Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlation coefficient of anterior drawer displacement between examiners was highly significant in supported ADT ( R = 0.537; P = 0.002; 95% CI, 0.22–0.75), and with the numbers available, there was no significant correlation in traditional ADT ( R = 0.067; P = 0.728; 95% CI, -0.30–0.42) (Fig. 4 ).
highly significantp = .0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In Experiment 1, initial fixation position was the only measure for which the effect of morpheme positional frequency exceeded the effect of the reading phase, and the only measure whose morpheme positional frequency effect was highly significant (p = .002), hinting at a tight linkage between this measure and initial morpheme positional frequency.
an increasing trendp = 0.0020.0× alphagold
Results The latent variable growth model showed a decreasing trend in frailty (S = −0.197, p = 0.013) and an increasing trend in postoperative cognitive function (S = 0.124, p = 0.002) from T1 to T3 in elderly spinal surgery patients; at the initial level, frailty was negatively correlated with cognitive function ( r = −0.452, p < 0.001), and initial levels of frailty negatively predicted the self development rate ( β = −0.516, p < 0.001), the initial level of frailty negatively predicted the development rate of postoperative cognitive function ( β = −0.321, p = 0.003), and the initial level of postoperative cognitive function positively predicted the development rate of frailty ( β = 0.192, p = 0.031).
markedly significantP=0.0020.0× alphaqualified
The difference of cell proliferation indexes between cancer cells were well, moderate and poorly differentiated, and was markedly significant (χ 2 =26.334, P=0.002), and suggested that liver cancer cell proliferation was positively correlated with GPC3 expression (r=0.316, P=0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Of particular interest were the highly significant suppressive species abundant on nematode cuticles, including ASVs of Burkholderia‐Caballeronia‐Paraburkholderia (ASV82, R 2 = 0.6, p < 0.002; ASV213, R 2 = 0.74, p < 0.001) and Pseudomonas (ASV108, R 2 = 0.79, p < 0.001; ASV246, R 2 = 0.44, p < 0.002).
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of the immunolabeled areas of Aβ42 and Aβ40 fractions revealed a highly significant increase in Aβ42 deposited in treated animals relative to Aβ40 (i.e., decreased Aβ40/Aβ42 ratio), for both the facilitator‐treated (26.9% ± 4.21%, p = 0.002) and inhibitor‐treated groups (18.2% ± 2.80%, p < 0.0001) compared to control animals (47.6% ± 6.67%), without any significant difference between the treated groups ( p = 0.151) (Figure 4E ).
highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The positive correlation for subgroup C ( r C = 0.510, N = 33) ( Table 3 ) indicated a highly significant increase in network variability with age (P = 0.002); in contrast, that correlation in subgroup D was negative ( r D = − 0.143, N = 10) but not statistically significant (P = 0.693).
highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Excitingly, independent from the association with age, we found a highly significant association (Kruskal–Wallis test, H = 12.23, P = 0.002) and correlation ( r s = 0.408, P < 0.001) between TMEM106B CTFs and the disease-associated TMEM106B haplotypes, with higher amounts of insoluble TMEM106B CTFs in individuals carrying the risk haplotype.