Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

a strong trendp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
We initially compared the two genotypes including all the trials, and we observed a strong trend towards increased latency in juvenile Scn2a +/− female mice (two‐way repeated measure ANOVA on both days, F (4.177, 154.5) = 8.796, p < 0.0001 for trial effect, F (1.37) = 3.895, p = 0.056 for genotype effect and F (5.185) = 0.4196, p = 0.83 for genotype × trial interaction), but no difference in adult mice (two‐way repeated measure ANOVA on both days, F (3.460, 86.51) = 4.052, p = 0.0068 for trial effect, F (1.25) = 0.9008, p = 0.35 for genotype effect and F (5.125) = 0.51, p = 0.7693 for genotype trial interaction).
a significant trendp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Further, subgroup analysis based on the different assessments of IADL showed a significant trend toward higher difficulty in IADL in studies that used self-reported assessment (OR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.49, p < 0.0001, I 2 = 97%, p < 0.0001) compared with studies that objectively assessed IADL (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.28–2.00, p < 0.0001, I 2 = 81%, p < 0.0001) (test for subgroup difference: Chi 2 = 3.05, p = 0.08) ( Fig 13 ).
highly significantp < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
modestly significantp < .01420.3× alphaqualifiedgold
Respiratory coupling above .25 Hz was highly significant ( p < .0001; Figure 3A ), whereas cardiac coupling above 1.7 Hz was modestly significant ( p < .0142; Figure 3B ). 3.1 Risk assessment model The individual seizure values underlying Figure S3 served as features for training a logistic model, producing propensity scores for each seizure, which further distinguished SUDEP from non‐SUDEP cases.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the 41 individuals identified as hatchery descendants ( Table 5 ), this frequency (*90 allele) was very much smaller ( q = 0.036), being the difference between this and the frequency of the whole pool of hatchery samples highly significant (Chi-Square of 37.95, 1 d.f., p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When other therapies were analyzed together with GLP-1 RA (model 5), patients treated with GLP-1 RA had a 32.7 unit greater reduction in CAP compared to those not on these agents, a highly significant (t = 9.9, p < 0.0001), with a positive and robust effect size (partial correlation 0.5).