The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test revealed highly significant intergroup differences ( p < 0.001) in the distributions of TRIM5 , TRIM11 , TRIM21 , and TRIM72 .
Excerpts
Although no significant difference of CCD counts between the acupuncture and control groups was found ( P = 0.325), a highly significant positive effect of acupuncture was detected in center B ( P < 0.001).
The comparisons between the clinical model and the cli-radiology model, the clinical model and the cli-pathology model, and the cli-radiology model and the combined model all demonstrated highly significant differences (all p < 0.001).
The results for a positive response on the treatment benefit scale of “greatly improved” or “improved” were also highly significant, in that 62.8% of patients receiving onabotulinumtoxinA reported a positive response in comparison to 26.8% of patients receiving placebo ( P <0.001).
The risk of cancer decreased with a start as a male seafarer after 1985, with a significant trend for total cancer ( P < 0.001), lung cancer ( P = 0.001) and, for tanker seafarers, leukaemia ( P = 0.045).
The mean reduction of 4.60 ± 1.39 in the intervention group was highly significant relative to placebo (0.73 ± 1.38; p < 0.001).
The obtained KMO value (0.621) indicated an acceptable sampling adequacy, while Bartlett’s test was highly significant (χ 2 = 126.05, p < 0.001), confirming that the correlation matrix was appropriate for multivariate analysis.
Within both the single-detection and co-detection groups, all inflammatory markers showed highly significant differences between pre- and post-treatment values (all P<0.001), with consistent core trends: CRP, NLR, PLR, IBI and PWR were significantly reduced after treatment, whereas PLT was increased.
A highly significant main effect of task [ F (2,108) = 29.119, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.350] suggested that the retrieval of dissimilar pairs was more demanding than the retrieval of similar pairs and the DMS-task ( p < 0.001 for both pairwise comparisons, respectively).
This difference was highly significant (OR = 17.8, 95% CI = 3.8–82.8, P < 0.001).
In contrast, a highly significant (P < 0.001) approximately threefold difference was found in the percentage of total cytokine-secreting Ad5-specific CD8 T cells stimulated with Ad5 IC–treated DCs compared with Ad5 vector–treated DCs ( Fig. 4 a ).
The optimal SARIMA model describing the monthly time series also supported a significant 12-month seasonal pattern: the seasonal autoregressive term (estimate ± SE = − 0.37 ± 0.10) was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The analysis generated four discriminant functions which revealed a highly significant difference between call types (Wilks' λ DF1/4 = 0.002, χ 2 = 2446.73, p<0.001; Wilks' λ DF2/4 = 0.088, χ 2 = 934.53, p<0.001; Wilks' DFλ 3/4 = 0.519, χ 2 = 252.48, p<0.001; Wilks' λ DF4 = 0.985, χ 2 = 5.93, p<0.05).
In this group, repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant and robust main effect of time on the outcome measure (F (3, 15) = 198.98, p < 0.001), with a very large effect size (partial η 2 = 0.975).
The results demonstrated a highly significant reduction (P < 0.001) in total purine content after soaking, with a nearly 50 % decrease observed.
18 – 20 Adopting this cost, we calculated a median total cost per patient of 10 731 USD in the early mortality group and 49 056 USD in the late mortality group, with a difference that was highly significant statistically ( P <.001).
Within-group improvements were highly significant in both groups (Group A, nab-paclitaxel: baseline vs 6 m p = 0.001, baseline vs 12 m p = 0.001, 6 m vs 12 m p = 0.001; Group B, sb-paclitaxel: baseline vs 6 m p = 0.001, baseline vs 12 m p = 0.001, 6 m vs 12 m p = 0.01).
The depth of penetration with this system was highly significant ( P < 0.001) than Group A and B which were sealer alone and significant ( P < 0.01) than the PUI in the apical sections and middle sections and coronal sections, respectively [ Tables 1 - 3 ].
Statistical significance levels were defined as follows: p > 0.05 (ns; not significant), p < 0.05 ( significant), p < 0.01 ( highly significant), and p < 0.001 ( extremely significant). 3.
The difference was highly significant (X2 = 11.64, p < .001).
The area exhibits a highly significant positive correlation (p < 0.001) of 0.98 with length, while its correlation with perimeter and width is also highly significant at the 0.001 level, measuring 0.99 and 0.97, respectively.
Occupation, education, age, residence, and monthly expenditure all showed highly significant associations with KAP ( p < 0.001), with occupation (χ2=383.314) and education (χ2=363.490) emerging as the most influential factors (Table 3 ).
This association was highly significant (p < 0.001).
Pairwise permutation tests confirmed that the difference in reproductive skew between Sparouine and each of the other sites was highly significant ( p < 0.001), while pairwise comparisons between Regina, Paracou, and Nouragues were not significant.
Although ADAS‐Cog scores in the metformin group improved from 16.9 ± 6.1 at baseline to 11.9 ± 3.7 at the 1‐year endpoint ( p < 0.001), the difference between the two treatment arms was highly significant ( p < 0.001), as no comparable benefit was observed in the acarbose–donepezil group (17.0 ± 5.9 to 15.9 ± 3.9, p = 0.295). 15 Daphnetin is a natural coumarin derivative with multiple pharmacological activities, including antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and anti‐apoptotic effects. 16 It provides “triple protection” for the blood, vascular endothelium, and ischemic tissues by inhibiting inflammation, anticoagulation, and thrombosis; preserving endothelial integrity; and regulating vasoactive substances.