Excerpts

In this instance, a one-sample t -test was extremely significant ( T = 3.58, df = 11, p = 0.002).

Finally, consistent with this selective context-memory order-effect, a highly significant correlation was identified between context-memory retention for List2 information in the Nap-group and prior stage-2 NREM sleep ( r = 0.77, P = 0.002, Figure 4D ), yet no such association between context-memory for List1 information and stage-2 NREM was observed ( r = 0.16, P = 0.60, Figure 4B ).

By contrast, the main effect on feature-based inter-trial effects was statistically highly significant, F (7,116) = 3.6, p = 0.002.

cochlear implant hearing aid electroencephalography auditory evoked potentials source localization speech recognition bimodal benefit auditory rehabilitation Post-implantation, paired t tests ( t values) and Wilcoxon tests in case of non-normality ( z values) showed significant improvements of speech recognition with the CI ear between T3 and T4 for the OlSa S0 ( z = 3.296, ∗∗ p < 0.001), S0N0 ( t = 3.300, ∗∗ p < 0.001), and S0NHA ( z = 2.638, ∗ p < 0.009) conditions when applying the Bonferroni-corrected significance limen for significant ∗ ( p < 0.01) and highly significant ∗∗ ( p < 0.002) differences ( Figure 1 ).

Notably, IBE analysis demonstrated a highly significant correlation for Neon. orientalis ( r =0.464, P =0.002) compared to the other two species.

Moreover, the average motor pointing direction in perceptual probe trials (compare Figure 6B ) correlated negatively with the average perceived pointing direction (compare Figure 3C ) in the perceptual probe trials preceded by the same manipulation: analysed on the population level, this correlation exhibited a strong effect size and was highly significant (r(7) = −0.88, P = .002).

Results MR images and dMRI revealed the development of a highly significant increase in BBB permeability (P < 0.002) and ventricle size (P < 0.0001) among infected rats.

The main effects of the groups were highly significant (F (4, 42.647) = 5.250, p = 0.002).

In consequence, 6 months after randomisation, the difference in mean change between the two treatment groups (−13.5 cm 3 ; 95% CI −21.7 to −5.2) was highly significant ( P = 0.002).

The regression retained only skin yellowness as a predictor of attractiveness, and the effect of skin yellowness was positive and highly significant (F(1,71) = 10.806, Beta = .366, t = 3.287, p<.002).

3.64 prey/h), and this is highly significant (Mann–Whitney U = 5.0, p = 0.002, r = 0.90). 3.3.

Univariate ANCOVAs for single parameters revealed highly significant differences between groups for heart rate [F(3,69) = 6.8; p<.002], for RMSSD HRV [F(3,69) = 13.5; p<.001], for LF HRV [F(3,69) = 7.6; p<.001], for HF HRV [F(3,69) = 9.9; p<.001], for compression entropy HC HRV [F(3,69) = 10.8; p<.001], and for respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) [F(3,69) = 17.8; p<.001].

In fact, reduced concentrations of IgA, IgG and IgM were seen in all MS patients who underwent apheresis ( n =6), with the decrease in IgG levels being highly significant (from 4.21 to 0.82 g/L or -81% on average, p =0.002).

A further finding of our study is the highly significant correlation between nuclear YB-1 expression and negativity of the progesterone receptor status (p = 0.002), which has not been described so far.

A likelihood ratio test of the reduced model against the null model revealed a significant trend of decreasing entropy (linear mixed-effect: χ 2 (1) = 9.45, P = 0.002).

By contrast, left-sided colon cancers showed a highly significant increase in histidine 113 `slow' allele compared with controls (P = 0.002; OR = 4.1).

A highly significant negative rela- tionship between RAF1 protein levels and T50 in wtp53 cells (r = -0.97, P = 0.002) (Figure 6C) which was not present in the six cell lines bearing p53 mutations (r = 0.19, P = 0.72) (Figure 6F) was observed.

However, for the top 300 bound regions, there is an obvious further preferential overlap among A-P early regulators as well as a moderate preference among the A-P pair rule factors and the D-V factors (Bonferroni corrected Mann Whitney tests suggest that, taken collectively, the preferential co-binding among A-P early regulators is highly significant ( P < 9 × 10 -15 ), while that among the A-P pair rule factors and the D-V factors is moderately significant ( P < 2 × 10 -3 ) for both; Additional data file 13).

A borderline significance of the same compound genotype was also detected between the two control groups of EBV/IgA/VCA negative vs. positive individuals (OR = 0.25, p = 0.002).

Age‐adjusted HRs for ADI in relation to ADRD incidence increased as neighborhood disadvantage increased, from 1.30 (95% CI 0.95–1.77) in the second quintile to 1.52 (95% CI 1.13–2.04) in the fifth quintile, with a significant trend ( p = 0.002) as shown in Table 3 .

Although this shift in mean frequency is not statistically significant due to the broad range of anti-NS3 responses, the changes for individual subjects are highly significant ( P = .002 for Healthy Control 1; P = .005 for Healthy Control 2).

This difference was highly significant (P = 0.002).

adiacens showed an increasing trend ( P = 0.002, q = 0.42) in the gut microbiome after oral feeding; the abundance of Streptococcus sp. also increased ( P = 0.006, q = 0.56), although it did not reach statistical significance.

Five year postoperative survival is 33% and a highly significant trend (P=0.002) in favour of the older patients is reported.

The difference in PS change between responders and non-responders is highly significant (P = 0.002).