Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp<2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Lastly, we compared the average TE ages between SUO and SLO genes in human and revealed a highly significant difference (p<2.2e-16, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test), with the former at 16.1% and the latter at 21.3% sequence divergence from their consensus sequences (For reference, 16–18% of unconstrained nucleotides have been substituted since the split of primates from other mammalian orders [32] ).
highly significantP<2.2×10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Kruskal-Wallis tests revealed a highly significant increase in CNVs in these epithelial tissues compared with the B cells (P<2.2×10 −16 ), indicating that they could be considered tumor cells.
highly significantP = 2.2E-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
DNMT1-Dependent DNA Methylation in Adult Interneurons Affects Degradative Pathways In stark contrast to the comparison of the 18 months old genotypes, we determined a highly significant overlap ( P = 2.2E-16, Fisher’s Exact test for gene set enrichment analysis; odds ratio = 0.434) of 645 genes between young control and Dnmt1 knockout interneurons, which display significant differences in both DNA methylation and gene expression ( Pensold et al., 2020 ).
highly significantp = 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Finally, we observed a highly significant increase (one-sided Student’s t -test, p = 2.2 × 10 −16 ) in average epistasis values in the winning CR genotypes compared with the overall population, indicating that positive epistasis plays an important role in determining the fittest genotypes in this selection (Fig. 5b ).
highly significantp = 2.2e‐160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When examining 92 age‐associated metabolites, the correlation between the age beta coefficient was highly significant ( r = 0.79, p = 2.2e‐16; Figure S2B ), suggesting the reliability of our method. 91 of them changed with age in the same direction, among which 27 were statistically significant.
highly significantp < 2.2 x 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The two-factor Anova analyses using genomic distance types (intra- vs inter-zone configuration) and geographic zones as explicative variables of genomic distance were highly significant (p < 2.2 x 10 −16 ) for all comparisons, except for the general distances distribution between continental and islands species (2 Zones– Fig 3 ; 4 Zones– S3 Fig ; 6 Zones– S4 Fig ).
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This revealed a highly significant association between gene age and expression specificity in both species ( D. melanogaster : χ 2 = 1092.66, df = 5, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ; A. aegypti : χ 2 = 890.74, df = 5, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), indicating that stage‐specific genes are significantly enriched for evolutionarily young genes. 2.4.
highly significantp -value < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All correlations were highly significant ( p -value < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), implying that site-specific PTM changes are consistently associated with deviations in protein abundance that cannot be explained by RNA-level changes alone ( Figure 7 b).
a clear trendP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphagold
Although circRNA expression shows a clear trend for both positive (β = 1.121, P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) and negative (β = −1.015, P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) β values (effect size), there is no such trend in the mRNA expression (β = 0.0294, P = 0.8654; and β = −0.0339, P = 0.8639 for positive and negative β values, respectively).
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This correlation was highly significant ( p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), indicating that the observed similarity is unlikely to occur by chance. 2.4 Expression of PAMPs and DAMPs in Human and Murine pDCs Quantitative proteomic comparison of human and murine plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) revealed selective, pathway‐specific differences rather than global proteome shifts.
highly significantP -value < 2.2e–160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Notably, while the in vitro and the denatured control samples slightly but significantly anticorrelated (average PCC = −0.07, Edgington-combined FDR-adjusted P -value = 3.3e–6), a moderate yet highly significant correlation was instead detected between the in vivo and the denatured control samples (average PCC = 0.18, Edgington-combined FDR-adjusted P -value < 2.2e–16).
highly significantP value < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient of nucleotide diversity by gene between species was positive and highly significant for both diversity measures ( π : ρ = 0.36, P value < 2.2e-16; θ W : ρ = 0.38, P value < 2.2e-16) for a subset of 6,798 genes with these statistics available in both species ( supplementary fig.
highly significantP < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For all three species comparisons, a linear regression of %ID and log 2 hybridization ratio showed a strong and highly significant correlation ( D. sechellia : Multiple R 2 = 0.3257, P < 2.2e-16; D. simulans : Multiple R 2 = 0.2920, P < 2.2e-16; D. yakuba : Multiple R 2 = 0.4083, P < 2.2e-16) (Figure 2 ), with the data for D. yakuba showing the strongest correlation.