Differences between study arms were highly significant (Log-Rank p < 0,001) and the hazard of failure estimated by Cox regression was 20 times higher with CQ compared to SP-AS (HR = 20.7, 95% CI: 7.5; 57.5) (p < 0.001).
Excerpts
Pearson correlation tests showed that there was a close and highly significant relationship between hippocampal SUVr and escape latency ( r = −0.78, p = 0.001) and percentage of path in the target area ( r = 0.81, p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 ), suggesting a notable correlation between changes in hippocampal glucose and changes in Alzheimer’s cognition after the onset of symptoms.
The difference between mdx and WT was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
2.6.2 (R Development Core Team 2008), and the effect of repeat number was highly significant (estimate of correlation coefficient for repeat number = 0.237 and P < 0.001).
We also detected an increasing trend in younger whites, where the proportion of IDU-IE increased from 57.0% in 2000 to 80.3% in 2013 ( P < .001) (Figure 1 D).
* P < 0.05 statistically significant; ** P < 0.01 highly significant; and *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 extremely significant.
Figure 2 displays the Kaplan-Meier curves of cumulative incidence of diabetes according to quintiles of the ALT/HDL-C ratio, showing an increasing trend in cumulative incidence of diabetes with increasing quintiles of the ALT/HDL-C ratio (log-rank P < 0.001).
In contrast, gH625-tagged amygdalin-loaded phase-convertible nanodroplets (MDP) exhibited a highly significant reduction in cell viability across all tested concentrations ( p ≤ 0.001).
Waist-to-height ratio demonstrated the steepest gradient, ranging from 0.41 ± 0.04 in the underweight category to 0.60 ± 0.06 in the obese category, again with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
A 2 × 2 × 2 repeated measures ANOVA with Time (pre/post‐treatment) and Trial‐Type (repeat/switch) as within‐subjects variables, Group (verum/placebo) as between‐subjects variable and mean RT as the dependent variable yielded highly significant effect of Time, F (1,57) = 39.05, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.41, reflecting practice effects and Trial‐Type, F (1,57) = 92.55, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.62, reflecting increased RT for task switch trials.
The ANOVA results indicated a highly significant effect of fortification percentage on all techno-functional properties ( P < 0.001).
However, on the larger external Kaggle dataset ( n = 693), the differences between the ResNet + DenseNet ensemble and the individual models were highly significant: compared to ResNet50V2 ( Z = 4.816, p < 0.001) and InceptionV3 ( Z = 8.042, p < 0.001).
A highly significant inverse relationship between MSI and p53 status was observed (p = 0.001).
When controlled for P3 amplitude, the relationship between prediction error and learning rate remained highly significant (path c’ , p < .001), implying a partial rather than a full mediation.
The increase was highly significant between controls/low levels and high levels of LDR radiation groups ( Table 3 , p < 0.001).
Differences were considered non-significant (ns) when p > 0.05, significant (*) when p < 0.05, very significant (**) when p < 0.01, and highly significant (***) when p < 0.001.
The difference in allele count for Paozhugu between 2014 and 1980 was highly significant ( P = 0.001). 6 paris of landraces (Laogenghongjiao, Lengshuigu, Jiuyuenuo, Xiaowuzui, Dibaigu, Bendidanuo), the number of alleles was significantly higher in the 2014 populations than in the 1980 populations. 13 pairs of landraces under on-farm conservation had higher Ne than those under ex-situ conservation, accounting for 54 % of the landraces.
The change in the difference between the inside and outside logger was highly significant ( F 2,49 = 10.75, P < 0.001) as evaluated using a general linear mixed model with a first-order autoregressive covariance structure to accommodate the covariance of measures taken at successive time intervals on the same trap.
The difference in mortality between VRE patients (18.9%) and non-VRE patients (6.4%) is statistically highly significant (RR 2.97, 95% CI 2.06, 4.29, p < 0.001). 3.10 Admission to intensive care unit A total of 27,839 patients were associated with Enterococcus spp.
Even at this lowest dose there was a highly significant delay in the average onset of emesis (P<0.001), with 2 of the 4 ferrets being completely protected.
This difference was highly significant (t = -25.2; P < 0.001).
The highly significant results ( p < 0.001) for the baseline, +T1, and +T2 confirm that the superior performance of +T1+T2 over these models is not due to random chance.
The linear regression analysis between the total amount of bacteria and changes in weight proved highly significant (p<0.001, R 2 = 0.39) and with a correlation coefficient of -0.62.
This difference was highly significant ( t = −4.055, p < 0.001) and indicates that the effectiveness text module served the intended function. 3.3.
After adjustments, mean BMI for current international migrants was 23.3 kg/m 2 (95% CI 23.0–23.6), with highly significant differences from non-migrants (mean 20.9 kg/m 2 , 95% CI 20.7–21.0, difference = 2.4 kg/m 2 , p < 0.001) and internal migrants (mean 22.0 kg/m 2 , 95% CI 21.7–22.2, difference = 1.3 kg/m 2 , p < 0.001).