Additionally, there was a significant difference in the total FG% between the intervention players at the 1st week and the 9th week ( χ 2 = 127.032, P = 0.000), and the difference in the FG% of the three shooting techniques was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).
Excerpts
The differences in these physiological indicators were highly significant (all p < 0.01). 2.3.
HepG2 cancerous cells treated with the IC 50 dose of APT-VRM NPs recorded highly significant up-regulation ( P < 0.01) in the FADD gene expression (4.5 fold increase) and highly significant down-regulation ( P <0.01) in the c-FLIP gene expression (0.11 fold decrease) compared to the control (1), as shown in Fig. 2 A.
Among all the agronomic traits, we found that PL, TGP, EPN, GWT, GL, GW, GY, SS, GPP and GD showed highly significant (P < 0.01) variation, while PH, showed significant (P < 0.05) variation in ploidy level comparison (Table 3 ).
According to the soil types, the changes in the aromatic compounds were insignificant, while the monoterpene, diterpene and other groups were moderately significant (p < 0.01).
This improvement was highly significant ( P ≤ 0.01 ) with Ans + Grp oil mixture (226 g) followed by Ans oil (215 g), while the Grp oil group (205 g) was comparable to the control group (193 g).
As expected, there was a positive trend between BMI and blood pressure range, with 27.7 kg/m 2 in the elevated or less group and 31.7 kg/m 2 in the Stage 2 group, respectively ( p < 0.01).
A significant level of P < 0.05 and extremely significant level of P < 0.01 were used to find significant difference between treatments through the LSD test.
The results of the SSP analysis of variance showed that temperature and tissue × gene have highly significant ( p < 0.01) effect on the expression of S. maximus PPAR genes.
However, the effect of PS-microplastic concentration on hatching number was highly significant ( p < 0.01), with marked reductions seen in the two groups exposed to higher doses of PS-microplastic ( Figure 3 B).
On day 12 after treatments, tumor volume between myristoyl-CM4 (or ciaplatin) treatment and PBS (or CM4) treatment showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) (Figure 6C ).
* indicates a significant difference compared to the control (0.01 < p < 0.05); ** indicates an extremely significant difference compared to the control ( p < 0.01). 5.
There was a highly significant interaction ( p < 0.01) between treatment and genotype for proline content.
Statistical differences were considered significant when p < 0.05, highly significant when p < 0.01 [ 58 ]. 3.
Specifically, statistically significant difference ( p < 0.05) was seen comparing the average pressures of Brand A, and Brand C, at the two abdominal pressures tested, highly significant difference ( p < 0.01) was seen comparing the average pressures of Brand B at the two abdominal pressures tested (Fig. 13 ).
A comparison of the mean CMD incidence and symptom severity showed a highly significant difference between regions ( p < 0.01).
For body weight, the mean BMI values were 23.6 ± 3.2 kg/m 2 (95% CI: 22.7–24.5), 22.8 ± 2.9 kg/m 2 (95% CI: 21.9–23.7), and 21.5 ± 3.1 kg/m 2 (95% CI: 20.4–22.6) in the NG, MIG, and MOG, respectively, demonstrating a decreasing trend with worsening liver function impairment ( F = 7.25, P < 0.01).
In the case of vitamin A retention, it is particularly worth noting the highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) effect of the season in which the milk for production of experimental cheese was obtained.
The effect of amblyopic eye VA on responses of the amblyopic eye in binocular viewing was borderline significant (0.09 D less accurate for each line of VA reduction, P = 0.01), whereas the interaction between stimulus and VA was not significant for the accommodative response of the amblyopic eye in binocular viewing ( P = 0.23).
This effect is substantial and statistically highly significant ( p <.01, d = .81).
The ANOVA results showed that moisture content treatment had an extremely significant effect on the number of LAB and yeast ( P < 0.01), and additive treatment had an extremely significant effect on the LAB and Enterobacteriaceae quantities in the silages ( P < 0.001).
This acceleration was rTsCTL dose-dependent ( r = 0.976, P < 0.01) and exhibited an increasing trend with increasing rTsCTL dose ( F = 82.091, P < 0.01).
The P value was applied to indicate the level of significance where P ≤0.001 is very highly significant, P ≤0.01 is highly significant, and P ≤0.05 is considered significant.
Furthermore, one-way ANOVA ( Table 4 ) revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) were observed between the concentration and the best concentration was 426 μg/mL with cell toxicity and cell proliferation at 37% and 70%, respectively.
test *± Standard deviation of three replicates, Asterisks (*) represent significant differences ( p < 0.05); double asterisks (**) represent highly significant differences ( p < 0.01). 4.