Furthermore, the interactive effects of phenolic extract concentration-drying temperature and phenolic extract concentration-feed flow rate were significant ( p < 0.05); and the interaction between drying temperature and feed flow rate was highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Excerpts
6 , the effects of all factors on soil fertility were highly significant ( p < 0.01).
As shown in Table 5 , CL-EPIDTN achieved statistically significant or highly significant improvements (p < 0.01) in HR@10 over all baseline models on the Amazon Books dataset.
The least squares means of the log transformed counts, for the main fixed effects of treatments, breeds, and the interaction treatment ∗ breed were compared with pairwise t tests only if the corresponding main effects and interactions in the model were significant ( p > 0.05) or highly significant ( p > 0.01) [ 22 ].
Compared with the normal group, the body weight in model group had an extremely significant effect ( p < 0.01).
Compared to the non-extruded group, the expression levels of these differential metabolites exhibit highly significant changes following extrusion treatment ( P < 0.01), suggesting that the extrusion process markedly activates the metabolic activity of this pathway.
Statistical Analysis Results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, considering significant differences when p ≤ 0.05 (*) and highly significant differences when p ≤ 0.01 (**).
3.2.4 Statistical analysis and treatment efficacy The ANOVA statistical analysis revealed that most of the parameters measured were influenced significantly by the treatments administered, as indicated by the highly significant ( p < 0.01) values in the Model and CKTR (treatment) sources ( Table 1 ).
The total population size of a country had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.01) on species introductions, and a significant effect ( p < 0.05) on species establishment (Fig. 5F ).
Physical Properties According to analysis of variance (ANOVA), the effect of the glue spread rate on all the physical properties of rubberwood LVL were highly significant ( p < 0.01) except for moisture content.
Additionally, the TAIL group required fewer days of antagonist injections 5 (5–6) days compared to the control group 6 (5–6) days, with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01).
In the AGS cells and AGS-exo, we detected 552 miRNAs, of which 133 miRNAs are statistically significant, 37 miRNAs are highly significant (|log2 (multiple)| >1 and p < 0.01), and 96 miRNAs show significant differences ((|log2 (multiple)| >1 and 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05).
Linear regressions of LM versus ultrasound ( D U1 , D U2 , D U3 and W U ) measurements were highly significant ( p < 0.01; Figure 3 ); with D U3 showing the strongest relationship as would be expected given the pair‐wise comparisons earlier ( y = 2.94 x – 27.10, adj.
Selection in CSWG breed For CSWG, selected candidate genes were significantly enriched in 44 GO terms ( P < 0.05), and among which, 12 terms were extremely significant ( P < 0.01) (Figure S 3 ).
However, there was a highly significant heterogeneity among studies ( P < 0.01, I 2 = 99.5%), meaning that 99.5% of the variation in effect sizes is attributed to differences in study features, populations, or methodologies rather than sampling error ( Fig. 2 ).
The differences were considered to be statistically significant when P <0.05 and highly significant when P <0.01.
It can be observed from the figure that there is a highly significant correlation (p<0.01) between the number of days of waterlogging and the wheat yield rate.
It is noteworthy that total IgG levels varied during the infestation process, with a highly significant difference between naïve and Eimeria spp. infestation, C. pisiformis infestation and P. ovis cuniculi infestation groups (p < 0.01).
Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, with significance levels categorized as: P < 0.001 (highly significant), 0.001 ≤ P < 0.01 (very significant), 0.01 ≤ P < 0.05 (significant), and P ≥ 0.05 (not significant).
2 shows that fish exposed to radiation only (G2) showed a highly significant decrease (93%) in their WBC counts; 16 × 10 3 /mm 3 as compared with 238 × 10 3 /mm 3 for control fish G1 ( P < 0.01).
Gluconobacter showed a highly significant positive correlation with aspartic acid ( p < 0.01), while Asaia correlated positively with L -phenylalanine and N -acetyl-L-arginine (p < 0.05).
In the C2C3 group, only products labeled for calories showed a significant trend change ( p < 0.01), which decreased with the intervention.
The compounds 3-ethyl-benzaldehyde, 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol, 2-propyl-1-heptanol, 2,3-dimethyl-1-butanol, and 2-ethyl-hexanoic acid showed highly significant negative correlations with the heat-sensitive indicators furosine and lactulose when the heat treatment temperature of milk increased ( p < 0.01); a highly significant positive correlation with immunoglobulin G, α-lactoalbumin, and β-lactoglobulin ( p < 0.01); and a significant positive correlation with lactoferrin ( p < 0.05).
Results from post hoc tests were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, and highly significant at p < 0.01.
The differences in these physiological indicators were highly significant (all p < 0.01). 2.3.