showed a trendP = 0.008
Though interaction between rs3837091, rs17997332, rs740603 showed a trend to be significant ( P = 0.008), the CVC value was insignificant (Table S6).
Though interaction between rs3837091, rs17997332, rs740603 showed a trend to be significant ( P = 0.008), the CVC value was insignificant (Table S6).
Other Drug Use In individual biomarker models controlling for other drug use, the above results were unchanged, except that the positive association of EndoCAb with Trails A became a marginal trend ( p = 0.008). 3.2.3.
Although the significance was rather attenuated after matching, it was still highly significant (log-rank p = 0.008). 3.5.
When comparing the effects of ZM241385 with MRS1754 regarding their ability to reverse the adenosine-suppressed K Ca 3.1 current, there was a highly significant difference ( p =0.008).
Additionally detected focal CNAs showed a highly significant enrichment for known cancer driver genes ( n = 38, P < 0.008).
An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that freezing during the last three trials of extinction does not predict freezing at 24-h recall, F (1,37) = 0.96, P = .34, and the effect of phenotype on 24-h recall remains highly significant even after adjusting for freezing differences during extinction, F (1,37) = 7.81, P = .008.
Also, as demonstrated in Table 1 , the prevalence of astigmatism had an increasing trend from 7.3% in 14 years old students to 27.4% in 18 year old subjects (P=0.008).
In the 2 nd week post-therapy, 16 patients in Group I and 5 patients in Group II showed a decreasing trend ( P = 0.008).
For w AlbA density, there was a significant effect of sex (F (1, 378) = 30.1413, P < 0.001) and population (F (13, 378) = 39.6288, P < 0.001) on density as well as a marginally significant interaction effect (F (9, 378) = 2.278, P = 0.008) when considering only superinfected individuals.
When comparing early stage (1 and 2) and advanced stage tumors (3 and 4), we found that loss of cytoplasmic CDK1 was borderline significant for early stage tumors ( p = 0.063) but highly significant for late stage tumors ( p = 0.008) ( Figure 4C and Table 2 ).
A highly significant reduction in pain was observed between the first and third doses (54.1% vs. 38.5%, p = 0.008).
Of specific relevance for human AML, in leukemia driven by both NPM1c and a FLT3 activating mutation a highly significant survival advantage was demonstrated ( P =0.008)( Figure 6d ).
For short-term outcomes (3-month mortality, n = 7), deceased patients showed a trend toward prolonged TTPr compared with survivors (59 s vs. 27 s, p = 0.008); multivariable analysis was not performed due to limited events.
Instead, when mouse brain extracts were subjected to HPLC-MS analysis, the increase of cerebral CE in the scrapie-affected group were highly significant ( p = 0.008).
TMJ disorders were highly significantly more frequent in males versus females ( p = 0.008 **), a highly significant difference that reflects sex-specific biomechanical or parafunctional habits contributing to temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
The 2-marker prognostic signature, based on ATF6α high and p-p38 low levels, showed highly significant association with time to recurrence ( P = 0.008) and a high trend with overall survival ( P = 0.062).
For hygroscopicity ( Figure 2 f), a moderately significant correlation was observed ( p -value ≤ 0.008, R 2 = 0.51), with both the linear and quadratic effects of A being influential.
Comparison of 3-month HBV e antigen serologic conversion showed a highly significant improvement of HBV e antigen lost for patients received adoptive antiviral therapy (OR = 6.57; 95% CI, [1.64, 26.31]; p = 0.008).
The increase in the risk of a second generation is highly significant (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n = 10, W = 19, P = 0.008).
A Wilcoxon signed ranks test revealed a significant reduction in BAS score from baseline to endpoint ( P = 0.026; Z = −2.232) and a highly significant reduction from baseline to follow-up ( P = 0.008; Z = −2.636).
The difference between NR/ACR30 and ACR50/ACR70 in pre-MTX samples was highly significant (1495ng/ml vs 2705ng/ml, p=0.008).
For the recessive model, there was no significant heterogeneity between the results of the individual studies (χ 2 6 = 9.9, p = 0.1), although there was a highly significant trend towards the null with increasing study size (χ 2 1 = 7.0, p = 0.008).
The interaction term of FEV 1 BeforeInfx and CFTR was not significant for each organism with the exception of Klebsiella which was found to be highly significant (p-value = 0.008).
While the effect was only marginal between 140 and 150 ms (F(1,12) = 3.68; p = .079), it was highly significant between 150 and 160 ms (F(1,12) = 10.219; p = .008), with higher activity upon upright faces.
7D , the degree of reward and threat representations in these networks during approach and avoid trials reflect significant or marginally significant deviations from non-conflict trials for both networks (salience network: approach trials vs low conflict trial t (52) = 2.76, p = .008; avoid trials vs low conflict trials t (52) = −2.86, p = .006; right inferior frontal network: approach trials vs low conflict t (52) = −2.71, p = .009; avoid trials vs low conflict trials t (52) = 1.83, p = .07). 4.