Very highly significant correlation coefficients ( r =0.7601, p <0.001) noticed between salt tolerant indices of survivability rate and root length as well as shoot length and shoot weight ( r =0.6997, 0.8897 p <0.001) indicate that they have very strong positive correlation among each other.
Excerpts
To compare the accuracy of factors identified by regression analysis, we included the three factors with highly significant results ( p < 0.001; age, life satisfaction, and cognitive level) and the six factors with significant results ( p < 0.05; age, final educational level, residential area, regular exercise, life satisfaction, and cognitive level) in the comparison.
We also identified an increasing trend in for IGRA positivity with increasing incarceration time (Cochran–Armitage test for trend, p < 0.001).
Unpacking this interaction in separate ANOVAS for each bin revealed that the first four bins had all produced highly significant cue–target compatibility effects ( p < 0.001).
Analysis of variance showed that the difference was highly significant (P < 0.001).
Notably, the observed shifts in down- and upregulated parameters were highly significant for both, brain and liver tissue ( p ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 2 C), and highly significant changes exist by comparing brain with liver tissue utilizing the Fisher ́s exact test.
Specifically, we could demonstrate an inverse association with renal function as displayed by a highly significant correlations with the glomerular filtration rate of cystatin C (r = − 0.675, p < 0.001), cystatin C (r = 0.675, p < 0.001), creatinine (r = 0.629, p < 0.001) and urea (r = 0.623, p < 0.001) serum concentrations (Table 3 ), indicating renal clearance of MR-proANP [ 45 ].
There was also a highly significant statistical difference between the analyzed extracts in this system ( p < 0.001).
However, the context × meaning interaction seems to be mostly driven by differences in imitating intransitive actions: imitation of intransitive MF actions and imitation of intransitive ML actions were highly significant (Tukey, P < 0.001) (with Bonferroni correction for P values).
The overall model demonstrated good discriminative ability with a concordance statistic of 0.786 (SE = 0.036) and was highly significant according to likelihood ratio test ( χ 2 = 22.07, df = 6, p = 0.001), Wald test ( χ 2 = 19.84, df = 6, p = 0.003) and logrank test ( χ 2 = 22.28, df = 6, p = 0.001) (Table 3 ).
DMRs in SAS fish were twice as frequently hypo-methylated relative to wild fish than hyper-methylated and this difference was highly significant (68%: 193/284 hypo-DMRs; 32%: 91/284 hyper-DMRs; binomial P -value < 0.001).
The total effect of Reciprocity on Intention was highly significant ( β = .35, p < .001), demonstrating that Reciprocity exerts both direct and indirect influences.
In contrast, obesity (BMI: 27.5-37.5 kg/m 2 ) was even more prevalent among 68 (52%) female cases in comparison to 6 (12%) female controls, and frequency distribution of BMI was highly significant ( p < 0.001) among them.
The histological type and grade, as well as ER and TP53 mutation status all showed a highly significant skewed distribution between the gene expression groups ( p < 0.001; Figure 4 ).
In gamergates, which have a much lower basal catalase activity, the reduction was only slight but also highly significant (statistics, see above, t = 8.37, p<0.001).
Smoking for peer pressure, recreation and proving manhood were all found to be highly significant (p<0.001).
For both motif scores and GC content, there was a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) between false positives and correct negatives.
Specifically, in the Asudyn ® group, a statistically significant difference was observed between T0 and T1 ( p = 0.007), and a highly significant difference was found between T0 and T2 ( p < 0.001).
Correlation analysis between the frequency of CD4 + and CD8 + MAIT cells demonstrated that as the percentage of CD4 + MAIT cells increased, the frequency of CD8 + MAIT cells exhibited a decreasing trend in the OLP group ( r = -0.5682, p < 0.001, n = 40, Fig. 2 D).
The Kruskal‐Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference in completeness scores among the various reporter types (H = 569.68; p < 0.001).
A one-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of language on this measure, F (2, 94) = 64.3, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.449.
This interaction was highly significant ( Table 2 , χ 2 1,10 = 357.6, p < 0.001).
In terms of changes before and after each session, GLMM results indicated a highly significant post-session main effect on all VAS measures, including perceived stress (β = −18.34, p < 0.001), energy (β = 7.01, p < 0.001), tension (β = −21.78, p < 0.001), and valence (β = 14.13, p < 0.001).
AMs of both age groups showed high preferential uptake for (-)NPs; however, the aged AM group demonstrated a highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in uptake of (-)NPs ( Fig. 4 B ) .
This is further supported by the strong and highly significant correlations observed between the 1-second and 5-second videos for both valence (ρ = .80, p < .001) and arousal (ρ = .89, p < .001).