Using the highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) binding data [ 24 ], we calculated for each TF the pair-wise Pearson correlation coefficients among expression profiles of its target genes (i.e. the TF cohort).
Excerpts
The statistical results confirm the hypothesis that the differences between the results are either not significant ( p > 0.05), significant (0.001 < p < 0.05), or highly significant ( p < 0.001). 4.
The best fit regression line (in logarithmic units) had a highly significant positive slope of 0.05 ( R 2 = 0.40, t = 5.25, p < .001), meaning that an increase in spatial frequency of a factor of 10 will increase summation by around 12% (1 dB).
In concordance with the pattern of increasing genetic distance with increasing geographic distance, Mantel tests revealed highly significant isolation by distance in P . filiformis (P<0.001; S1 Fig ) Correspondingly, the neighbor-joining tree of pairwise genetic distance generally grouped populations according to geography ( Fig 2 ), with populations in the four main geographical areas grouping separately, with each group separated by long branches.
sCD14-ST displayed a highly significant positive correlation with CRP and SuPAR ( p < 0.001), and a significant positive correlation with IL-6 and IL-10 ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), while it displayed a significant negative correlation with sRAGE ( p < 0.05) 4.
ANOVA showed highly significant differences among groups for time to hemostasis (F (3, 996) = 4150.3; p < 0.001) and ambulation time (F (3, 996) = 5954.8; p < 0.001).
Morphometric Assessments Thickness of the Stratum Pyramidale (SP) Morphometric analysis of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained hippocampal sections revealed a highly significant reduction (F (6, 14) = 16.72, P ≤ 0.001) in the thickness of the stratum pyramidale (SP) within the CA1 region in the Sc-treated group compared to both the control and Cr-treated groups.
The differences in total genetic variation partitioned into two levels (among populations and within populations) were tested According to the analysis, there was a higher variation within (80%) and a lower one among populations (19%) All values were highly significant (p < 0.001) ( Table 5 ).
The time of measurement and the treatment × time interaction were highly significant (monthly measurement: F 16,160 = 6.78, p < 0.001, treatment × time: F 16,160 = 3.36, p < 0.001), indicating that all populations were growing, and that there were time-dependent differences in growth rates in the inbred and outbred founded populations (see Figure 3 ).
Conditional on any outage, both associations were substantially larger and highly significant (Theme 3: +0.77; Theme 4: +0.56; both P < 0.001), indicating that severity disparities are concentrated among tracts that lost power.
LMO4 overexpression boosts IL-21-mediated STAT3 signaling to orchestrate a memory-promoting gene regulatory network Among the pathways influenced by both LMO4 and c-Myb manipulation, we also observed a highly significant enrichment of the Reactome pathway R-MMU-1280215, which relates to cytokine signaling ( P < 0.001) and includes several molecules involved in STAT signaling (Fig. 4e , Supplementary Table 5 ).
Similarly, the data for cPTSD showed a significant effect of exposure to war trauma, with children who experienced more trauma having a higher mean number of probable cPTSD cases (M = 15.53, SD = 3.00) than those with less exposure (M = 12.97, SD = 3.25), a finding that was also highly significant (t(248) = 5.79, p < .001). 3.6.
The difference was highly significant for both SUSI and SBR (e.g., multi-site/multi-camera setting: putaminal SUSI = 0.993, striatal SUSI = 0.978, p < 0.001, Table 1 ).
(6) TPC / Y = - 62.6204 + 1.85069 C - 0.00121359 AC - 0.000351711 BD - 0.00645962 B 2 - 0.0154177 C 2 - 0.000259437 D 2 ANOVA for the regression model indicated that the model was highly significant ( P < 0.001 ), while the lack-of-fit term was not significant (P = 0.0663 > 0.01), confirming the suitability of the model ( Table 5 ).
According to the results of the Pearson correlation analysis, a positive and moderately significant relationship was found between teachers’ perceived principal trust and their organizational commitment ( r =.675, p <.001).
actinomycetemcomitans showed a statistically significant difference at 2 h ( t = 4.54, P < 0.01) and highly significant difference at 4 h ( t = 6.57, P < 0.001).
There were highly significant differences between the TPC scores (F = 665, p < 0.001).
The results of the univariate linear regression analysis indicated a highly significant negative correlation between the sqrt of MMA and cognitive score ( B = −0.47, p < 0.001).
The genotypes exhibited a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
The improvement in VCSS was statistically highly significant in both groups ( P < .001 for both).
The difference remained highly significant after adjusting for differences in weight loss (%) ( P < 0.001).
The results of the Spearman correlation coefficient revealed a moderately significant correlation between COVID-19 precautionary behavior and risk perception ( r = 0. 0.54, p < .001) in addition to a weak significant correlation between knowledge and both risk perceptions and adherence to precautionary behavior ( r = 0.26 and 0.19, P < 0.001, respectively).
The association between age category and infection status was highly significant (χ2 = 159.4, df = 2, p < 0.001).
The Cuzick test ( Cuzick, 1985 ) for trend across the groups 1–3 was highly significant ( P <0.001).
In the fungal community ( Figure 6 b), Glomeromycota showed a highly significant negative correlation with TK (blue, p < 0.001), representing the strongest correlation among all fungal phyla, indicating that TK content exerts a strong regulatory effect on the distribution of this group.