Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, the compound induced a highly significant (P < 0.0001) antiproliferative effect at 72 vs. 96h exposure period (concentration range 31.25–250 μM in MDA-MB-231 and 15.62–125 μM in MDA-MB-468 cell line) as indicated by the significant reduction in the IC 50 values, in particular for MDA-MB-468 cells.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When compared to the PCAs ( S1 and S2 Figs) computed separately on the same data, the major shape and genetic PLS axes appear nearly identical to the corresponding first principal components (microsatellite PC1 = 23.35%, shape PC1 = 22.22%), with pairwise correlations displaying values greater than 0.98 and highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The regression analysis for DPPH IC50 response, the individual component coefficients (β1,β2, β3), and the ternary interaction term (β123) were all highly significant (p < 0.0001), showing individual oil effects and their combination effects in a significant manner on DPPH radical scavenging activity.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Critically, the main effect of Emotion type was highly significant [ F 1 (1,59) = 200.95, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.23; F 2 (1,18) = 8.84, p < 0.009, η 2 = 0.27], as putatively basic emotions ( M = 5.72) were rated higher than non-basic emotions ( M = 4.61).
Essentialist Biases in Reasoning About Emotions.
Front Psychol · 2020 · PMC7538619
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mixed effects model confirmed that location was a highly significant predictor of nesting (z = -7.942, P < 0.0001), whereas probe type was not (z = 1.205, P > 0.05) for the three probe types deployed at all locations (A330, 737–800, 747–400): however, when all probes are considered across all locations, 86% of blockages occurred in probes with a diameter range of 5–8 mm.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, our results showed that the overall average resistance of Salmonella isolated from M-hatcheries was higher than that of L-hatcheries ( p = 0.0013), while statistical analysis performed by using two-way ordinary ANOVA, showed that the difference in resistance to the individual antimicrobial was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).