Excerpts

Blood sugar fasting before and after study in yoga group patients was 97.2 ± 11.0 g/dl and 91.9 ± 5.5 g/dl, respectively, which is statistically highly significant with P = 0.002.

This trend was highly significant for telomerase activity (univariate test of significance for planned comparison, F = 13.07, p = 0.002), and it was borderline significant for TL ( F = 4.07, p = 0.06).

The expectations toward an ideal e-mental health app were not related to the age of the participants, except in the factor transparency in the group of the patients: The older the patient, the more emphasis he or she put on the opinion that an ideal e-mental health app should be transparent (ie, clear who designed the app, scientific evidence, etc) with a highly significant association ( r =.35, P =.002; experts: r =–0.01, P =.88; students: r =–0.02, P =.87).

The difference at each corresponding dose was highly significant ( P < 0.002).

The difference between the irradiated and non-irradiated group was highly significant ( P = 0.002).

However, we detected (Table 2 ) a slightly significant lifespan modulation (LogRank p = 0.002) when klotho knockdown was assessed in a daf-2 (m577) genetic background (Figure 4C ).

In a continuous assessment, improved adherence by two points is associated with a highly significant ( P -value=0.002) reduction in overall cancer incidence.

There was a significant trend for duration of use ( P trend =0.004) with an OR of 0.66 (95% CI 0.51–0.86, P =0.002) for more than 24 months of use.

This was nominally significant (p = 0.002), and after correction for 4 pro-inflammatory genotypes and the 4 measures investigated this finding remains of borderline significance (16 tests, corrected p = 0.03).

Comparing CYP26B1 negative and weakly positive tumours with CYP26B1 moderate and strong expressing tumours showed that there was a highly significant association with survival (HR = 1.465, 95%CI = 1.151–1.865, χ 2 = 9.832, p = 0.002).

However, when separate analyses were conducted for each year, sample date was highly significant for both 2007 and 2009 (P = 0.002 in both years).

IL-7, which had borderline significance ( p = 0.002) in the cytokine antibody array experiment, was also tested.

These differences were statistically highly significant ( p = 0.002).

Nominally significant interactions between LR and HR groups were observed for correlations between YMRS total scores and left superior frontal surface area ( p = 0.002, uncorrected) (Fig. 4A ), CBCL total score and right lateral orbitofrontal surface area ( p = 0.005, uncorrected) (Fig. 4B ), and CBCL dysregulation subscale scores and right lateral orbitofrontal surface area (p = 0.008, uncorrected) (Fig. 4C ).

However, there was a highly significant statistical difference in the type of plasma expander used between them ( P = 0.002).

The difference between N400s elicited by English scientific metaphors and conventional metaphors was marginally significant at the left and middle parietal regions [P3: t (16) = −1.79, p = 0.091; Pz: t (16) = −1.90, p = 0.076], significant at the right frontal and central regions [F4: t (16) = −3.33, p = 0.004; C4: t (16) = −3.50, p = 0.003], and highly significant at the right parietal region [P4: t (16) = −3.65, p = 0.002].

The interactions between the two gene modifications were also highly significant for both brain regions (p = 0.002 for hippocampus, and p = 0.005 for cortex).

Expression differences between polygyne workers of different Gp-9 genotype ( BB , Bb ) were confirmed to be highly significant for all 39 genes identified by the ANOVA (all P <0.002), as were expression differences between BB workers of different social form for all 91 genes identified by the ANOVA (all P <0.002).

Amongst these, ten corresponded to HERVs, of which nine were Bonferroni significant features in the analysis comprising the full cohort (Bonferroni P < 0.05), whereas the tenth feature was only nominally significant (HERVL18_6p22.1c, TWAS P = 0.002).

Zeta-potential decrease was observed for these proteoliposomes as well, and in comparison with control liposomes proved to be highly significant ( Figure 3E ; n = 5, p = 0.002).

Our analysis has also clearly shown that the difference between Chinese male and Chinese female patients is highly significant ( p < 0.002, Table 5 ).

In men, there was a significant trend across the mean values of 4 quantiles of SFA for HT ( P = .002), FL-US ( P < .001), and ALT-E ( P < .001), but not for DL, IGM, or GGTP-E.

The statistical analysis of error rates revealed no significant main effect of Set [ F (1,22) = 1.10, p = 0.307, η p 2 = 0.047], but a highly significant main effect of Target [F(1,22) = 12.11, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.355] with lower error rates for target repetitions.

Comparison of CSG with RSI detected a highly significant correlation ( r 2 = 0.74, P = 0.002).

fat percentage) ( P = 0.00001) and no effect when the outcome was BMI; the difference in results was highly significant ( P = 0.002).