Excerpts

The analysis revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), with a Cramer’s V = 0.65, indicating a large effect size.

For the region of Campinas, the number of cases of CIN3 and AIS registered yearly over time was compared with the cancer registries and showed a trend towards increase (121 cases in 2001 and 177 cases in 2012, p < 0.001) ( Fig. 1 , dotted line).

Blood loss and uterine artery seal Average blood loss during hysterectomy with vessel sealers was 111±53.31 ml versus 320±193.90 ml with sutures, the difference being highly significant (p=0.001) (Figure 3 ).

There was a strong and highly significant correlation between the total and the MAP species numbers (r s = 0.77, p < 0.001), and the two most species-rich sites, Žuklijai and Pamiškė, contained the highest total and MAP species numbers.

A deletion of both aliC and aliD resulted in a highly significant decrease ( P < 0.001) in the intracellular Ply level compared to that of strain MNZ41, and this effect was also observed with a single deletion of aliD ( Fig. 3A ).

All LLRs were highly significant (p < 0.001) with the most coefficients of determination values.

SHRs (ADHD model) who received either MDL (5-HT2A antagonist) or IPS (5-HT1A agonist) or GFC (alpha-2 adrenergic agonist) showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in these study parameters (mean distance traveled, mean movement velocity) when compared to the SHR-NC group ( Figure 1 A,B).

The difference was highly significant (χ 2 = 53.05, p < 0.001).

Non-parametric sensitivity analyses Kruskal-Wallis H test comparing sentiment across all reaction types was highly significant (H = 1430.53, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.063), indicating that reaction type explains approximately 6.3% of variance in sentiment scores.

A highly significant effect of event category was found (F(3,38) = 17.84; P < 0.001).

These criteria were highly significant in the distinction between patients according to disease recurrence (MC p = 0.001, UTS criteria p < 0.001, Asan criteria p < 0.001, AFP score p = 0.009).

The statistical analysis showed highly significant improvement (p<0.001) in functional outcome assessed by the Lysholm score and joint stability (p<0.001) ( Table 2 ).

Results Effect of AA on charcoal-induced gut transit changes In the animals of standard group the total length traveled by activated charcoal was found to be highly significant (p < 0.001) as compared to control value at 15 and 30 min respectively.

The moderation effects of child gender and problem severity were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

3.6 Correlation matrix POD activity exhibited a highly significant positive correlation ( P < 0.001) with chlorophyll b, AsA, and root Cd contents under Cd stress.

The collapsed comparison remained highly significant (chi-square = 2645.39, p < 0.001) with a Jensen–Shannon divergence of 0.0351, indicating that while most four-class disagreement was absorbed by the collapse, the LLM still assigned substantially more posts to Negative and fewer to Neutral/Positive than the human labels.

The difference in prevalence among the seasons was highly significant (p<0.001) ( Table-2 ).

A simple computation reveals that, for n = 223, the Spearman rank correlation between the two sets of scores (the number of pairwise interactions won and the total sum of the number of points won) is ρ = − .45; it is negative and highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The model assessing final BCVA showed a moderately significant association (R2 = 0.324, P < .001).

All pairwise comparisons of contact corners and contact region songs and syllables were highly significant (p < 0.001, Tables 2c and 3c ), showing that USVs emitted in the two social regions differed strongly in all measured parameters ( Fig 4b ).

A highly significant increase (P < 0.001) was observed in LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio in HFD group in comparison to the control group.

Although all pairwise comparisons between TMRCA, expansion time, and N e were highly significant ( P < 0.001, table 2 ), the ρ values ranged from 0.61 to 0.75.

These differences were highly significant (in both comparisons, P < 0.001).

However, the effect of age × gender was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

Among them, the social value shows a highly significant positive effect (β = 0.520, p < 0.001), followed by the economic value (β = 0.486, p < 0.001).