Excerpts

We found a dose-dependent cell protection, and cell survival was highly significant ( P < 0.01) when compared with that of tBH-treated cells ( Fig. 5 B).

Results showing P value less than 0.05 were considered as significant (P < 0.05) and whereas P value less than 0.01 as highly significant (P < 0.01).

Heterotypic seroconversion was highly significant against A/H5N1 in the 2006–2007 and 2010–2011 VCCs and in the 2006–2007 VCC against A/H9N2 (McNemar; p < 0.01).

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, highly significant at p < 0.01, and very highly significant at p < 0.001. 3.

Association with socio economic status Table 3 shows the association between lower SES status and SSB consumption which is highly significant in all age groups [P < 0.01] and was an absolute 15-16% difference between top and bottom quartiles.

Most often, there were highly significant variations ( p < 0.01) in the samples’ olfactory perception (e.g., the smell of chicken meat, the smell of offals filling, the smell of spinach filling).

The retention values of significance between “A” and “C”, “MO”, “C” and “MO” ( P <0.5); and those highly significant between “M” and “C”, “MO”, “B” and “MO” ( P <0.01) can be seen.

Statistical significance was considered to be highly significant at 0.1% ( P < 0.01) level, significant at 5% ( P < 0.05) level, and nonsignificant above 5% ( P > 0.05) level.

The selected independent variables were Z 3 , Z 5 , and Z 6 (P < 0.05), of which Z 3 and Z 6 reached an extremely significant level (P < 0.01).

A p- value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (* p < 0.05), less than 0.01 was considered a highly significant difference (** p < 0.01), and less than 0.001 was considered an extremely significant difference (*** p < 0.001).

Using this approach, predictive algorithms could be written using the antioxidant data that exhibited highly significant correlations with seminal characteristics related to oxidative stress including sperm count ( r 2 = 0.34; p < 0.01; Figure 10 F), seminal MDA ( r 2 = 0.43; p < 0.001; Figure 10 G), sperm DNA damage ( r 2 = 0.31; p < 0.01; Figure 10 H) and mitochondrial ROS generation ( r 2 = 0.27; p < 0.01; Figure 10 I). 4.

At 2-month follow-up, the tACS treatment group did show a marginally significant decrease in AHRS with an effect size of 0.450 ( p < 0.01, 95% upper bound = 0.10) comparable to our previous study 49 .

The differences between the vaccine groups for the variable w are indicated as positive and nonsignificant (+, i.e., a positive difference between the group sample means but for which P was >0.05) or negative and nonsignificant (−, i.e., a negative difference between the group sample means but for which P was >0.05), positive and significant (*, P ≤ 0.05), or positive and highly significant (**, P ≤ 0.01).

Mean PD in group 1 was 4.42 mm when compared with group 2 and group 4 where the values were 1.64 and 1.60 mm, respectively, which were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.01).

Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05, highly significant at P < 0.01, and extremely significant at P < 0.001.

There was a decreasing trend in cesarean section rate with increasing gestational age (88.9% vs 82.9% vs 82.3%, P<0.01), while the emergency cesarean section rate increased (30.9% vs 33.9% vs 39.6%, P<0.01).

Soil organic carbon content The influence of Y and T on the soil organic carbon content was highly significant (P<0.01; Figure 4 ).

The leaves of the CL and XIS49 cucumber during the cold treatment presented totally different lipid compositions since all the lipids detected were significantly different ( p < 0.5), and 142 showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01).

Although no significance in the PCT concentration was found between the 1st and 5th day ( p = 0.1000), the difference between the 3rd and 5th day was highly significant ( p < 0.010).

It was determined that the extent of dye penetration among the study groups was statistically highly significant (p<0.01).

There was an extremely significant difference between the Positive group ( P < 0.01), LSSE groups ( P < 0.05) and the DM group. 3.2.2.

As the main results of this study, pancreatic cancer cases showed a trend for a higher median of 8-OHdG as well as a significant trend when the level of 8-OHdG was categorized in Quartile scale [1.50 (1.09, 2.06) (P=0.01)].

However, the storage period had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.01) on RR.

A highly significant positive correlation was found between the PPO activities and the TP content ( r = 0.981, p < 0.01).

Similarly, only one multiple-threshold model goodness-of-fit test was nominally significant (M–M DZ twin pairs, P =0.01) in the TE cohort ( Table 2 ); however, considering goodness-of-fit tests were performed for each of the five zygosity groups and four additional combined groupings, this finding is not considered study-wide significant.