Postoperative radiochemotherapy was highly significant associated with development of LEL ( p = 0.002).
Excerpts
At the left molar region, 60% of the subjects showed lingual positioning of the neutral zone in Group I, and the percentage increased to 80% in Group II and 93.3% in Group III, which is highly significant ( P = 0.002) [ Table 4 ].
This model revealed a highly significant result explaining 50% of measured functional connectivity (R2 = 0.50; adjusted R2 = 0.42, F-value = 5.9; P = 0.002).
The spatial frequency threshold, a measure of visual behavior, showed a highly significant decrease in Herc3 -/- mice (Fig. 5 a, p = 0.002) compared to Herc3 + / + mice.
The final difference was highly significant, with a 46% response rate for the former versus 22% for the latter (p =0.002).
HADS-A score and anxiety rate at different time points HADS-A score was 6.9 ± 3.1, 7.3 ± 3.1, 7.7 ± 3.3, and 8.0 ± 3.5 at M0, M12, M24, and M36, respectively, which exhibited an increasing trend ( P = .002) (Table S1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/MD/G520 ) (Fig. 1 A).
Results Hypothesis 1: Cultural differences in grooming As predicted, after controlling for the effects of Time and Focal Status, a highly significant main effect was found for Country, b = 1.18, SE = .37, p = .002, with more counts of grooming per participants in Burma-Myanmar ( M = 67.61, SD = 134.28) as compared to the United States ( M = 16.54, SD = 30.04).
BMI showed a highly significant and positive correlation with plasma insulin ( r = 0.294, P = 0.002) and HOMA-IR levels ( r = 0.327, P = 0.04) in T2DM patients.
The highly significant results in all 3 kinds of aggressive emotions (anger: P =.002, offensive: P <.001, hate: P =.005) matched with the observation in our infoveillance study, that is, people under lockdown have higher aggression levels.
The interaction term was only marginally significant, and post-hoc t-tests revealed a decrease in response time with practice in the SI group (p = 0.002), but not in the II group (p = 0.358).
In contrast to the above-mentioned similar Ki67 correlations in ILC and IDC, there was a highly significant inverse relationship between ER/PR status and high-Ki67 subset for IDC in both cohorts ( p ≤0.002; Table 4 ), but no significant relationship between ER or PR status and high/low Ki67 subset for ILC irrespective of whether evaluated separately or together ( p >0.6; Table 3 ).
35 One randomized trial (RCT) was performed on 60 patients in 1992, with a highly significant benefit of pacing being shown ( p < 0.002), 36 with a second RCT by another group in 2007 serving to confirm the earlier results. 37 CSS became fully accepted as having a strong indication for pacing and is classified as a Class 1 indication, level of evidence B in the current ESC Guideli
The analysis of mean retinal thickness demonstrated a marked reduction in myopic eyes compared to emmetropic eyes, with the difference being highly significant ( p = 0.002).
day 14) on survival was found to be statistically highly significant (OR: 0.42, p = 0.002).
Without this outlier, the interaction between TMS and Task was highly significant [ F (1,22) = 11.7, P = 0.002]; effective TMS slowed responses on the action task relative to the location task [ t (22) = 3.2, P = 0.004, Cohen's d = 0.65], with no such difference during sham stimulation [ t (22) = 0.9, P = 0.38, Cohen's d = 0.18].
HIV prevalence (95% CI) was 7.0% (5.6–8.7%) and an increasing trend was observed over 2019–2021 ( p = 0.002).
The quartile analysis of SHBG demonstrated a dose-response relationship (Q4 vs Q1 in model 3: OR = 0.61, P = .008), with a significant trend test ( P ≤ .002).
Comparing CYP26B1 negative and weakly positive tumours with CYP26B1 moderate and strong expressing tumours showed that there was a highly significant association with survival (HR = 1.465, 95%CI = 1.151–1.865, χ 2 = 9.832, p = 0.002).
There was a decreasing trend in visual acuity with increasing severity ( P = 0.002).
MMSE and USSLB do not correlate well ( r = −0.19, p = 0.34) and remain highly significant (both p = 0.002) in a combined regression model for betaine.
A highly significant main effect of T4 was detected ( F = 11.808, p = 0.002, partial η 2 = 0.312).
There was also a significant trend to worse HRQoL represented by overall summary and physical dimensions scores with low TSAT ( P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively), serum iron (both P = 0.03), and ferritin ( P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively).
Spearman’s rank correlations between r 2 values at different sites were highly significant ( P < 0.002 in all cases) with r S values ranging from 0.48 to 0.84.
Table 2 shows a highly significant correlation between a family history of oral cancer and awareness of risk factors for oral cancer ( P = 0.002), with 95% of respondents with a family history of oral cancer having knowledge of risk factors for mouth cancer in the highest category.
In the primary analysis, the ex vivo TNF-α values showed different temporal dynamics than the in vivo values as indicated by a highly significant group by time interaction analysis comparing the ex vivo and the in vivo values after the TNF-α peak, i.e. from 3 to 24 h (p = 0.002).