Excerpts

2012 )—a highly significant difference ( P < 0.00001, χ 2 test).

However, direct effect was highly significant (ANOVA, F (2,65) = 41.47, P < 0.00001).

Also, the random effect of study was highly significant for the half‐life analysis ( p < 0.00001), but there was no significant random effect of study for the percent recalcitrance model ( p = 1).

However, there was a highly significant decrease in the number of COVID-19 infections favored by the Evusheld 600 mg dose group over the other group ( p < 0.00001).

For a test, we conducted chi 2 tests for some of the variables, but, as assumed, all results were highly significant (e.g., “gender”: chi 2 : 695303.9042, p < .00001).

For sedentary individuals, the results show highly significant differences between the four conditions [ χ ( 3 ) 2 = 25.15, p = 0.00001].

This was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.00001).

In line with these observations, the 2 (task: judge number/mean size) x 2 (unattended magnitude: small/big) repeated measure ANOVA performed on PSEs estimates showed a highly significant interaction between task and magnitude of the unattended dimension (F(1,13) = 52.17, p<10 −5 ), with PSE estimates differing between small and large unattended magnitude only for the average size task (p<10 −5 ) but not for the numerosity task (p = 0.37).

Interestingly, investigation of intragenic relationships between VastDB AS events reveals that pairs of cassette exons (especially in the case of neighboring exons) and pairs of retained introns within the same gene show highly significant correlation of inclusion or retention levels across samples from each species ( P < 10 −5 , Wilcoxon rank-sum test) ( Supplemental Fig.

A total of 21 children with PSTC and 518 children with migraine showed that drawings had similar features except one-third (28.6%) with PSTC depicted diplopia which was highly significant ( P = 0.00001).

All were preserved with one or several ingredients listed in Annex V of the EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC 1223/2009), which was a highly significant difference compared to solid shampoo ( p < 0.00001, Fisher's exact test).

graminis cultures were positively correlated with one another and very highly significant ( P = 0.00001) ( Table 2 ).

However, the effect estimates from the four studies reporting HRs did not reach statistical significance (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.96–1.31; I 2 = 100%, p < 0.00001) ( Figure 2 ).

In fluency [ 17 , 18 , 21 , 41 , 77 ], there was a highly significant deficit in SZ (Hedge’s g = −2.03, df = 4, p < 0.00001, CI = [−2.82, −1.24]), but with large heterogeneity within results (84%) ( Figure 2 (2.6)).

There was a strong positive association of Cp biomarker positivity and asthma severity category that was highly significant (P<0.00001).

Our results show very highly significant correlation of concordance (Spearman's Ro = 1, p <= 10 -5 ) indicating no support for the premise that bowing had this effect.

Assessment of aCL Presence by Meta-Analysis Presence of aCL in dementia patients was highly significant compared to controls (OR: 4.94, 95% CI: 2.66–9.16, p < 0.00001; I 2 = 32%, p = 0.16) ( Figure 2 ). aCL was present in 32.80% of dementia patients and 9.50% in controls corresponding to 3.45 times higher probability to present with dementia than controls.

5 showed a highly significant difference for these pairs of groups, p < 0.00001.

The apical recurrence rate was reduced from 52% to 15% (SD 10.7%), which is also highly significant, p < 0.00001, as was the reduction in the posterior compartment recurrences–31% reduced to 10% (SD 10.2%) with p < 0.00001.

A permutation test for a difference in the mean final acuity between these two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.00001).

Species Response Curve (SRC) The analysis clearly indicates highly significant differences ( p < 0.00001) for increased population variable (conservation status) in comparison with all other variables due to their maximum frequency as shown in Figure 2A .

It was showed that 10 mg/d vortioxetine had extremely significant difference on nausea when compared to placebo (OR=4.18, 95% CI=3.21 to 5.44, P<0.00001, Z=10.62 I2=0%) in results.

Lower HR after repeated performances The Friedman Test for changes in HR, including baseline (a 1 min run of hopping on the spot) and the three live performances, revealed highly significant changes ( p = 0.00001).

A total of 90 highly significant QTL (245 SNPs; p < 10 −5 ) were identified for salinity-related traits with the strongest associations detected for root Na + content followed by root Na + :K + ( Fig 2A and 2B , respectively).

Interestingly, only three AD risk variants exhibited genome‐wide ( p < 5 × 10 −8 ) significance or a level approaching significance ( p < 1 × 10 −5 ) with baseline memory performance, including rs429358 ( APOE , p = 2.03 × 10 −33 ), rs6733839 ( BIN1 , p = 3.96 × 10 −7 ), and rs4844610 ( CR1 , p = 8.43 × 10 −6 ).