The highly significant environmental effects ( P < 0.01) for all traits assayed except for yield, ASI, PASP, and EPP under drought and DS, ASI, and EPP under optimal conditions indicated that the research environments in Nigeria varied in terms of climatic and edaphic conditions.
Excerpts
To consolidate and summarize the pathway enrichment analysis results from gometh , nominally significant GO terms ( P < 0.01) within the “biological processes” category were further run through the REVIGO tool, which avoids reporting GO terms with greater than 70% in semantic similarity measure [ 79 ].
Differences between means were considered significant with P < 0.05 and highly significant with P < 0.01.
Differences were considered significant at p <0.05 and highly significant at p <0.01.
RBC, HGB, MPV, and HCT were decreased; MPV and HCT showed significant differences ( P < 0.05), while RBC and HGB showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.01).
After applying Student's Paired ‘t’ test there was a highly significant difference in the mean values of PI, GI, and SBI, (except OHI-S, P < 0.01) when the baseline scores were compared with the third month scores.
In addition, PCC analysis showed that there was an extremely significant negative relationship (r = −0.832, P < 0.01) between miR-6615-5p expression and Smad7 mRNA expression, further confirming the target relationship between miR-6615-5p and Smad7. iNOS and NO In order to investigate if iNOS and NO were involved in NH 3 -induced inflammatory damage, iNOS activity ( Figure 3 A), iNOS mRNA ( Figure 3 B) and protein expression ( Figure 3 C), and NO content ( Figure 3 D) were measured.
Results Fig leaf extract had an obvious inhibitory effect on Fusarium , and the difference was significant ( P < 0.05) or highly significant ( P < 0.01).
Although EPM variables of PLPC treated mice have evolved in the direction of an anxiolysis, their values, however, did not reach statistical significance, except for the number of attempts that was found significantly diminished as compared to control ( p < 0.01).
A Welch’s correction two-tailed T-test was performed between the two groups, with highly significant result of P < 0.01.
Between different soil nutrients and stoichiometry, the SOC, TN and TP had an extremely significant positive correlation ( P < 0.01), and the correlation with SOC and TN was closer.
Migrant patients had a significant trend association between hospitalization and age (p < 0.01, Table 3 ), while resident TB patients had a high average rate without the trend association ( p = 0.59, Table 3 ).
The differences were considered as significant for P <0.05 and highly significant for P <0.01.
The production system reflected a highly significant prevalence of pneumonia in veal calves raised in mixed (27.8%; p < 0.01) and extensive management (35.7%; p < 0.05) systems.
The significance of the measured T -test value was considered as follows: not significant (NS) when P > 0.05, significant (S) when P ≤ 0.05 ( ∗ ), highly significant (HS) when P < 0.01( ∗∗ ), and very highly significant (V.H.S.) when P < 0.001( ∗∗∗ ), where P is the probability (reflect of null hypothesis). 2.3.2.
The experimental results showed that the linear coefficient of the water content ( X 1 ) and extraction temperature ( X 3 ) were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), whereas the extraction time ( X 4 ) was considerable ( p < 0.05).
In this study, the groups were considered to be significantly different if P < 0.05 and extremely significant if P < 0.01.
Differences between groups were considered statistically highly significant if P < 0.01.
A highly significant difference ( P < 0.01) was observed in the EPEF among different groups; birds fed finisher diets CTL21 recorded the highest EPEF (329.87%) which was statistically equal to birds fed test diet APS21 and CTL20 diet (305.86% and 303.48%, respectively) but was different from birds fed APS20, APS19, CTL19, CTL18, and APS18 with EPEF values as 296.04%, 288.50%, 266.91%, 231.62%, and 230.14%, respectively.
Furthermore, the L* values showed highly significant positive correlations (p < 0.01) with upper epidermal cell width, cell pinch angle, and cell area, and significant positive correlations with total chlorophyll and chlorophyll b content.
Statistical analyses revealed highly significant velocity differences between control (mock) and LatB or BDM treatments ( t -test, p <0.01, Figure 3G ).
Differences in peak amplitudes and latencies, upon varying pulse duration, were highly significant (p < 0.01) across the entire dataset (n = 39 MEAs), but only for the reverberating responses, not for the early responses.
The final difference in cancer prevalence was highly significant ( p < 0.01) by chi-squared test analysis.
The calculation of correlations between the respective variables showed a highly significant association for the leading electrode (PO8; r = -0.56, p < 0.01) but not for the trailing electrode (Pz; r = -0.12).
Nonetheless, the GSH/GSSG ratio was positively impacted by the treatments containing extracts, with TS being moderately significant (** p < 0.01 vs. control group).