Excerpts

At 50 μg/cm 2 a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) decrease in cell number was observed for all materials tested in both AM and NRM2 cells.

Results The results were subjected for appropriate statistical analysis; Kruskal–Wallis test revealed that intergroup comparison of the mean percentage of tubule occlusion was statistically highly significant ( P value < 0.001) [ Table 1 ] and Mann–Whitney U test showed that the tubule occlusion potential was statistically significant among all groups except for Group B and D which was not significant [ Table 2 and Figure 1 ].

A highly significant higher level of sCD200 was found among cases as compared to controls (P<0.001), while a significantly lower level of CD200 R expression on both lymphocytes and monocytes was detectable in cases as compared to controls (P < 0.001 in both instances) Table 1 .

Hazard ratios were highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating the risk of a severely dysplastic lesion developing carcinoma was 81.8 (95% CI 10.5, 635.9) times higher than for a non-dysplastic lesion (Table 4 ).

This time course is highly significant (F(4,67) = 106.2, p < 0.001, eta 2 = 0.86).

At interface 1 (LCI; restoration to luting composite), LS2 showed a highly significant continuous increase in gap formation (LGVC) from t0 to t2/t3 ( p < 0.001, effect size = 0.9, Figure 2 e, Supplement file S1 Tab.9 ).

A moderately significant negative relationship was found between the total PMS score and the self-kindness sub-scale of the Self-Compassion Scale (r: -0.572, p < 0.001), a moderately significant negative relationship was found between the total PMS score and the common humanity sub-scale of the Self-Compassion Scale (r: -0.493, p < 0.001), and a moderately significant negative relationship was found between the total PMS score and the mindfulness sub-scale of the Self-Compassion Scale (r: -0.495, p < 0.001).

As we had expected, the main effect of Manipulations was highly significant, F (3,63) = 130.82, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.862.

The Pearson chi-square test showed a highly significant association (χ2 = 105.487, df = 1, p < 0.001).

The expression of regulatory genes (Figure 6 D) showed highly significant differences detected by Kruskal Wallace, with TGFβ p = 0.001, IL10 p = 0.0017 and FOXP3 p = 0.005.

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin test revealed sufficient sampling adequacy (0.791), and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Co-colonization with two or more serotypes of lytA -positive samples over increasing post booster PCV13 time intervals showed an increasing trend (χ 2 for trend P < 0.001); this was also the case among lytA - and SP2020-positve samples (χ 2 for trend P = 0.002) (Supplementary Table S2 ).

The overall logistic fit between percentage toxicity (Y) and log concentration of ivalin (X) was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all the different exposure times.

The year-wise distribution showed highly significant results in the 9 years’ age group ( P < 0.001), where males showed increased age estimation as compared to females, with a mean difference of 0.66 years.

All three factors contribute in a highly significant manner to the observed variability in RNA segments frequency (in all cases P < 0.001).

The confounder analysis with covariates “age,” “sex,” and “PET/CT system” essentially replicated these results: the main effect of factor “group” was highly significant ( F (4,158) = 87.0, p < 0.001), with significantly higher iNPHRP scores in definite iNPH than in possible iNPH (adjusted p < 0.005), AD, PD, and HEC (adjusted p < 0.001) and significantly higher iNPHRP scores in possible iNPH than in AD, PD, and HEC (all adjusted p < 0.001).

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.77 and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was found to be highly significant (χ 2 = 10048.28, P < 0.001, df = 153).

The comparison of WHO patient care indicators between APTS and Non-APTS facilities related to the average dispensing time, percentage of drugs actually dispensed and percentage of drugs adequately labeled, showed highly significant differences (p<0.001) ( Table 3 ).

Improvement noticed in QDNOS score was found to be statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A one-sided t-test to determine whether the difference between the predicted and actual chronological age was less than 2.0 years was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.944, which is above the recommended value of 0.60, and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The difference in the prevalence of IR between the two groups was highly significant ( P <0.001) ( Table 2 ).

Regarding the effect of surgery, the portal vein diameter was significantly increased in the patients postoperatively compared with preoperatively (P=0.003), while the pulsation and resistance indexes exhibited a decreasing trend in the postoperative group (P=0.001 and P=0.003, respectively).

For statistical interpretation, P<0.05 (*) is considered significant, p<0.01 (**) is considered highly significant, and P<0.001 (***) is considered very highly significant.

The increase in ADC was found to be highly significant (uncorrected p < 0.001) in many GM and WM regions.