Excerpts

KMO recorded a value of 0.816, with Bartlett's test highly significant (χ 2 (276) = 3005.444, p<0.001).

When independent sample t-test was applied to compare serum total T4 levels of Neonatal Study Group with TSH levels of Neonatal Control Group (tT4 vs tT4), SEM for Neonatal Study Group was 0.883 and SEM for Neonatal Control Group was 0.652, the results shown were highly significant statistically (P < 0.001) ( Table-II ).

The results were considered significant at * p < 0.05, very significant at ** p < 0.01, or highly significant at *** p < 0.001.

Highly significant input variables ( p < .001) for estimating fine root biomass were mean annual precipitation, sampling depth and the dummy variables for dominant tree species type and species mixing.

To quantitatively test whether these spatial‐ and load‐induced variations in ECM nanostructure are significant, generalized additive models (GAMs) were also used to model the variation, and the results showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences with both anatomical location and loading state (Table S2 , Supporting Information).

Baseline TIMI flow did not significantly differ between the cases and control patients; there was a highly significant reduction in final TIMI flow and myocardial blush grade (p<0.001).

In Tanzania AMA-1 titres showed highly significant correlation between the two fluids and with both oral fluid devices (r2Oracol-fingerprick = 0.89, r2Orasure-Fingerprick = 0.93, both p < 0.001, figure 1a & 1b , Table 1 ).

First, the heterogeneity was moderately significant in the pooled HRs of OS (I 2 = 75.7%, P < 0.001).

A highly significant correlation ( p ≤ 0.001) was found between the type of delivery and the level of neonatal distress at both evaluated time points, with neonates from therapeutic cesarean section experiencing higher distress levels.

By day 28, the VSC level in the placebo group remained at 858.33 ± 150.78 ppb, whereas that in the treatment group dropped further to 533.33 ± 89.09 ppb, with a highly significant difference between the groups ( p < 0.001), reflecting a 37.8% decrease in the treatment group compared to the placebo.

Body Mass Index The mean (SD) BMI was 16.05 (3.3) kg/m 2 (Table 1 ), with a minimum of 8.3 kg/m 2 and a maximum of 76.9 kg/m 2 , showing a significant trend with the lowest value in the public schools (with the lowest socioeconomic status [SES]) and the highest value in the private schools (with the highest SES) (p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

Analysis of variance The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a highly significant differentiation (P< 0.001) among the three sources of variation: genotype (G), environment (E), and the genotype-environment (G x E) interaction, across all agronomic traits ( Table 1 ).

In the 100-item versions, highly significant inversion effects were evident on both our new tasks: Emotion-matching (upright: M = 77.59, SD = 7.64; inverted: M = 68.28, SD = 6.88; t (96) = 4.75, p <.001) and Emotion-labelling (upright: M = 83.10, SD = 6.87; inverted: M = 67.50, SD = 9.84; t (96) = 7.99, p <.001).

There is a highly significant correlation between the total average scores of trainees and trainers for the interview domains displayed in Figure 2 (Pearson’s R = 0.968, p< 0.001).

A similar pattern of results was found for the measure of avoidance latency, with a highly significant two-way interaction, F (12,164) = 3.0, p = .001, reflecting poorer acquisition curves in the 50 and 100 Hz groups relative to the 20 Hz and no stimulation groups ( Figure 2 , middle panel).

The genotypic variation was highly significant (P<0.001) at two severe stressed (Beg-WL and Hyd-DT) and two moderate stress sites (Hyd-WL and Nht-DT).

The data were analyzed using student's T test as well as by Mann-Whitney U test, both of which yielded equivalent results, determining that the differences in time to tumor formation between Kem I and Oku or Sal were highly significant (p<0.001).

Indeed, additional analyses revealed that although there was no difference between Lithuanian and Scottish participants’ homophobia levels when perceived importance of family values was low (simple slope = −.01, SE = .18, t = −.07, p = .95), this difference was highly significant when perceived importance of family values was high (simple slope = −1.03, SE = .17, t = −5.87, p < .001).

To summarize these results in a single conditional logit model, we added all highly significant (i.e. p<0.001) interactions to a backward-stepwise method of estimating the conditional logit model (Model 2).

Although this average for 44 countries (2009–2019) was only moderately above that of the HDI for all 189 countries in both 2009 (mean 0.677 ± 0.157) and 2017 (mean 0.709 ± 0.152), the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test).

Similarly, in the number of users of the telecare service, there are highly significant differences between León, Salamanca and Valladolid and Soria, Ávila, Segovia, Palencia, and Zamora ( p < 0.001 for the first three and p < 0.01 for the last two).

There was a statistically significant difference between cases and controls in BMI that was higher in controls ( p < 0.05) and a highly significant difference in height that was more in controls by mean of 167.7 ± 6.5 cm than in cases by mean of 159.02 ± 8.6.7 cm ( p < 0.001), and this is similar to studies of Abd Elsamei et al.

A highly significant difference ( P <0.001) was observed between the Gold alloy and the two other groups.

This moderation effect was observed in women (£52–100 k per year: β = 0.086, 95%CI [0.073 to 0.100]; <£18 k: β = 0.111, 95%CI [0.098 to 0.123], p = 0.002) and not men (β = 0.054, 95%CI [0.044 to 0.064] vs β = 0.059, 95%CI [0.047 to 0.070], p = 0.006), although the sex difference failed to reach statistical significance in a three-way interaction term corrected for multiple testing (p = 0.001).

Additionally, counts of trapped hornets peaked in early-August, and exhibited a decreasing trend thereafter (GLMM, effect of date: F 1,19 = 495.081, P < 0.001; Fig. 2b ).