Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results show that introducing the DWR-DRB module alone increased mAP50 from 85.4% to 87.0% ( p = 0.008, d = 1.12), indicating its significant effect on sparse feature extraction; the addition of SPD-Conv further improved mAP50 to 87.9% ( p = 0.012, d = 0.98), validating its role in preserving fine-grained features; the mAP50 of the complete model (integrating all modules) reached 91.0%, showing a highly significant difference compared to the baseline YOLOv8’s 85.4% ( p = 0.002, d = 2.05), with an effect size exceeding 1.5, proving that the performance improvement is practically meaningful.
highly significantp=0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In this second group, 60% of the patient's had a cardiac structural abnormality to account for the cause of sudden death, versus 23% of the methadone subjects, a highly significant difference (p=0.002, Pearson chi-square) [ 68 ].
The Impact of Opioids on Cardiac Electrophysiology.
Curr Cardiol Rev · 2016 · PMC4807715
moderately significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The separate analyses of linear correlation in subjects without and with colorectal lesions revealed a moderately significant positive correlation in those without lesions between feces putrescine and spermidine ( r = 0.685, p = 0.002, n = 18), N -acetyl putrescine ( r = 0.606, p = 0.008, n = 18), and cadaverine ( r = 0.591, p = 0.01, n = 18).
highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The positive correlation for subgroup C ( r C = 0.510, N = 33) ( Table 3 ) indicated a highly significant increase in network variability with age (P = 0.002); in contrast, that correlation in subgroup D was negative ( r D = − 0.143, N = 10) but not statistically significant (P = 0.693).
highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, after removing the weight change attributable to litter size, there remained a highly significant increase in weight of HET pups produced from Eed del/del growing oocytes compared to HET pups produced from Eed wt/del oocytes ( t 34.8 = 3.44, P = 0.002) and WT pups produced from either Eed wt/del ( t 36.3 = 2.81, P = 0.008) or Eed wt/wt ( t 33.1 = 2.29, P = 0.03) growing oocytes (Fig. 3e ).
Loss of maternal EED results in postnatal overgrowth.
Clin Epigenetics · 2018 · PMC6045828
markedly significantP=0.0020.0× alphaqualified
The difference of cell proliferation indexes between cancer cells were well, moderate and poorly differentiated, and was markedly significant (χ 2 =26.334, P=0.002), and suggested that liver cancer cell proliferation was positively correlated with GPC3 expression (r=0.316, P=0.001).