Excerpts

Differences were deemed significant for P values < 0.05 or highly significant for P values < 0.01.

Furthermore, squalene exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with ABTS ( r = 0.80; p < 0.01), potentially explaining the high ABTS radical scavenging ability of C.G ( Figure 7 b), as its squalene content was significantly higher than that of other types of camellia oils (p < 0.05) ( Figure 4 a).

The mean δ 2 H was significantly different in rice crayfish, pond crayfish, and wild crayfish ( p < 0.05, shown in Figure 2 ), with the rice crayfish and pond crayfish groups showing extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01, shown in Figure 2 ).

amblycephala , were predicted for the 44 highly significant differently-expressed miRNAs ( p < 0.01), which were identified in this study.

Three models showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.001), one missing model exhibited highly significant differences ( P < 0.01), and six missing models indicated significant differences ( P < 0.05).

When compared with the control group, the increase of P1 larvae after 10 μM U0126 treatment was highly significant (p<0.01; Fig. 3G ).

In all arrangements, among-groups ( F CT ) differentiation was highly significant (P<0.01).

Significant main effects of storage time ( p ≤ 0.01) were observed for all traits, while the treatment effect was also highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) in nearly all cases.

By day 7, the removal rate reached 59.37%, demonstrating a highly significant difference compared to the control group ( p < 0.01).

It exhibited extremely significant difference to the control at the concentration more than 50 μg/ml ( p < .01).

Comparing between groups, the virus titers obtained from the youngest ducks were highest, and virus titers in heart and lung were 10 1.5 –10 2.3 higher than those of the other two groups, with highly significant difference ( P < 0.01, Figure 3B ).

AMOVA revealed highly significant differentiation ( p < 0.01) between groups of accessions grouped according to their germplasm provider, population type, country of origin, and region of origin, accounting for 19%, 17.5%, 38%, and 27% of the total genetic variation, respectively ( Table 3 ).

The obtained results were interpreted as follows: insignificant P >0.05; significant P <0.05; highly significant P <0.01, P <0.001.

ns meant no significant difference between groups, p > 0.05; * meant a significant difference between groups, p ≤ 0.05; ** meant a highly significant difference between groups, p ≤ 0.01; *** meant an extremely significant difference between groups, p ≤ 0.001; and **** meant an exceedingly significant difference between groups, p ≤ 0.0001. 5.

The MNL analysis indicated that effects of age, level of education, livestock holding, access to climate information and access to extension services in determining perception levels were found statistically highly significant (P < 0.01) (Table 4 ).

Scalar wind (W) had a highly significant positive relationship with YFT (r = 0.794; p <0.01), SKJ (r = 0.855; p <0.01), LOT (r = 0.939; p <0.01), FRI (r = 0.842; p <0.01), BLT (r = 0.867; p <0.01), FRZ (r = 0.952; p <0.01), and with KAW (r = 0.95; p <0.01) respectively (Table 2 ).

In contrast, pregnant mice from RV group showed a highly significant decrease in the uterus weight ( p < 0.01) with almost 50% decline compared with SV group.

In addition, although the ordinate of inflection point of R distribution had no obvious correlation with stand density, the abscissa of inflection point of R distribution had highly significant correlation with stand density (P<0.01), Which means that the inflection point of equation has close relationship with stand characteristics, and this relationship may be used to predict the inflection point or the parameters of equation.

The results showed that the D 2 between the clusters was highly significant (P = 0.01), indicating a high degree of genotype diversity.

The calculation of correlations between the respective variables showed a highly significant association for the leading electrode (PO8; r = -0.56, p < 0.01) but not for the trailing electrode (Pz; r = -0.12).

The final body weight, WGR, SGR and PER showed highly significant negative linear ( p < 0.01) and quadratic ( p < 0.01) relationships with dietary MDA content; thereinto, the final body weight, WGR and PER were significantly lower in the M8 and M16 groups compared to the M0 and M1 groups, and the SGR was significantly lower in the M16 group compared to the M0 and M1 groups ( p < 0.05).

showed a trend for better outcome on mortality rate for EVAR compared to OR at 30 days (2% versus 6%, p = NS) and at 1 year (2% versus 14%, p = 0.01) [ 4 ].

The differences were considered to be significant at p ≤ 0.05 or highly significant at p ≤ 0.01.

In line with power expectations ( Supplementary Figure 5 ), 75 of these regions were genome-wide significant in at least one of the two cohorts and always at least nominally significant (p<0.01) in the other.

We only found a highly significant correlation (for both male and female) at day 10 between milk leptin levels and pup ́s mean weight (p<0.01) ( Fig 5 ) and a less significant correlation (p<0.05) between adiponectin levels and female-pup ́s mean weight, also at day 10 (data not shown).