significant reductions in mean plaque scores (0.99 reduced to 0.65; p=0.001) in the manuka honey group compared to the control group suggesting a potential therapeutic role of honey for gingivitis, periodontal disease (English et al., 2004), mouth ulcers, and other problems of oral health (Molan, 2001b).

Although log (UAGT/UCre) levels in pregnant women with preeclampsia were slightly less than in pregnant women without preeclampsia, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Log (UAGT/UCre) levels were correlated positively with proteinuria in pregnant women with preeclampsia (r=0.42, p=0.001).

From the 10th day forward, the group that applied with 10% (w/w) crude extract ointment displayed wound contraction, which was highly significant (P < 0.001) compared to the negative control group (simple ointment).

Figure S1 shows the successful posterior predictive checks: the simulated data from the hybrid model reproduce the key features of our data indicated by the highly significant correlation between the real and simulated choice behavior (all r s ≥ 0.83 and p < 0.001).