Excerpts

The difference between the expected similarity of the introns in these transposons based on the waxy gene data (52% of 227 = 118) and the observed similarity (89% of 227 = 202) is highly significant ( p < 0.001 using a χ 2 test).

All within-group comparisons were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 9 ).

The number of these susceptible persister colonies increases with the number of resistant colonies present ( Figure 3b ; R 2 =0.8384, F 1,16 =87.907, P <0.0001) and over time, as shown by the highly significant resistant colonies by time interaction term ( Figure 3c ; F 1,92 = 17.85, P< 0.001).

In contrast, DeepSeek received 70.39% Excellent, 22.37% Good, 7.02% Normal, and only 0.22% Awful rating, with a highly significant difference observed between the two models ( p < 0.001).

Any cardiovascular event was documented in 37.8% of subjects from the low-risk group, 44.4% in the moderate-risk group, and 73.5% in the high-risk group, with the trend being statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Results Effect of AA on charcoal-induced gut transit changes In the animals of standard group the total length traveled by activated charcoal was found to be highly significant (p < 0.001) as compared to control value at 15 and 30 min respectively.

3.4 Survival estimates according to LRGmax, LRGsum, and LRG ratio The DFS difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001), as were the differences between the groups of LRGmax 0–1 and LRGmax 2–3 ( p < 0.001), the groups of LRGmax 0–1 and LRGmax 4–5 ( p < 0.001) and the groups of LRGmax 2–3 and LRGmax 4–5 ( p = 0.002, Table 2 , Figure 3A ).

Genotoxicity was, for example, much less impressive than that of the positive controls EMS (approximately 30% tail DNA at 0.75 mM), or 4NQO where concentrations of 0.075 up to 0.25 μg/mL showed highly significant increases of DNA damage ( P < 0.001, results not shown).

KRAS codon 13 polymorphisms were identified in 21.4% of iCCA patients, were absent in OV cases, and were present in 17.5% of healthy controls, demonstrating a highly significant difference (P < 0.001).

The IPS showed a clear trend of increasing mortality risk across quartiles, with HR reaching 2.044 in Q4 ( P < 0.001).

A very highly significant CE prevalence of 29.1% was found in goats in Moroto ( χ 2 = 4473.7, P < 0.001) than in Kumi (0.6%), Luwero (0.6%) and Nakasongola (0.2%); similar trends were also observed in sheep (28%) in Moroto district ( χ 2 = 981.4, P < 0.001), Kumi district (2.1%) and none (0%) in both Luwero and Nakasongola districts; and in zebu cattle (31.3%; χ 2 = 631.3, P < 0.001) in Moroto, Kumi (1.8%) and Luwero districts (1.6%) and none in Nakasongola district.

An unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) of RNA-seq data revealed a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) between the pre and post conditions (before the first step and before the second step, respectively) in the second principal component, which accounts for 7% of the total transcriptional variability ( Fig. 6 B).

At 72 hours, however, the activity is higher at in the experimental groups and was highly significant ( p <0.001, 32% increase) at the concentration of 10 μM of quercetin.

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.001.

The statistical methods were verified using a significant value of p <0.05 and a highly significant level of p <0.001.

Clinical parameters, such as BMI, WC, SBP, DBP, FPG, 2hPG, HbA1c, FINS, HOMA-IR, ALT, AST, GGT, TG, TC, and LDL-C, displayed an increasing trend from quartile 1 to quartile 4 (all P < 0.001; Table 2 ).

Its coefficient—in the detection probability submodel—was strongly negative and highly significant (Tables S3 : − 3.38 for the position on the ground, P < 0.001).

The IC 50 value of the leishmanicidal and cytotoxicity activity test showed that highly significant difference between the tested samples and the standards at p < 0.001 ( Table 1 ).

Differences are considered statistically significant at a value of p < 0.05 (denoted as *); very significant at a value of p < 0.01(denoted as # ) and extremely significant at a value of p < 0.001 (denoted as ⋆ ).

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a trend consistent with the survival results of the DNA methylation model associated with TCD (Log‐rank test p < 0.001, Figure 4G , right).

After collapsing DSM into two categories, required (DSM 1, 2) and not required (DSM 3, 4, 5, 6), we still see a highly significant increase in IF for journals with required data sharing (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, p < 0.001, 2013 and 2014 data) ( Fig. 2 ).

For the EOS, a likelihood ratio test showed that the interaction between flow regime and drought status was marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 10.59, p = 0.001).

Additionally, while there were non-significant between-group differences in the pre-intervention measurements (all p ≥ 0.087), highly significant between-group differences existed in the post-intervention measurements (all p < 0.001), with better values (higher MPV) for the FST Group ( Table 4 ).

Furthermore, the statistical significance was defined as follows: P < 0.05 (significant), P < 0.01 (highly significant), P < 0.001 (very highly significant), and P < 0.0001 (extremely significant).

The log-rank test revealed a highly significant difference between the survival curves ( χ 2 = 28.57, df = 2; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3 ).