Excerpts

The fitted model, for which a difficulty level of “none” was set as the reference group, was highly significant ( χ 2 =45.3, p <0.001), and the results showed that (1) compared with knowledge pattern I, all the other patterns predicted less difficulty sleeping, which was significant for the very difficult group ( p =0.017) and nonsignificant for somewhat difficult; (2) compared with a deficient level of slee

For all of the investigated dependent variables, a highly significant effect was observed for the LMM intercept ( P < 0.001), reflecting model stability.

Lambda was found to be high and highly significant (λ > 0.6; p < 0.001) for all traits.

Differences among the median age at diagnosis were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for Kruskal-Wallis test among all 3 groups and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for subsequent pairwise comparisons among all pairs of disorders).

Between some population groups and some heavy metals, the difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Unmet need of family planning in husbands and wives: Only 11% of husbands reported having unmet need of family planning as compared to 17.5% of wives, and the difference was highly significant statistically ( P value<.001) [ Table 1 ].

The incidence of the eGFR < 60 showed a strong trend across the four quartiles ( p < 0.001). 4.

There was very good–excellent, and highly significant ( p < 0.001), agreement between blinded raters: intra‐class correlation coefficients = 0.97 for ‘total arm entries’, 0.87 for ‘spontaneous alternations’, and 0.81 for ‘spontaneous alternations as a function of maximum possible alternations’.

From the neonatal aspect, there was a highly significant difference between all groups regarding birth weight ( P < 0.001).

This difference between the APOE4 and the APOE3 cells is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The overall model was highly significant (R 2 = 0.91; adjusted R 2 = 0.90; RMSE = 15.5 h; MSE = 240.25 h 2 ; MAE = 16.8 h; F = 118.3; p < 0.001).

As expected, there was a highly significant positive relationship between time post-bloodmeal and the proportion of mosquitoes with ruptured oocysts ( LRT X 2 1 = 147, P < 0.001, Fig. 1 a).

We observed highly significant positive correlation between LAS and GLS ( R = 0.804, P < 0.001), moderate positive correlation between LAS and GCS ( R = 0.760, P < 0.001), and moderate negative correlation between LAS and GRS ( R = −0.757, P < 0.001).

The highly significant ( p < 0.001) F IS value (0.0923) revealed a rather high inbreeding degree within populations.

Cochran–Armitage testing verified a highly significant positive trend in target attainment (Z = 8.42, p < 0.001).

The statistical analysis of these data ( Table 2 ) showed highly significant differences between S. byzantina (SB) and other Stachys sp.: SO, SG, SS, and SR ( p < 0.001) and significant differences between S. byzantina (SB) and S. palustris ( p = 0.011).

These differences were highly significant (in both comparisons, P < 0.001).

In most cases, this difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with the exception of SNP assay 5 (Wnt-4), SNP assay 9 (Spr-1) and SNP assay 11 (Spr-2) (Figure 4 , Table 5 ).

However, linear regressions demonstrated highly significant relationships of age with YR ( t = 14.1, p < 0.001) and with LTH ( t = 9.4, p < 0.001), an anticipated unavoidable severe bias for which we have used statistical correction.

The Procrustes ANOVA performed on the shape variables confirmed the groups clustering observed in the PCA and returned highly significant results (F 2,21 = 8.725; r 2 = 0.478; p -value = 0.001).

For the P 135 condition there was a highly significant effect of position ( F (1, 9) = 38.898; p < .001), with the orientation discrimination test threshold at the trained position ( Fig 3B , black circle) being lower than the average threshold of all other test positions ( Fig 3B , black square).

A highly significant correlation was found between bone involvement and hepatic, splenic, and concurrent hepato-splenic disease ( p < 0.001).

Leaf relative water content, water potential and surface temperature The results of the ART-ANOVA analysis revealed that, during the drought phase, both drought ( D ) and temperature ( T ) had highly significant effects ( P < 0.001) on RWC, LWP and LST ( Supplementary Table S1 available as Supplementary Data at Tree Physiology Online).

According to two-way analysis of variance, a highly significant difference between serotypes was observed (F = 10.9; p < 0.001), as well as a highly significant effects of time (days) (F = 1906.4; p < 0.001) and interaction between serotypes and time (F = 7.7, p < 0.001) were observed.

BSA sorption to lotrafilcon B showed a trend similar to HEL, with more BSA detected on the surface compared to the bulk region after the RINSE procedure, as seen in Figure 3C,D (p<0.001).