Based on the results of the SVLT (IR, DR, recognition, and recognition DI) and RCFT (IR and DR), post hoc analysis indicates a highly significant difference in the SNSB-II memory domain between the HC and PAD groups ( p = 0.004) and between the AAD and PAD groups ( p = 0.011).
Excerpts
The differences between men and women were statistically and practically significant, with academic stress 0.34 SDs higher for cis women ( p = 0.004) and illness stress 0.51 SDs higher ( p < 0.001).
The complete virus distribution model returned an overall highly significant contribution of candidate drivers taken altogether (MGLM with 999 random permutations, n = 103 samples × 5 virus species, multivariate score = 126.3, df = 32, p = 0.004).
Even with task accuracy scores adjusted to account for the influence of alcohol intoxication, the difference in accuracy between the easy ( M = 91.97, 95% CI [86.59, 96.31]) and hard group ( M = 82.68, 95% CI [78.30, 87.06]) remained highly significant, F (1, 95) = 8.864, p = .004, n p 2 = .09.
Segmented regression showed an increasing trend in impact factor for publications during 1972 to 1996 ( β = 0.16, p = 0.004) and a decreasing trend during 1997 to 2023 ( β = −0.048, p = 0.005).
In the posterior brain, two regions stood out as highly significant (PosA3, p = 0.004 and PosC4, p ≤0.001) ( Figure 5B ).
All sensors showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.004).
borderline significancep-value = 4.0x10 -3
Maternally-derived associations of this APOB SNP with borderline significance were also seen with fasting glucose and insulin levels in the combined results (combined p-value = 4.0x10 -3 and 7.4x10 -4 for glucose and insulin respectively), whereas no associations were observed with the paternally-derived allele ( Table 1 ).
The model for TEM fibres >5 μm long, which correspond most closely to PCM estimates, fit the data better than models for other TEM exposure indicators and the exposure term was more highly significant (p=0.004).
A permutation test further verified that the actual difference in standard deviations between late versus early start groups is highly significant relative to what this standard deviation difference would be under random group labeling (p = 0.004) ( Fig. 1D ).
In contrast, the intervention group recorded a significant improvement, due to the highly significant interaction effect of −0.007 ( p = 0.004), the slope of the lactate curve decreased substantially.
However, on day 6 the infectivity of the oseltamivir-treated infected group was 123-fold higher than the control infected group (10 5.4 ffu per ferret), a highly significant difference ( p = 0.004; Fig. 4 d).
In regards to the TNF-α:IGF ratio, age was a highly significant predictor of the differences in this catabolic:anabolic ratio outcome (p = 0.004) in this study.
Results of the log‐rank test were marginally significant (x 2 = 8.417, P = 0.004): individuals without an elevated CUGBP1 had a TTP of 7.868 months, while those with an elevated CUGBP1 had a TTP of 5.076 months, as shown in Figure 2 .
Serum Levels of sCD30 Renal transplant recipients showed relatively high levels of sCD30 which ranged from 2.252 U/mL to 97.144 U/mL, mean = 20.669 ± 18.713 U/mL, compared to that of controls which ranged from 0.291 U/mL to 18.242 U/mL, mean = 5.517 ± 5.304 U/mL, with highly significant difference ( t = 4.322, P = 0.004) ( Figure 2 ). 3.3.
All but one comparison were highly significant, t (206) ≥ 2.88, p ≤ .004, the exception being the contrast of compatible ball position/incompatible screen position and incompatible ball position/compatible screen position, t (206) < 1, p = .940.
In addition, the children of the MIPAS-Family group reported highly significant reductions of the headache frequencies (Pre–Post 1: z = −2.841, p = .004; Pre–Post 2: z = −3.126, p = .002), whereas the children of the Biofeedback group only showed a significant improvement for the Pre–Post 1 comparison ( z = −2.333, p = .02).
This difference was large in magnitude and highly significant, t (6) = 4.56, p = .004, d = 1.72.
In models adjusted for age, study site, smoking, BMI, weight, waist, and urinary creatinine, the BPA association with total testosterone levels was highly significant (β = 0.046; 95% CI, 0.015–0.076; p = 0.004; Table 3 ).
Further, we have confirmed this association with a meta-analysis that includes seven published patient cohorts; while the association is relatively modest and somewhat less than that reported for SLE (OR 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.92), it is highly significant ( P = 0.004).
Of interest, pathway analysis based on both plasma metabolites and gene transcriptome demonstrated highly significant ( P < 0.004) differences of PPAR pathway between I − and I + T1D/ND participants.
In Mossi ethnic group we noted that the CD3 + Panγδ + proportion remains stable through the season, whereas in Fulani ethnic group the proportion of these cells was double of that measured in Mossi ethnic group at the low transmission season and this difference was highly significant ( p = 0.004) (Figure 5 ) and remained significant during the high transmission season ( p = 0.04).
This difference was highly significant ( p = 0.004).
The prediected linear regression was highly significant (R 2 =0.345, r =0.59, P=0.004).
The PCT improvement was highly significant in the aggregated analysis (p = .004).