Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,635 sentences

highly significantP<2.2×10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Kruskal-Wallis tests revealed a highly significant increase in CNVs in these epithelial tissues compared with the B cells (P<2.2×10 −16 ), indicating that they could be considered tumor cells.
highly significantp value <2.2E16the decimal point is missing; read as 2.2e-16qualifiedgold
Interestingly, we have observed a much higher number of negatively correlated mRNAs than positively correlated ones with the medians of 430 and 1,022 for the positively and negatively co-expressed transcripts respectively, and the trend towards negative correlation was highly significant ( p value <2.2E16, Wilcoxon signed rank test) (Fig. 2 e, Additional file 1 : Supplemental Table S4).
highly significantp < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The test revealed a highly significant enrichment of immune-related genes among the predicted candidates (p < 2.2e-16), with an estimated odds ratio of 48.6 (95% confidence interval: 31.6–78.3), indicating that immune genes were substantially overrepresented in the iM candidate list compared to housekeeping genes. 3.2 Validation of candidates To evaluate the iM-candidates, data from the GSE227616 dataset were compared with the identified candidates.
highly significantP < 2.2x10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
DNA methylation at 84.7% of these sites was significantly associated with at least one common genetic variant using a stringent mQTL threshold (P < 1x10 -8 ) ( S2 Table ); this represented a highly significant enrichment for mQTL effects (P < 2.2x10 -16 ) compared to less-heritable DNA methylation sites (defined as those with A < 0.8), amongst which only 24.5% were associated with a mQTL variant.
highly significantP <2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Visually, H3K4me2 also seemed to be lost at this region, but the major site of enrichment, at the spacer promoter, was unaffected, and the locus-wide correlation remained robust and highly significant (mESC vs. mNPC: R 2 = 0.87, P <2.2 × 10 −16 ).
highly significantP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A Wilcoxon rank sum test indicated a highly significant difference in fitness variation ( W = 3.2 × 10 8 and P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), supported by Welch’s t test, which showed a lower mean absolute fitness difference for closely related homologs compared to distantly related homologs ( t = −63.5, df = 7,020, and P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ; table S9).
highly significantp < 2.2×10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Supporting this hypothesis, a comparison of the mean coverage of the nuwt regions to that of the non-nuwt regions showed a small but highly significant difference between them (Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction, p < 2.2×10 -16 for all 13 samples).