Excerpts

We observed highly significant positive correlation between LAS and GLS ( R = 0.804, P < 0.001), moderate positive correlation between LAS and GCS ( R = 0.760, P < 0.001), and moderate negative correlation between LAS and GRS ( R = −0.757, P < 0.001).

The degree of basal cell degeneration observed in OLP cases and the density of chronic inflammatory cell infiltration was compared with the concentration of CD1a-positive LCs in OLP using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and found to be highly significant at P =0.001 and 0.002, respectively [ Figure 6 ].

In this sense, differences were considered as non-significant (NS) when p > 0.05, significant (*) when p < 0.05, very significant (**) when p < 0.01, and highly significant (***) when p < 0.001.

The negative buffering effect of diversity on variability across the gradient was similar in microorganisms and macroorganisms (similar slopes, ANCOVA interaction: P = 0.71), and a single linear fit across both microorganisms and macroorganisms was highly significant (CV = 156–71.1 logS, R 2 = 0.58, P < 0.001; Supplementary Information: Fig.

Positive Cyclin D1 was highly significant with PC (P value < 0.001) (Fig. 1 ).

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences (p < 0.001) between raw and boiled water samples, confirming the effect of repeated boiling.

The correlation analysis showed a positive, very strong, and extremely significant relationship (p<0.001) between the total scores and all subscale scores of PMOI and TMENS ( Table 3 ).

The cohesin complex genes RAD21 ( p = 0.052), SMC1A (0.093), and SMC3 (0.053) showed a trend toward improved EFS, and when all cohesin genes ( RAD21 , SMC1A , SMC3 , STAG2 ) were grouped the effect was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

(2) Highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences were found in this study for cfxA and tet (Q) prevalence by variance analysis between B. fragilis and NBFB species (Table S2).

For parietal electrodes, the main effect of repetition was highly significant [ F (1,12) = 21.9 p < 0.001], with a marginal effect of expectation [ F (1,12) = 3.8, p < 0.08], but the interaction remained non-significant ( p = 0.96).

Finally, we filtered out the SNPs with excess heterozygosity and that showed highly significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium ( P < 0.001) by the filter expression "ExcHet < 0.05 and HWE < 0.001, respectively" using BCFtools [ 32 ].

Statistically, feed rate had a highly significant effect on depth (ANOVA p < 0.001), and post hoc comparisons indicated that all pairwise differences between the three feed levels were significant (e.g., 1000 vs. 2000 mm/min, 1000 vs. 3000 mm/min, etc., each yielding depth differences on the order of several millimetres).

Region effect on the risk of death was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a factor of 3.25 per week.

Vote was highly significant and had a large effect on perceived trustworthiness, F (2, 203) = 113.045, p < 0.001, ηρ 2 = 0.527.

By day 15, however, all photosynthetic pigments except carotenoids demonstrated significant responses to water table manipulation ( P < 0.05) and highly significant temperature dependence ( P < 0.001), with a statistically significant interactive effect between these factors (Table 1 ).

The advantage of the mRNA-1273 vaccine over each of the other 2 vaccines was highly significant ( P < .001) based on the adjusted log-rank test.

4.5.3 Spatial clustering of the vulnerability of grid cells across the protected area Spatial autocorrelation analysis (Global Moran's I) of grid-cell vulnerability index values showed highly significant (z-score >19.62, p < 0.001) positive spatial correlations (I = 0.68) across the HFPA, meaning that neighboring grid cells exhibit similar vulnerability index values more often than expected by chance.

The severity classification of COVID compared with age is depicted in Table 2 which was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The change between the time points is highly significant, as revealed by one-way analysis of variance (p < 0.001).

The activity of the right temporalis muscle was 29.04% higher (statistically highly significant, P <0.001) than the left temporalis.

Differences among the median age at diagnosis were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for Kruskal-Wallis test among all 3 groups and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for subsequent pairwise comparisons among all pairs of disorders).

As expected, there was a highly significant difference between the two groups in AQ ( t (36) = 7.9, p < 0.001).

The study was highly significant for the primary outcome ( P < 0.001) with OR of 15.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.32–56.31] for HR-MRI predicting AH.

*** indicates a highly significant difference at P ≤ 0.001.

75.47% of the patients had family income greater than Rs 5000/month which was highly significant statistically ( P <0.001). 45.28% of the patients who got admitted in critically sick condition hailed from rural area while 54.72% of the population comprised of urban society which on statistical comparison turned out to be a non-significant relation ( P >0.05).