Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp=0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We also show that the dramatic decrease in oocyst numbers in dsCactus females (median=0, p< 0.0001, ANOVA, Dunn’s multiple comparison test) relative to LacZ controls (median=127) (Figure 6C), is also associated with a strong and highly significant increase (13-fold) in TM7318 mRNA associated with the midgut of dsCactus infected females, relative to dsLacZ (p=0.0001, Mann-Whitney test) 24 h post-infection (Figure 6D), indicative Megacyte recruitment to the midgut.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Total facility time was reduced by 48 min and costs were 39.35% lower in the ES group, with all comparisons showing highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001). cost analysis drug‐induced sleep endoscopy hypoglossal nerve stimulation obstructive sleep apnea procedure efficiency 2.5 Discussion Drug‐induced sleep endoscopy can be efficiently and safely performed in the endoscopy suite in a cost‐effective manner.
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant correlations generally exist between the various markers (p<0.0001), with a slightly lesser significance between MLANA and MITF (p = 0.005), with the exception being between MLANA and TYR markers, where no statistical significance was found (p = 0.11).
Circulating tumor cells in melanoma patients.
PLoS One · 2012 · PMC3400630
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
SIRIUS follow-up results presented at ACC showed that the highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the CYPHER stent and bare metal control stent for all clinical event endpoints were sustained at 3-years.
Sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: a review.
Vasc Health Risk Manag · 2007 · PMC1994032
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, when plastic particles used in toxicity testing were classified into 4 size classes, the effect of particle size on toxicity was highly significant (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), and the dependence of safe concentration (HC 5 ) on particle size was even more remarkable, with a slope b = 1.21 according to the equation: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\log \;{\text{HC}}_{5} = 1.21\;\log \;{\text{S}}{-}2.10$$\end{document} log HC 5 = 1.21 log S - 2.10 where S is the mean particle size (μm) for each size class (r 2 = 0.92, n = 4).