Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The differences in terms of accuracies between BLUEs and BLUPs were high, despite the highly significant ( p < 0.001) correlations between BLUEs and BLUPs for each trait ranging from 0.93 for FAW to close to 1 for AP, AK, and GWL (presented in Figure 1 ); therefore, only results for BLUPs will be presented hereafter. 3.2.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
One-Way ANOVA of the five taxa showed highly significant differences in sporocyst length ( F = 27.347, P < 0.001, d. f. = 103, Power of performed test with alpha = 0.05: 1.0), whereby pairwise comparisons against Sarcocystis sp.1 were all significant at P < 0.05.
highly significantp ‐values <10 −30.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Data harmonization Before data harmonization, ANCOVA results showed highly significant differences in MRI‐derived volumes among different INNI centers ( p ‐values <10 −3 for all structures except for NT2LV in the training/validation set and p ‐values <10 −2 for all structures except for NT2LV and NCaudmV in the test set).